Skip to comments.You will join the freedom of religion witch hunt ... or else
Posted on 06/03/2014 1:09:41 PM PDT by massmike
First, same-sex marriage activists said you will be punished if you don't want to participate in a same-sex wedding (e.g., the New Mexico photographer in Elane Photography v. Willock).
Then they said you'll be punished if you simply support the definition of marriage as a man and a woman (e.g., Brendan Eich, the Benham brothers).
But the same-sex marriage movements appetite for McCarthyism is insatiable. Now were learning that, even if you publicly support same-sex marriage, youll still be punished if you think other people should not be punished for believing marriage is between a man and a woman.
You'll even be punished if you don't think people should be forced to buy other people's abortions.
University of Virginia law professor Douglas Laycock, a same-sex marriage supporter and one of the leading First Amendment scholars in the country, is the latest victim of the same-sex marriage movement's smear campaign.
Activists are demanding that he release his academic e-mail and cell phone records from discussions he had with people who support traditional man-woman marriage and religious liberty.
Laycock earned these activists scorn because he signed a scholars letter saying that both sides of the marriage issue should have religious and intellectual freedom of conscience.
And he also filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties cases arguing for religious liberty against Obamacare's mandate that religious objectors buy early abortion pills and birth control for other people.
In other words, the same-sex marriage and abortion movements are targeting Laycock because he favors tolerance. The pressure is even indirectly targeted at the president of U.Va., who media point out happens to be Laycocks wife.
Laycocks attackers claim they arent against academic freedom, but that is a sham. As professors Stephen Bainbridge and Jonathan Adler point out, probing the emails, cell phone records and legal discussions of a professor is inherently hostile to academic freedom.
Laycock and his wife are both being given the same ultimatum Brendan Eich received: Recant, or lose your ability to do your job.
There is a gay mafia, quipped Bill Maher recently, If you cross them, you do get whacked.
Recently over 50 pro-same-sex marriage scholars and intellectuals wrote a public letter calling it intolerant to punish Eich for believing in man-woman marriage.
The attack on Laycock shows that each one of those authors is now endangered by the same-sex marriage and abortion movements pogrom merely because they wont pick up torches themselves.
Libertarians beware. When you endorsed the movement to redefine marriage, perhaps you didn't realize those same activists have no qualms about redefining liberty itself.
Coercion is the new freedom for the same-sex marriage and abortion movements. Thuggery to force people to participate in other peoples same-sex weddings, abortions, and birth control is the new non-discrimination.
Merely-tolerant allies of same-sex marriage and abortion promoters will soon find themselves discarded into the ash heap of history, along with the millennia of world cultures who have affirmed male-female complementarity and the dignity of human life.
How the attacks on a University of Virginia law professor are bad for academia, and all of us.
Well, this is why you never give rights to degenerates because once you do that then they use those rights to attack the rights of normal people.
>> Libertarians beware. When you endorsed the movement to redefine marriage, perhaps you didn’t realize those same activists have no qualms about redefining liberty itself.
The modern-day Libertarian is an idiot — supporting iron fisted enforcement of state sanctioned sodomy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.