Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They're Not Melting: 87% of Himalayan Glaciers Are ‘Stable’
Cybercast News Service ^ | May 13, 2014 - 12:27 PM

Posted on 05/13/2014 11:55:01 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Nearly 87 percent of Himalayan glaciers are currently “stable,” neither melting nor advancing, according to a new study that cast further doubt on claims that melting glacial ice will help cause a dramatic rise in sea levels this century.

Often referred to as the “Third Pole,” the Himalayans contain “one of the largest concentrations of glaciers outside the polar regions,” according to the study by a group of Indian researchers that was published in the April 2014 edition of “Current Science.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: climatechangehoax; glaciers; globalwarminghoax; himalayas

1 posted on 05/13/2014 11:55:02 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The horses must be very cold.


2 posted on 05/14/2014 12:00:13 AM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Nearly 87 percent of Himalayan glaciers are currently “stable,”

Gore fanboys: “But, but the other 13% is due to global warming right, right??”


3 posted on 05/14/2014 12:01:22 AM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Max, are you blind? Those 13% are the most endangered of them all!

ALL!!!!!!

That’s the problem with you conservatives. You just ignore the obvious to push your “87%” propaganda while completely skipping over the most endangered 13% of glaciers to ever have existed.

They are a minority! Deal with it Max. Deal with the realit...wait...Arent Glaciers white? WE MUST STOP THE OPPRESSION!!! 87% of the glaciers sit there in their gated canyons unconcerned with the suffering of the 13%! WE ARE THE 13%!!!

Those glaciers better check their privilege.


4 posted on 05/14/2014 12:22:31 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The article below from the London Times was printed (I think) on January 17, 2010. It provides some background to the recent findings.

The included link to the Times article no longer works. I copied the text from an online forum.

World misled over Himalayan glacier meltdown

The west Himalayan range includes 15,000 glaciers

(http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6991177.ece)

A WARNING that climate change will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 is likely to be retracted after a series of scientific blunders by the United Nations body that issued it.

Two years ago the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a benchmark report that was claimed to incorporate the latest and most detailed research into the impact of global warming. A central claim was the world's glaciers were melting so fast that those in the Himalayas could vanish by 2035.

In the past few days the scientists behind the warning have admitted that it was based on a news story in the New Scientist, a popular science journal, published eight years before the IPCC's 2007 report.

It has also emerged that the New Scientist report was itself based on a short telephone interview with Syed Hasnain, a little-known Indian scientist then based at Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi.

Hasnain has since admitted that the claim was "speculation" and was not supported by any formal research. If confirmed it would be one of the most serious failures yet seen in climate research. The IPCC was set up precisely to ensure that world leaders had the best possible scientific advice on climate change.

Professor Murari Lal, who oversaw the chapter on glaciers in the IPCC report, said he would recommend that the claim about glaciers be dropped: "If Hasnain says officially that he never asserted this, or that it is a wrong presumption, than I will recommend that the assertion about Himalayan glaciers be removed from future IPCC assessments."


5 posted on 05/14/2014 1:03:21 AM PDT by TChad (The Obamacare motto: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChad
In the past few days the scientists behind the warning have admitted that it was based on a news story in the New Scientist, a popular science journal, published eight years before the IPCC's 2007 report.

Such claims are often captured in the scientific literature as "unpublished observations" or "personal communications." They are used to provide supporting evidence, and are never a major claim.

Research into the global warming hypothesis is an exercise in prediction: when the temperatures increase, we will see this horrible catastrophic event! That is not science. It is inappropriate to make predictions about future events in such a manner, since the basic premise has not been tested. I have yet to see the publication of experimental or observational data supporting the basic premise of human-caused global climate change. Without that, every other claim is bunk.

6 posted on 05/14/2014 2:58:34 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Al Gore said it...so it must be true....

Where can I buy some carbon credits...? / S

Between this nonsense and homosexuality being rammed down our throats...

I’m about to go hiberate until 2016....

If it wasn’t for the new 24 series I would sell my idiot box....


7 posted on 05/14/2014 3:18:23 AM PDT by Popman ("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Bookmark.


8 posted on 05/14/2014 3:53:32 AM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If there is real global warming, how come the Arctic Ocean ice cap has been huge in the past few years and why the ice floe melt on the Great Lakes have been slow this year? (They had trouble running boats to Mackinac Island in Michigan this spring because there was still too much ice in Lake Huron.)


9 posted on 05/14/2014 4:45:14 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

87% are stable, and the other 13% moved to Antarctica.


10 posted on 05/14/2014 6:32:18 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson