Skip to comments.COULTER: Obama Has Done To America In 8 Years What It Took 100 Years To Happen To British Empire
Posted on 05/16/2014 2:38:26 PM PDT by kingattax
VIDEO AT LINK
Its utterly pathetic and embarrassing, I mean this guy Obama has done to America in 8 years what it took 100 years to happen to the British Empire. We are retreating all over the world - China is about to take total hegemony of the Pacific rim.
We have Israel leaving us. They are moving on now they are pals with China. The Middle East is just falling apart, we lost our power throughout the world and these idiots think that a hashtag is some major policy initiative.
(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...
Jeb Bush will stop the slide! (Snort)
Let’s admit it both Bushes and Clinton did more than their share.
And yet dumb Ann pushes the RINO faction to fix this.
What happened to Coulter?
While he is certainly guilty in this, America has done this to herself.
America’s people, for the most part, have gone utterly insane and completely stupid.
They are obsessed with crap that matter not a hill of beans, and completely ignorant of things that matter more than anything else.
Hard. hard lessons are going to be taught in this country. Whether or not they are learned is anyone’s guess, but my guess is many people in this country today aren’t capable of learning anything at all.
The eastern world it is exploding.
And the media laughed at Dinesh D’Souza.....
His 2016 is more accurate than Nostradamus could ever dream of being...
The story is worse if you use actual math. Obama destroyed this country in 5, not 8 years.
Reagan chose as his running mate Bush I, who is the defacto choice for the Republican ticket after the President terms out if he so chooses. Does that leave Reagan as an accomplice?
china’s probably laughing at us ate the moment...
The Current FReepathon Pays For The Current Quarters Expenses?
And who put 0bama in office? FEMALES!
And she wants to replace Barry with Crispy or Mitt. :-)
Reagan didn't do it on purpose, but it was a terrible mistake.
Didn’t O senior despise the British?
Secondly, the fact that we kept the world safe and allowed the world to prosper is also part of the undoing. The rest of the world has modernized, globalized and want part of the action. Their growth has been driven from our riches in taxes for our military, blood and stupid trade agreements.
And he did it without Vaseline!
so what is your answer ann???
ooohhh, ooohhh, ... i know..
lets vote for socialist lite instead of hard core socialist..
that makes perfect sense..
what a twit..
That’s because in that hundred years, the United Kingdom had no truly evil Prime Ministers, just a few stupid ones.
Coulter has been and continues to be one hundred percent right regarding Republican presidential candidates: it’s a waste of time running anyone except a senator or a governor.
Congressmen don’t win. Businessmen don’t win. Governor Mitt Romney was the last man standing who had a real chance of winning.
I would love to know who you think Coulter should have backed in 2012. Who of that motley crew had a better chance of unseating Obama than Romney?
Governor Palin chose not to run. Congressman Newt Gringrich? Make me laugh.
Our lousy candidates are not Coulter’s fault.
Goes back long before that. Started with establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1914, continued with FDR and carried forth by almost every administration since then. Obama has added more fuel to the mess in a very short period of time.
GOPe. MSM. And people like coulter who pushed Romney very early in the 2012 election season.
Asking again — whom should Coulter have pushed besides Romney?
Who had a better chance of beating Obama? Go all the way back to before the primaries. Before the debates, if you want, and name this mythical Republican savior who had a chance to win, but was thwarted by Coulter and the MSM.
There was no one.
Coulter liked Cain. But she was right when she said he was a businessman and had no realistic chance of winning the presidency. Also, Cain quit.
She liked Gingrich. But she was right when she said he was a congressman, and they have no track record of winning the presidency. She liked Rep. Duncan Hunter, but he had the same problem.
That only senators and governors win the presidency isn’t her opinion — it’s the history of presidential elections in this country.
Governor Perry quit. Santorum quit. Governor Palin chose not to run. Christie (RINO but a governor) chose not to run.
Nobody with a chance to win except Romney stayed in the race. Why is any of this Coulter’s fault?
You guys are mad at Coulter for pointing out electoral realities. It’s raining, and you’re mad at her for giving us the weather report.
We’ve got no one good lined up for 2016. That’s not Coulter’s fault, either.
Right Ann. Push the creator of Romney care. Really. There are always choices Ann.
Use to like you Ann. Shame really. Didn’t see Rush or Hannity or Michele Malkin go to Romney till it was a done deal.
Next election season I will write someone in rather than vote the dark side.
And I believe its time to form a party that’s soul purpose is NOT to be the second party, who are happy losers and love to be toadies to the current Marxist paradigm.
Asking again whom should Coulter have pushed besides Romney?
Who had a chance to win?
By design. He is the worst occupant of the Oval Office. Bar none.
Romney would’ve been a whole lot better than Obama. I don’t like to engage those who continually gripe about the state of affairs by lumping everyone in the same bowl.
The MSM chose for us including vilifying Palin to the point she felt no longer viable. Had the conservative media fought back she might have been a candidate.
Coulter should have backed no one till after the primaries.
I can only thank God for Cruz and (Rand) Paul for the coming election. Though Paul is showing more and more of daddy Ron lately and I am becoming disillusioned by him.
“Next election season I will write someone in rather than vote the dark side.”
Enjoy President Hillary Clinton. I won’t, but you will have inflicted her on me and all conservatives. Thanks a lot.
“Though Paul is showing more and more of daddy Ron lately and I am becoming disillusioned by him.”
Rand Paul is Ron Paul in camouflage.
That’s because the Brits never missed a break for tea and crumpits.
"What difference, at this point, does it make". (Rinse...repeat)
I do believe she will drop out of any future elections thanks to Benghazi. We must keep the harangue up.
. I am beginning to see that Paul might be a doooosh. He did a good job for a while distancing himself from daddy. But it is becoming more obvious
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.