Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. moves to ban judges affiliated with Boy Scouts
Daily Caller ^ | 04/21/2014 | Patrick Howley

Posted on 04/21/2014 7:26:06 AM PDT by Rusty0604

In a move with major legal implications, The California Supreme Court Advisory Committee on The Code of Judicial Ethics has proposed to classify the Boy Scouts as practicing “invidious discrimination” against gays, which would end the group’s exemption to anti-discriminatory ethics rules and would prohibit judges from being affiliated with the group.

“The Committee’s invitation ignores the fact that the change also encompasses other youth organizations whose membership is limited on the basis of gender, e.g., the Girl Scouts, as well as the military, which continues to practice ‘discrimination’ on the basis of gender,” wrote Catherine Short, legal director of the pro-life group Life Legal Defense Foundation, in a letter to the Committee obtained by TheDC that predicts possible implications for pro-life judges in the future.

“Perhaps this is not an unintended consequence,” wrote Short.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: boyscouts; churchandstate; discrimination; gaypride; gaystapo; homofascists; homonazis; homosexualagenda; homosexualbullying; judges; judiciary; lavendermafia; manboylove; pinklisted; refusalofservice

1 posted on 04/21/2014 7:26:06 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

We’re going to have scoutmasters do inappropriate things with your boys and you’re going to like it!


2 posted on 04/21/2014 7:27:32 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

However, because Mexico is strong on gay rights, illegal aliens from that country will still be allowed to practice law. Oh wait, they aren’t strong on gay rights.


3 posted on 04/21/2014 7:28:08 AM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Wait. I thought The Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts embraced homosexuality.


4 posted on 04/21/2014 7:32:12 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

When will the gay Nazis recognize that in a free country, no one is forced to do what the other wants. But they don’t want a free country, they want one where everyone owes them something, and they intend to collect.


5 posted on 04/21/2014 7:33:20 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

“Faggots, Forward!”

(Just like soebarkah.)


6 posted on 04/21/2014 7:34:25 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Not good enough I guess. I wonder if they can carry this farther to what religion one is affiliated with?


7 posted on 04/21/2014 7:35:26 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

“major legal implications,”

Yes. This is illegal and unconstitutional. And wrong. Knowing CA it will stand. So now the left goes back and looks at your charitable contributions, your affiliations, your postings.

This is nothing more than forcing people to pass a test of ideology. If the person has any sign of being a normal person, he is blackballed.

FASCISM.


8 posted on 04/21/2014 7:39:13 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Not good enough I guess. I wonder if they can carry this farther to what religion one is affiliated with?

Ahhhhhh. A hidden agenda, eh?

9 posted on 04/21/2014 7:41:30 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

No, the Mayor of Mexico City is very pro-homosexual and pushed for the legalization of same-sex marriage.

Please don’t refer to homosexuals as ‘gay’. There is nothing ‘gay’ about their conduct.


10 posted on 04/21/2014 7:42:11 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

So any judge who was a scout is toast?


11 posted on 04/21/2014 7:42:36 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (You can count my felonies by looking at my FR replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

It’s a purge using the suspension rationality associated with homosexual issues.


12 posted on 04/21/2014 7:43:35 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

NAMBLA sees a great opportunity here...


13 posted on 04/21/2014 7:44:12 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

There’s no making the sodomites happy. Ever.

So, don’t even try. Ever.


14 posted on 04/21/2014 7:44:44 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Why doesn’t California just make a list of what is allowed and then make everything else illegal.


15 posted on 04/21/2014 7:53:22 AM PDT by CPOSharky (If a libtards lips are moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
4 Wait. I thought The Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts embraced homosexuality.

Only the youth BA members, for the time being ... but you probably already knew that.

16 posted on 04/21/2014 7:54:36 AM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

How far we have fallen in the last 55 years when the Boy Scout Jamboree was always shown on TV and upheld as an example of good citizenship and leadership.


17 posted on 04/21/2014 7:57:18 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
The purge continues...
I thought we got rid of guilt by association a long time ago.
Just imagine the outcry from the left if Republicans tried anything like this.

18 posted on 04/21/2014 8:00:50 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

the BSA must love their new friends since pissing off Christians and conservatives.


19 posted on 04/21/2014 8:02:46 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Code of Judicial Ethics in California LOL.


