Skip to comments.California Liberals Pass Bill to Regulate Sex....(Control Freaks)
Posted on 06/06/2014 10:00:05 AM PDT by Beave Meister
bill that has just passed the California State Senate could effectively make criminals out of many people- just for having sex.
The bill, SB 967, would require affirmative consent before college-age couples can have sex. This would essentially outlaw sex that is had while in the heat of passion.
From Breitbart News:
SB 967, amended last week by state Sen. Kevin de Leon (D-Los Angeles), would mandate that college students obtain an affirmative, unambiguous, and conscious decision by each participant to engage in mutually agreed-upon sexual activity. ..
Obviously, there is a problem, he said in the report. SB 967 will change the equation so the system is not stacked against survivors by establishing an affirmative consent policy to make it clear that only yes means yes.
According to the language of the bill, consent must be ongoing throughout a sexual encounter, and can be revoked at any time. The existence of a dating relationship between the persons involved, or the fact of past sexual relations between them, should never by itself be assumed to be an indicator of consent.
(Excerpt) Read more at ijreview.com ...
It's got to be ongoing consent, too. Does he keep asking, you still good, you still good?
Man: this is ANNOYING.
Woman: How'm I supposed to concentrate with this chooch bugging me the whole time?
Woman: Ok, it's working, I think it's working. Yes? Yes! Yes!
Man: (interrupts) can you write that down here?
Original title: California Liberals Pass Bill to Regulate Sex and Show America the Control Freaks They Really Are
Wasn’t there a Saturday Night Live skit on this several years.. or maybe even decades ago?
And yet these same people probably would like to make homo sex mandatory.
Sex between two or three liberals should be a hanging offense for all parties involved.
Hey guys...What a great blackmail tool.....
Q: Hey good lookin’. What’s your sign?
Q: Are you willing to document that?
It seems like only a few years back when Californicate declared that butt sex had to be legalized because that’s what Americans want.
Just dont have sex in California.
They’re bringing insane college campus rules to the general populace. What a zoo.
We could call it... hmmmm... hmmm....
Isn’t this the 30 caliber clip/ 30 magazine clip guy?
Yep, that’s him.
Representing his people well.
I’m sure the California Bar will write up the necessary documents for all parties to execute and have notarized before the sex takes place. It will probably have a check list of sexual acts you can select. Like a menu.
Not being in the dating environment, and not being in California, it’s going to be fun to watch how this plays out.
First drive out the porn industry by require a rubber law now this. Has CA become a modern day Mass Bay Colony?
So, if neither party raises the issue verballly, which one gets charged? Or do the both get charged?
I find this amusing.
All this could be avoided by simply avoiding the sin of fornication?
By the way this only applies to straight couples.
Queers can do anything they want, anywhere they want, any time they want, with or without consent.
If you're queer and black, you can pretty much control the world.
You know regulate means profit from. I guess some liberals are about to band together to sell underground, “off-the-radar”, access to sex services or pornography. Hell they’re the most sex-crazed demographic on the planet. They’re the ones trying to stuff sex organs where they don’t belong like dogs in heat. This will not go over well among their own kind. We won’t have to say a thing.
I find this profoundly amusing.
check on LegalZoom.com they may already be all over this.
Correction - it only applies to straight MALES.
Naw, just deny them AIDS meds. The results will be the same.
Thanks for pointing out there is a bright side: the sheer entertainment value.
Yes, I’m sure the perusers of the homo meat market in San Francisco will abide by this to the “T”.
Ah.. College-age.. Disregard my previous.
It would still be non-binding agreement.
In another article, a college handbook says that breaking up with a girl because she won’t have sex is an act of coercion.
She could just claim that she signed the agreement under duress because the relationship would end.
Interesting how Leftists were successful in overthrowing the in loco parentis responsibilities of colleges/universities. Now one has co-ed dorm rooms, no curfews, free flowing alcohol, and plenty of sex; now there is no such thing as a ole fashion date. Of course, for some reason the Left failed to recognize that sometimes nasty things happen in the environment or with no rules messages get confused. Now instead of perhaps reimposing some rules we get this legalized remedy and star chamber on campus judicial proceedings. This is the story of the Left. They push liberation and throwing out tradition then when the inevitable bad stuff happens they start imposing the power of the state as a remedy.
sexpolice, bigbrother, lavendermafia, antibreeder
Can't do that. The push is now on to protect those with AIDS from ever having to disclose that detail to sex partners or even their children.
For now, perhaps. There are still charges of rape withing the confines of marriage. It'll apply to all hetero couples someday.
Sorry, keyword post...
Okay, so...let’s just say that a young man and young woman meet in club one Saturday night after consuming several adult liquid beverages and become intoxicated — And let’s say for the sake of argument that they go back to her place — Break out the forms and our two drunks sign them and do the deed.
Now what? Boinking under the influence...who will be at fault.
If women are frustrated about men not being men and “going after it” now, what in the hell do they think this is going to do to men when this takes effect.
I’m assuming that we will only encourage average men to sit at home on the weekend playing x-box, smoking weed, drinking beer, watching porn/wacking off, eating pizza, and avoiding women at all costs.
The men that are already dogs will continue to do what they do because that is what they do...Soooooooo, net result, women become more frustrated with the lack of men.
What is the net positive for young men and women?
You have been proven correct.
Bill should be titled the “All Men Are Presumed Rapists” bill...
As I said earlier to another poster as well as several times before, people/conservatives have a choice. They can sat and help propagate this insanity with their tax dollars or they can leave these communist hellholes.
Your material goods can be sold to an idiot liberal. You can find places to care for your sick relatives in a more rational state. There is no excuse to stay. People in Europe left with the clothes on their backs.
People in California can too. Your sanity and your family will be better off for it.
The man. Of course.
This bill was authored by a man.
Cherry 2000 gets closer
BTW, are the forms going to be printed in Spanish, Hindu, Farsi, Korean, Russian, Ebonic, Tagalo, etc?
Does one need a signature from a blowup/artficial partner?
Yeah...sort of...not the most manly looking man I might add.
I didn’t bother to look. It’s California, after all.
“Forget it Jake, it’s Californiatown”
If you are not here after what I am here after, then you are going to be here after I am gone.
remember it is the evil Republicans who want to monitor and control what happens in the bedroom...
I never asked any girl for permission.
I just let em do whatever they want...
Ridiculous....and set ups moronic jeopardy, where none should exist.
We already have laws for abuse and rape.
California here I come. NOT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.