Skip to comments.David Kear, former Director-General of NZ Scientific Research, says global warming is... (NOT)
Posted on 05/03/2014 8:32:13 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Climate Depot reports on a New Zealand geoscientist who has worked at the highest levels and has just released a detailed statement about why the threat of rising sea-levels has been blown out of all proportions, and An innocent gas, CO2, has been demonized and criminalized.
The widespread obsession with Global-Warming-Climate-Change, in opposition to all factual evidence, is quite incredible.
Kear laments the Astronomical Cost of Major Measures to Combat a Non-Existent Threat.
His scientific caliber: Dr David Kear has a background in geology and engineering, becoming the Director General of the DSIR (Department of Scientific and Industrial Research) in 1980. He is a Fellow and Past Vice-President of the Royal Society of New Zealand, and Past President of the New Zealand Geological Society [which promises to catalogue his work here]. Dr Kear has over 100 publications on New Zealand and Pacific geology, vulcanology and mineral resources. Apparently a foraminifera shell was named after him in 1962.
He has been in this for a very long time.
h/t to Ian for the link to Steven Goddard.
Kear talks about the grave scientific errors he has witnessed, and gives a history of how an absurd idea took hold. I found it very interesting. What I find myself wondering as I read this, is whether he had made any public skeptical statements before, and if not, why not.
During fieldwork for a PhD thesisc I found a coastal exposure of soft sandstone at
Ohuka Creek, south of Port Waikato. There were Pliocene fossils of marine shellfish
below an extensive horizontal bedding plane. Above that plane were more fossils, but
of cool-lovinga plants. A finger could show the exact location of the abrupt change to
the cooler climate at the onset of the first of the world-wide Pleistocene glaciations
[Ice Ages]. Ice formed widely at the ultimate expense of sea water, so sea level fell.
At Ohuka, sea bed had become land. Such changes are rarely seen in a continuous
sequence, so I recorded it in a 1957 scientific paperb. That resulted in my joining an
informal world-wide Group researching changing sea levels.
Most interest then was about the rate of sea level rise as the Earth warmed following
the Little Ice Age. That cool period, from about 1500 to 1700 AD, halted winemaking
in England and taro cropping in New Zealand. Our Group determined the
rate of sea level rise in many different World regions, from widely-available readings
of tide gauges (less variable than those of thermometers). The average for us all was
125 mm/century (125 here). Hence it would take 8 centuries for sea level to rise
1m no serious threat to us.
Global Warming Dawns Subsequently, I attended many international science
conferences representing DSIR, NZ or Pacific Nations. I noted the words Global
Warming appearing increasingly in paper titles, and sensed a growing number of
adherents. Those latter arranged a first-ever Conference on Global Warming in
Vienna in 1985. Unlike most such meetings, where a communiqué summarising
achievements was released on the final day, the full results of this one were delayed
for over 2 years.
When they did appear (front page, NZ Herald, two days before Christmas 1987) a
World Declaration included Overseas scientists have estimated that the seas around
New Zealand will rise by up to 1.4 m in the next 40 years. That article concentrated
on the massive consequent problems, caused by our carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions,
but gave no adequate supporting science. That rate of rise was equivalent to 3,500
mm/century, 28 times faster than our 125. Hence we stupidly ignored it, thinking noone
could possibly believe it. But the World did believe, and the Global Warming
mirage was born. Had 3,500 been true, sea level should have risen by almost 1 m by
today it hasnt, not even closely.
This showed unambiguously that those Overseas Scientists were not true scientists.
They ignored a most important basic rule of true science Thou shall not publish
Science without first checking it. A check against local tide gauges would have
shown how wrong 1.4 m in 40 yrs was; they simply hadnt bothered to check. That
was a First Grave Error.
Australian government scientists were concerned about the effects on Pacific Island
nations by any sea level rise of around 3,500 mm/century, and launched a project to
determine the correct figure at that time. They announced the result at the 1992
meeting of SOPAC a geoscientific organisation of South Pacific nations. Their
figure was 122 mm/century, confirming the order of magnitude of our groups 125
Fooling the World The Global Warmers persisted with their use of pseudo-science
and made further predictions. Understandably they too all proved wrong. At
conferences I began to hear, regardless of the science involved, when a speaker
wished to rubbish some scientific idea or research, he/she stated that conclusion
firmly, and followed it by Just like Global Warming. Clearly the Global Warmers
heard that too. They didnt change their pseudo-science, but cleverly changed the
name to Climate Change. [One can disprove warming, but the words change of
climate cant be proved wrong].
The United Nations became interested major sea level rise could cause havoc in
low-lying areas or island groups. They established an Intergovernmental Panel for
Climate Change (IPCC) and invited nations to send delegates. Not surprisingly those
chosen were almost entirely Global Warmers, because they clearly knew something
about it. But to do them credit the Panel members acted a little more like true
scientists than those earlier.
