Skip to comments.Mud in the Eye of the So-Called 'Permanent' Drought?
Posted on 05/22/2014 8:29:01 AM PDT by Excellence
"I am on this 'kick' to expose before the fact some of the nonsense being spewed and accepted by what I see as an increasingly desperate AGW crowd. Its now or never for them, though to their credit, they have the political will backing their interests in the form of the EPA that could care less about the fact the departments lines of evidence have nothing to do with reality." Joe Bastardi
(Excerpt) Read more at patriotpost.us ...
The EPA lost all its scientific credibility by the way it handled the second-hand smoke investigation.
Nakedly political results were just inserted when the data refused to produce the “correct” results. Even after extensive statistical torture.
Joe’s post puts everything in one place, and it is very user-friendly.
Excellent presentation by Joe B.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.