IT'S GO TIME!
Less than $4.9k to go!!
Posted on 05/31/2014 5:36:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Gawker published a piece on the neurological problems which might result in pedophilia, and naturally a lot of shock and disgust was triggered. The piece is titled Born This Way: Sympathy and Science for Those Who Want to Have Sex with Children. This isn’t something you want to click through to lightly. So fair warning. The neurobiological material did pique my interest:
“There was nothing significant in the frontal lobes or temporal lobes,” says Cantor. “It turned out the differences weren’t in the grey matter. The differences were in the white matter.”
“The white matter” is the shorthand term for groupings of myelinated axons and glial cells that transmit signals throughout the gray matter that composes the cerebrum. Think of the gray matter like the houses on a specific electricity grid and the white matter like the cabling connecting those houses to the grid.
“There doesn’t seem to be a pedophilia center in the brain,” says Cantor. “Instead, there’s either not enough of this cabling, not the correct kind of cabling, or it’s wiring the wrong areas together, so instead of the brain evoking protective or parental instincts when these people see children, it’s instead evoking sexual instincts. There’s almost literally a crossed wiring.”
The good news, according to Cantor, is that it if they can figure out how the wiring gets crossed, they might be able to suggest ways pregnant mothers can help ensure their baby is unlikely to be born a pedophile. “It is quite possible that one or more components of the process are related to prenatal stresses like poor maternal nutrition, toxin exposure, ill health, or poor health care,” he says. “If so, then improving health and health care in general may reduce the numbers of people vulnerable to developing pedophilia, as well as other problems.”
Fair enough as far as that goes. I think it is important to look at controversial and explosive topics objectively. You don’t always need to be objective about the issue at hand, or lack opinions, but you need to step back and analyze in a value-free manner on occasion. For me the confusing thing is that to my knowledge Gawker today takes conventionally Leftish stances on “nature vs. nurture” type issues. Would they post something by Steven Pinker defending the concept of robust behavioral differences between the sexes? So why are they sticking their necks out here?
In any case, I think the problem with the Gawker piece is that it doesn’t really come off as a cold and rational assessment. Rather, there is genuine sympathy for people who are afflicted with the mental disease of pedophilia. The author finishes:
The old adage is that the true mark of a society is how it treats the weakest in its ranks. Blacks, women, Latinos, gays and lesbians, and others are still in no way on wholly equal footing in America. But they’re also not nearly as lowly and cursed as men attracted to children. One imagines that if Jesus ever came to Earth, he’d embrace the poor, the blind, the lepers, and, yes, the pedophiles. As a self-professed “progressive,” when I think of the world I’d like to live in, I like to imagine that one day I’d be OK with a man like Terry moving next door to me and my children. I like to think that I could welcome him in for dinner, break bread with him, and offer him the same blessings he’s offered me time and again. And what hurts to admit, even knowing all I know now, is that I’m not positive I could do that.
I’m not a professed “progressive.” I can see where the author is coming from probably (and so can Jonathan Haidt)…but can my progressive readers get into his mind here? Does being progressive mean you can not take into account probability to any extent? That you need to treat people as singular individuals in even the most extreme cases? For example, in the case of a pedophile who has never acted upon their instincts one presumes that they could find social acquaintances who were childless. Many biological dispositions aren’t deterministic, they’re probabilistic. That means controlling or channeling them in non-destructive ways entails changing the situations and contexts one is placed it. That’s not unjust, that’s just common sense. You aren’t a bad person to think it is prudent that someone with pedophile urges should avoid developing close friendships with people with young children.
Many of my liberal readers and friends have expressed the position that if a hereditarian position was true for a range of issue that that would result in a lot of unpleasant normative and political downstream consequences. I’m generally skeptical of this position. I have plenty of hereditarian ideas, and believe it or not I’m not a hateful Nazi. But the response above to the possibility that pedophilia has a biological basis does make me reconsider. I’m not a neo-Freudian, so I had always assumed that this behavior and tendency had neurobiological roots. That didn’t make me any more sympathetic to individuals who committed unmentionable acts. The world isn’t fair, unfortunately.
*ouch*
No one was born to sin. That’s like saying you were born to kite checks or be a murderer, etc. God didn’t make us that way.
While others back into it.
The short answer which we discovered from more studies, exams and interviews with psychiatrists when I was a Prosecutor than I care to count is ... yes.