20 posted on 04/21/2014 8:29:21 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

By this logic belong to most religion would be banned too.


21 posted on 04/21/2014 8:31:32 AM PDT by tophat9000 (Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Most of the influx isn’t from Mexico city.


22 posted on 04/21/2014 8:38:38 AM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Are they prohibited from joining La Raza or other seditious supremacist groups?


23 posted on 04/21/2014 8:54:33 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

IF ONLY homosexuals could marry, they wouldn’t molest boys. < /sarc >


24 posted on 04/21/2014 8:55:31 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

http://www.courts.ca.gov/6036.htm
Hon. Richard D. Fybel (Chair), Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three

Hon. Kevin A. Enright, Judge Superior Court of California, County of San Diego

Ms. Beth Jay, Principal Attorney to Chief Justice, Supreme Court of California

Hon. Barbara J.R. Jones, Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Five

Hon. Ronni MacLaren, Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

Hon. David Rothman, Retired

Hon. Laurence D. Rubin, Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight

Staff Contact: Mr. Mark Jacobson 415 865-7898

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uu3K1wW-cNU
In 2011 Newt Gingrich at Values Voter Summit – How to Fight Back Against Out-of-Control Judges speech Newt said at the 4:54 mark: “One of the major reasons that I am running for President of the United States is the 9th Circuit Court decision in 2002 that ‘One Nation Under God’ in the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional”

At the 6:48 mark, Newt says: “…because if judges think they are unchallengeable they are inedible corrupt. Corrupted in a moral sense. I don’t mean taking money, but I mean in a sense of arrogance, in the sense of imposing on the rest of us. Whether it is one judge in California deciding he knows more than 8 million Californians about the definition of marriage, whether it is a judge San Antonio who rules that not only can school children can not say a prayer at their graduation, they can not use the word benediction, they can not use the word invocation, they can not use the word God, they can not ask the audience to stand, and if they do any of these things, he will lock up their superintendent.

Now the idea of an American judge becoming a dictator of words is so alien to our tradition, and such a violation of our Constitution as I will explain in a moment, that that judge should be removed from office summarily. “

At the 10:53 mark, Newt says: “Jefferson is the most clear example of taking on the judiciary, in the Judicial Reform Act of 1802, the Jeffersonians eliminated 18 out of 35 federal judges. Didn’t impeach them, just abolish their office and told them to go home.

Now I’m not, let me be clear, I am not as bold as Jefferson. I think the judge in San Antonio would be an important initial signal and I think the 9th Circuit Court should be served notice that it runs the risk of ceasing to exist.”


25 posted on 04/21/2014 9:04:31 AM PDT by Haddit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

That’s what this already is. Homosexuality has all the earmarks of being the official “state” religion of the US and many states. Homosexuality was the defining practice of many pagan religions in the dim past. It’s just come full circle.

Who says there’s a “separation of church and state...?”


26 posted on 04/21/2014 9:07:58 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Of course. The working definition of “religious tolerance” of the left can be summed up as “ABC”

“Anything But Christian”


27 posted on 04/21/2014 9:11:13 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: afsnco

Homosexuality is just a convenient camouflage for the left’s endeavors to criminalize Christianity.


28 posted on 04/21/2014 9:12:10 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Agreed there.. It irritates me when I still see people use ‘gay’.. The queers have changed the definitions of our language for too long :/ (actually, the progressives/Marxists).


29 posted on 04/21/2014 9:15:07 AM PDT by Bikkuri (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

So much for that bit in the Constitution about the freedom of association.


30 posted on 04/21/2014 9:26:24 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Sheer madness.


31 posted on 04/21/2014 9:31:32 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

I remember watching some old movie and they were singing about being gay, meaning happy. I was thinking about how much things have changed in so little time.


32 posted on 04/21/2014 10:03:27 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Loyalty oaths are making a comeback. But while the original ones were designed to neutralize the march of communism in the US, these ones are designed to continue the hoped-for annihilation of Christianity in the US. And what better way to do it than through single-issue judges.


33 posted on 04/21/2014 10:34:27 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Okay if I where a young teenager today I would be all about joining the girl scouts...let me at em.../S


34 posted on 04/21/2014 11:14:31 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

next will be “you can not hold a law license” then “can not be a teacher” next will be “not allowed to go to college”

how very commie agenda.


35 posted on 04/21/2014 12:06:28 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson