Skip to comments.The New Liberal Excuse,"It's An Ongoing Investigation",So I Cannot Answer That Question.
Posted on 04/13/2014 1:38:54 PM PDT by Cruz_West_Paul2016
Benghazi?Didn't Barry say that "It Was An Ongoing Investigation"?,and with Eric Holder recently?Didn't he also use the same excuse?,Has Hillary ever used it when she was backed into a corner?So instead of answering a very simple Yes or No Question,all we are getting lately is,"I Cannot Answer That Question At This Time Being It's An Ongoing Investigation".So will Lois Lerner use that excuse next time she gets grilled?.And the Democrats see the Republicans as the incompetent party?Have they taken notice that all Republicans and Conservatives have no problem answering any political question on any news outlet?
1. I only read about it in the paper this morning like you
2. Don’t go there buddy.
3. What difference does it make?
4. It depends on what the definition of the word “is”, is.
5. You have to pass the bill in order to find out what’s in it.
6. Now that I’ve made my opening remarks, I will take the 5th for all your subsequent questions.
Miss Stoobelius, we have evidence that only 6 people have signed up for the Affordable Health-Care act,yet you claim that 2 million signed up as of today.
Can you explain this to the members of congress?
That’s why their investigations take so long - so they never have to answer questions. The other thing that protects government that liberals are fond of are privacy rules. They don’t protect the privacy of individuals. They protect the privacy of government.
It's not new. It's exactly what they did when Clinton was president.
Not at ALL defending the Libtards, but EVERYONE does that. Both GOP and Dim.
yah,i know it’s not new,but lately they sure have been using it more often.Christ,if u ask Hillary Clinton about her possible early stages of an anyrism,she would answer it the same manner. What difference does it make at this time! It’s an ongoing investigation,therefore I refuse to answer!!!,and please don’t throw a shoe at me!
And then when the truth comes out they say, “It’s old news.”
When you have a partisan MSM who believes anything from the left, this endless delay works fine. So long as the “ball is in play”, any amount of justification is allowed because the opposition is that old, intolerant, non-progressive GOP.
However, if the person in question is a political Chief of Staff for a major GOP politician, summon the Grand Jury and Prosecutor, because the media hounds are baying for his blood.
Double Standards anyone?
but taking the fifth,and I did not have sex with that woman(or boy) has been fairly common since 1998.
Top Liberal excuse —
“Not at ALL defending the Libtards, but EVERYONE does that. Both GOP and Dim.”
Perhaps. But the Dims get away with it because the old media sides with them.
lets just consolidate all of their lame excuses into one.
something like this:lets use Sebilious as an example:
Katherine:I am incompetent,there is an ongoing investigation,I did not have sex with that woman,this is a racially charged question,and what difference does it make being it happened a long time ago.I plead the fifth!
good. let’s memorize these to respond to those wanting climate change enforcement!
Bill Clinton and Janet Reno often used that one. Still waiting their answers.
Bill Clinton:In regards to Monica,well uhm,at this time i cannot give you an honest blue dress,im sorry,I meant a honest answer so long as we have an ongoing investigation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.