Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: re_nortex

If you plan on using zfs I have found by painful experience you need to have an enormous amount of memory. I am currently running with zfs and it takes 20G of memory to really support it well.


4 posted on 05/28/2014 12:31:15 PM PDT by fulltlt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fulltlt
If you plan on using zfs I have found by painful experience you need to have an enormous amount of memory.

I can confirm that's the certainly the case on Linux. The process table has a lot of "z.*" items running for sure when using the zfs filesystem. Since Oracle has ceased open source development on zfs, that's why I've started exploring btrfs as an alternative.

I really like the ease of handling boot environments in Solaris with the beadm tool (written in Python, by the way) and am seeking something roughly akin to that with btrfs in Linux land.

While the zfs on Linux crew is doing a laudable job, their last release is from August 2013 whereas btrfs is more recent, albeit a fast-moving target.

7 posted on 05/28/2014 12:44:01 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson