Skip to comments.Calif. moves to ban judges affiliated with Boy Scouts
Posted on 04/21/2014 7:26:06 AM PDT by Rusty0604
In a move with major legal implications, The California Supreme Court Advisory Committee on The Code of Judicial Ethics has proposed to classify the Boy Scouts as practicing invidious discrimination against gays, which would end the groups exemption to anti-discriminatory ethics rules and would prohibit judges from being affiliated with the group.
The Committees invitation ignores the fact that the change also encompasses other youth organizations whose membership is limited on the basis of gender, e.g., the Girl Scouts, as well as the military, which continues to practice discrimination on the basis of gender, wrote Catherine Short, legal director of the pro-life group Life Legal Defense Foundation, in a letter to the Committee obtained by TheDC that predicts possible implications for pro-life judges in the future.
Perhaps this is not an unintended consequence, wrote Short.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
We’re going to have scoutmasters do inappropriate things with your boys and you’re going to like it!
However, because Mexico is strong on gay rights, illegal aliens from that country will still be allowed to practice law. Oh wait, they aren’t strong on gay rights.
Wait. I thought The Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts embraced homosexuality.
When will the gay Nazis recognize that in a free country, no one is forced to do what the other wants. But they don’t want a free country, they want one where everyone owes them something, and they intend to collect.
(Just like soebarkah.)
Not good enough I guess. I wonder if they can carry this farther to what religion one is affiliated with?
“major legal implications,”
Yes. This is illegal and unconstitutional. And wrong. Knowing CA it will stand. So now the left goes back and looks at your charitable contributions, your affiliations, your postings.
This is nothing more than forcing people to pass a test of ideology. If the person has any sign of being a normal person, he is blackballed.
Ahhhhhh. A hidden agenda, eh?
No, the Mayor of Mexico City is very pro-homosexual and pushed for the legalization of same-sex marriage.
Please don’t refer to homosexuals as ‘gay’. There is nothing ‘gay’ about their conduct.
So any judge who was a scout is toast?
It’s a purge using the suspension rationality associated with homosexual issues.
NAMBLA sees a great opportunity here...
There’s no making the sodomites happy. Ever.
So, don’t even try. Ever.
Why doesn’t California just make a list of what is allowed and then make everything else illegal.
Only the youth BA members, for the time being ... but you probably already knew that.
How far we have fallen in the last 55 years when the Boy Scout Jamboree was always shown on TV and upheld as an example of good citizenship and leadership.
the BSA must love their new friends since pissing off Christians and conservatives.
Code of Judicial Ethics in California LOL.
By this logic belong to most religion would be banned too.
Most of the influx isn’t from Mexico city.
Are they prohibited from joining La Raza or other seditious supremacist groups?
IF ONLY homosexuals could marry, they wouldn’t molest boys. < /sarc >
Hon. Richard D. Fybel (Chair), Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three
Hon. Kevin A. Enright, Judge Superior Court of California, County of San Diego
Ms. Beth Jay, Principal Attorney to Chief Justice, Supreme Court of California
Hon. Barbara J.R. Jones, Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Five
Hon. Ronni MacLaren, Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
Hon. David Rothman, Retired
Hon. Laurence D. Rubin, Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight
Staff Contact: Mr. Mark Jacobson 415 865-7898
In 2011 Newt Gingrich at Values Voter Summit How to Fight Back Against Out-of-Control Judges speech Newt said at the 4:54 mark: One of the major reasons that I am running for President of the United States is the 9th Circuit Court decision in 2002 that One Nation Under God in the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional
At the 6:48 mark, Newt says: because if judges think they are unchallengeable they are inedible corrupt. Corrupted in a moral sense. I dont mean taking money, but I mean in a sense of arrogance, in the sense of imposing on the rest of us. Whether it is one judge in California deciding he knows more than 8 million Californians about the definition of marriage, whether it is a judge San Antonio who rules that not only can school children can not say a prayer at their graduation, they can not use the word benediction, they can not use the word invocation, they can not use the word God, they can not ask the audience to stand, and if they do any of these things, he will lock up their superintendent.
Now the idea of an American judge becoming a dictator of words is so alien to our tradition, and such a violation of our Constitution as I will explain in a moment, that that judge should be removed from office summarily.
At the 10:53 mark, Newt says: Jefferson is the most clear example of taking on the judiciary, in the Judicial Reform Act of 1802, the Jeffersonians eliminated 18 out of 35 federal judges. Didnt impeach them, just abolish their office and told them to go home.
Now Im not, let me be clear, I am not as bold as Jefferson. I think the judge in San Antonio would be an important initial signal and I think the 9th Circuit Court should be served notice that it runs the risk of ceasing to exist.
That’s what this already is. Homosexuality has all the earmarks of being the official “state” religion of the US and many states. Homosexuality was the defining practice of many pagan religions in the dim past. It’s just come full circle.
Who says there’s a “separation of church and state...?”
Of course. The working definition of “religious tolerance” of the left can be summed up as “ABC”
“Anything But Christian”
Homosexuality is just a convenient camouflage for the left’s endeavors to criminalize Christianity.
Agreed there.. It irritates me when I still see people use ‘gay’.. The queers have changed the definitions of our language for too long :/ (actually, the progressives/Marxists).
So much for that bit in the Constitution about the freedom of association.
I remember watching some old movie and they were singing about being gay, meaning happy. I was thinking about how much things have changed in so little time.
Loyalty oaths are making a comeback. But while the original ones were designed to neutralize the march of communism in the US, these ones are designed to continue the hoped-for annihilation of Christianity in the US. And what better way to do it than through single-issue judges.
Okay if I where a young teenager today I would be all about joining the girl scouts...let me at em.../S
next will be “you can not hold a law license” then “can not be a teacher” next will be “not allowed to go to college”
how very commie agenda.