Here we go down the road to normalization of pedophilia.
The normalization of homosexuality assures us that we will have more pedophiles abusing more children, causing us to have more homosexuals and pedophiles in the future. Convoluted genetic explanations aren’t necessary.
RE: The short answer which we discovered from more studies, exams and interviews with psychiatrists when I was a Prosecutor than I care to count is ... yes.
So, what is it? Is it genetic?
If so, have they identified the gene?
RE: No one was born to sin.
“Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.” (Psalms 51:5)
Who could have saw this coming?
O yeah, every one of us that have taken a stand against the normalization of the homosexuals.....
The whole idea that one is “born that way” which confers the idea that one has no choice or freewill in how they behave sexually ultimately leads to pedophiles, rapists, and all forms of sexual deviants and bad behavior being encompassed under the umbrella of an immutable trait that can not be helped. I’ve been warning that this is where this stupidity was leading. It is an attack on the basic concept on which all notions of liberty are founded which is self determination and freewill.
What we are seeing is an erosion of the foundation of a free society in the name of misguided equality. No longer are individuals assumed to be responsible for their behavior but instead a circus of excuses are presented many which are laughable. Human beings are not little dogs that can not pass fire hydrants without marking territory. That some think that civil society should set such a low bar for sexual behavior is like declaring open season for sexual criminals. They no longer evil or deviant but instead just following their God given nature.
The defect at the core of this is that human beings have proven with the advent of civilization that they can learn to control their behavior and modify their response through self reflection and consideration of right and wrong behavior. Human beings are born with the natural urge to defecate but they learn to control where and when they defecate. Human beings are born to desire to eat but they learn not to eat poison or inedible things. Human beings are born with natural tendency to get angry, to be scared but they learn to control reactions to these emotions.
The idea that sex is some how different is just ridiculous and is an expression of a desire for license to carry on sexually with disregard to any moral code or limit. Even primitive tribes don’t behave this way and for good reason because civilization becomes impossible without men and women who see self control and responsibility as cornerstones as a component of their lives. Learning to defer reactive desire or forgo it entirely is how one chooses not to murder, not to rape, not to steal, not to cheat, not to do all those things that abridge the rights of others.
One may be born with the ability to desire to sniff or eat glue but a person with free will can choose not to do those things. A person is born with the capacity for sexual desire but they can choose when and where and who and under what circumstances they will indulge that desire. Those who promote Pedophilia, Homosexuality, and Transexuality are like someone choosing to eat the glue proudly or crap their pants proudly. They know that sticking forks in electric sockets isn’t wise but they do it anyway and demand everyone clap for them approvingly. The worst part is they have built up this superiority complex as if this is “evolved” behavior as if mutilating ones sexual equipment is “evolved” when the evolved thing would be to change the way they think about their irrational desire to be something they were not born to be. The evolved behavior is to see you are male or female and make the best of it and stop trying to be what you weren’t born to be. As for those who have pedophile desires they should know that it is wrong and just not hurt children. A society that lessens the stigma for such behavior is not being enlightened but instead regressing to a level of the savage and setting the stage for even greater victimization of the innocent.
RE: The “little ones” Jesus is referring to are not children, but believers. It’s a common diminutive, a term of endearment.
______________________________
That might be the case in Luke 17, but in Matthew 18, it is written:
At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” 2 And calling to him a child, he put him in the midst of them 3 and said, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. 4 Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
5 “Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me,
6 but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.
The “little ones” there surely would include the child in verse 2.
The answer is simple....it's a choice.Same sex...kids...animals...it's a choice.
!
That's a gem.
“Born This Way: Sympathy and Science for Those Who Want to Rape Children” .....fixed it
Betcha the second one thinks twice, if applied correctly. They still won’t suffer as long as their victims, though.
Well said!!
The road to acceptance of homosexuality was its removal from the psychiatric diagnostic manual. When it no longer meant you were crazy, we could look for biological and not mental illness causes.
Once they could say you were born that way, it becomes an inherent trait and the demands for tolerance and civil rights in the racial minority tradition began.
To make pedophilia acceptable, first they have to remove it as a mental disorder. Finding a biological cause, AKA born that way, is a first step to normalizing and tolerating it.
Give it a year or two and you'll be a "bigot" for opposing pedophilia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.