Skip to comments.Ohio dad can't have more kids until he pays off child support, court says
Posted on 05/16/2014 11:02:18 AM PDT by Rusty0604
ELYRIA, Ohio An Ohio appeals court has upheld a judge's order that a deadbeat father can't have more kids until he pays his back child support.
In January 2013, Lorain County Probate Judge James Walther said Taylor couldn't have more children while he is on probation for five years.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Or what? Inquiring minds want to know...
That’s interesting. I wonder if they’re also going to start declaring that people on welfare can’t have more children until they get a job and start supporting their families?
Once the Government starts telling people they can’t procreate where does it stop?
Can he at least still practice?
what if he slips up???
So, will the court force his “dates” to abort?
“Can he at least still practice?”
Drag them to abortion clinics?
“Once the Government starts telling people they cant procreate where does it stop?”
It stops when people are monitored/controlled/enslaved from conception until death (or forever with immortality technology).
But he can’t be required to get a photo ID for voting.
Maybe he could teach?
“how? Drag them to abortion clinics?”
Exactly. How are the powers that be thinking that they are going to keep this man from procreating?
But, if they are going to apply this kind of logic to this man’s case, what about all the other “irresponsible procreation” that is occurring. Shouldn’t they address that, too? /s
Do a Bradley Manning on him.
2 bricks and turn your head please
My guess is they’ll throw him in jail. Of course, that presupposes his baby mama puts his name on a birth certificate.
I wonder how many kids he has already?
In this case, I’d vote for him to undergo a vasectomy—even if it had to be paid for with public funds.
I’ve seen one or two times on “Maury” where some of these losers have over 20 children by multiple women.
Look at it this way. These women don’t use protection because many of them want multiple children. They want about 3 or 4 for EITC, SNAP, bigger/better Section 8 housing, AND court orders for child support from the father. Failing actually monetary support from the father, the next step is SSI for the chilluns....
Defendant was heard saying, “No problem, that’s the Biootches job.”
How will they know?
No doubt, having 12 little SSI disability checks rolling in a month allows the Babies Momma weekly hair salon visits, pedicure, manicure appointments and (voice of Bob Barker) a BRAND NEW CAR.
Some of these women claim they don’t know who fathered their child. That way they can get welfare and their boyfriend benefits too.
What about the women?
You must be one of those Republicans waging war on women for even asking that question./sarc
“Bailiff, Whack his pee pee.”
If it keeps going up the judicial ladder, it will never stand. To deny a citizen the right to procreate will not stand. This goes up again the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause. If for some strange and goofy reasoning it does survive, then the gates are opening to be able to simply castrate him and to do other things to prevent a citizen from procreating.
Testicular activity monitor
How to videos?
They gonna tie a knot in it??
I agree with you, but I also think that a person’s right to procreate doesn’t make it my responsibility as a taxpayer to pay for the child. I’m referring to welfare cases more so than people behind in child support.
You need to patent that idea.
The Administration blames military attacks on Youtube video’s.
Please do NOT repeat this idea to Laz.
He's a guy, right? This should NOT be a problem. Generally, it's the female that has the kids...
Three generations of imbeciles are enough.
That is so wrong and shows the caliber of homo saps we are dealing with. I suspect God is truly disappointed in some although his love is eternal. For those who are the big disappointments we, for now, have the RKBA and we best have lots of bullets and practice.
Maybe surrender his paternal rights?