They accepted that 1.4 m in 40 yrs was wrong and re-evaluated it as 0.49 m by
2100, [roundly a century ahead]. Thus they dropped 3,500 down to 500 mm/century
to 14% of the original. The cause remained unchanged our CO2 emissions to the
atmosphere. In no other human activity would those involved retain a belief when the
most crucial item involved was found to be 86% wrong by themselves. That was a
Second Grave Error.
The New Errors The new value of 0.49 m by 2100 became widely accepted. In
New Zealand, District Councils were instructed by Government Departments, like
Conservation and Environment, and by Regional Councils, that they must take full
account of the risk that 0.49 implied for a sea level rise by 2100. Councils had to
consider that in the same way as earthquake and volcanic risk. Yet that 0.49 value
doesnt stand up to the most simple scientific scrutiny.
First, the rate is four times faster than the current sea level rise, as indicated by
regional, widely-available tide gauges; second, no reason was given for quadrupling
the value, and third, good science interprets 0.49 in this sense as being deliberately
different from 0.48 and 0.50. Thus that effectively claims that those who determined
that value know, for sure, where sea level will be a century ahead to ±5 mm. That
was, and is, patently absurd.
These were the Third, Fourth & Fifth Grave Errors.
Further Damning Disclosures The United Nations appointed me personally to their
UNCSTD Committee which assists small countries with their ability regarding
Science and Technology Development. Three or so of us would go to a central city to
talk and discuss their options with delegates from regional countries. On one
occasion we met in Prague, to assist countries on both sides of the Iron Curtain.
While there, we were invited to visit the Worlds only Institute for Global
Warming. It was founded and funded incredibly by the USA and Soviet Union
jointly, at the height of their Cold War, in an attempt to fund something for the
good of Mankind, rather than for armaments. Some of its staff could have
attended the 1985 Conference, and helped create the 1987 World Declaration.
I took the opportunity of asking to see copies of the documents that had been brought
to that 1985 Meeting in neutral Austria. Several attendees brought their estimates for
sea level rise due to Global Warming. The values, converted to mm/century, ranged
from 500 minimum to 3,500 maximum. There can be no doubt that, to ensure that
their 1987 World Declaration made the greatest impact, they published the maximum
value contravening the most sacred rule of acceptable science Thou shall not publish
items for monetary, political, or personal gain that are not clear un-biased un-inflated
The fact that up to was used, might be allowed in non-scientific areas, but not in
Science. If World Media had distorted the message, the Warmers should immediately
have denied what was wrongly claimed, and ensured that the proper statement got
equal publicity. Using a maximum value for greatest effect was the Sixth (and
Worst) Grave Error.
* * *
Politicians and the Media have listened to the proponents of Global-Warming-
Climate-Change, but dont seem to have made any critical assessment of it all.
Perhaps they were bemused by the Global Warmers constantly naming themselves
and associates as Scientists. As has been shown, those people disregarded the basic
rules of true Science. Their political and media audiences innocently believed the
statements which contained grave errors.
Innocents in politics and the media were badly mis-led. They gladly supported
projects to combat the non-existent threat of Global-Warming-Climate-Change. The
projects were unnecessary because there was no threat; extremely costly in money
time and effort; full of praise where ridicule was deserved misleading about benefits
& options; and above all diversionary away from todays real problems.
A huge international bureaucratic industry was born with Cabinet Ministers,
government departments, company sections, travel, conferences, treaties, carbon
credits, and carbon trading, and very much more. The challenge was often heard that
we must curb our carbon emissions or sacrifice our grandchildrens well-being. In
truth, those children were being saddled with a gigantic debt to pay for everything
encompassed by the Warmers carbon footprints, including the salaries and
expenses of the loudest proponents.
The widespread obsession with Global-Warming-Climate-Change, in opposition to all
factual evidence, is quite incredible. It leads to unfair treatment of some citizens, and
a massive bill for all, for nothing useful. When will citizens revolt effectively against
such callous disregard for their observations and wishes, by those who are essentially
their elected employees? When will the perpetrators examine the basis of their
ideology, and realise that its based on unfounded unscientific beliefs, not on
confirmed, widely-available investigations by real scientists who abide by the moral
standards of their profession?
A very good read! Thanks for posting.
My GW-believing friends won’t believe it though, and most will not even consider reading it!
I keep chirping around the local environs about the propaganda being pushed to the masses,
Good for him!!
It’s cooled off a lot today after two 90 plus days here..
I guess an ice shelf shifted overnight. :-}
A nice summary of how the GW movement came into being.
Not one of the purported 99% who believe in global warming, I gather....
a good read
Was he fired for his stand? Have they stripped him of his titles and awards yet? Go against the "95% of scientists" who believe in AGW and you are labelled a kook, fringe scientist, flat-earth believer, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.