Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mad Michelle -- More Than Fed Up With “Idiot” Prez
National Enquirer ^ | June 17, 2014 | National Enquirer Staff

Posted on 06/17/2014 5:25:32 PM PDT by Maceman

A fed up Michelle Obama is outraged that her husband’s widely criticized prisoner exchange could wreck her political ambitions – and she’s blasted him as an “idiot,” say sources.

“Michelle was so furious about the public backlash that she sarcastically asked him, ‘Whose side are you on?’” revealed a Washington insider. “She not only believes he made a dumb decision but also thinks it will negatively affect her post-White House career.

“She’s contemplating a run for Senate in her home state of Illinois, but after the prisoner exchange, she said it looks like the only speeches she’ll be making now will be to people wondering how she stayed married to ‘That idiot.’”

The furor erupted after Obama authorized freeing five high-ranking Taliban terrorists for U.S. Army captive Bowe Bergdahl, whom some suspect of being a deserter.

Many congressmen shared the first lady’s outrage, but the president refused to acknowledge he made a mistake.

“I’m never surprised by controversies that are whipped up in Washington,” the commander in chief fired back at critics.

The political brawl comes at a terrible time for Michelle, who some see as the only potential candidate powerful enough to unseat Illinois Republican Sen. Mark Kirk.

But a political observer noted: “The vicious attack on the Bergdahl exchange could ruin any political hopes Mrs. Obama has – and it’s got her thinking maybe she should walk out on Barack even before he leaves office.”

The ENQUIRER has closely tracked the Obamas’ troubled 21-year marriage – and disclosed that Michelle has an explosive dossier on her husband’s alleged cheating that could be used in a divorce action.

Said the insider: “It’s just a matter of when she pulls the trigger.”


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: punkd
Warning -- large close-up photo of Michelle's face at the link.
1 posted on 06/17/2014 5:25:32 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Thanks for the warning—not going there.
2 posted on 06/17/2014 5:30:32 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
A fed up Michelle Obama is outraged that her husband’s widely criticized prisoner exchange could wreck her political ambitions...

A silver lining.

3 posted on 06/17/2014 5:31:04 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Well, The National Enquirer is as credible as any other outlet of the Men Seeking Men media.


4 posted on 06/17/2014 5:31:14 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

He's a fish-eyed ol' fool.

5 posted on 06/17/2014 5:32:06 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Harvey Dent, can we trust him?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBsdV--kLoQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

That fish eyed fool did WHAT?

7 posted on 06/17/2014 5:34:08 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

A sham story meant to distance and insulate herself from his decision.


8 posted on 06/17/2014 5:36:02 PM PDT by socal_parrot (I hate to say I told you so, but...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

The Enquirer or the National Inquirer? WOW, are we now giving credibility to a rumor rag? True or not, it’s the source I’m questioning.


9 posted on 06/17/2014 5:42:48 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

I looked, believe me, you made a good decision.


10 posted on 06/17/2014 5:42:55 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
It IS the Enquirer, which reduces believability to somewhere in the decimals of a percentage point. However, if the malignant crook were to actually think she had a chance of being elected, she's using crack.

Her husband has brought this country to the edge of Civil War. I hope it doesn't wind up like Clara Petacci...

11 posted on 06/17/2014 5:43:41 PM PDT by jonascord (Laeti vescimur nos subacturis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman


12 posted on 06/17/2014 5:44:38 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Michelle angry?

Im surprised


13 posted on 06/17/2014 5:45:26 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

Didn’t the National Enquirer come up with a legitimate John Edwards scoop a few years ago?

.


14 posted on 06/17/2014 5:47:09 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Chopper haz the PMS???
15 posted on 06/17/2014 5:49:03 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Thank you for the warning. Her face is going to freeze like that one of these days. She doesn’t seem able to unscowl.


16 posted on 06/17/2014 5:50:33 PM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

Yeah the Enquirer is only slightly higher then MSNBC, CBS, ABC, or CNN in credibility.


17 posted on 06/17/2014 5:51:57 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
.....giving credibility to a rumor rag? True or not, it’s the source I’m questioning

If this had been their sister publication "The Globe" I might agree, but remember this is the tabloid that broke the Ted Kennedy Chappaquiddick story, the Monica/Bill scandal and the John Edwards affair and love child. Rumor source or not they're batting almost 10000.

18 posted on 06/17/2014 5:55:39 PM PDT by mupcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mears

The National Enquirer very often has stories that sound ridiculous but turn out to be true. I always read the front page when I’m standing in the grocery store checkout line.


19 posted on 06/17/2014 5:58:14 PM PDT by originalbuckeye (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

The nation has already suffered under
The-Queer-In-Charge,. We do not need
to suffer under his sodom-mate’s partner,
Michael.


20 posted on 06/17/2014 6:05:03 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye; Kackikat; Mears; mupcat
The National Enquirer very often has stories that sound ridiculous but turn out to be true.


21 posted on 06/17/2014 6:05:19 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

The National Inquirer sank John Edwards, didn’t it?


22 posted on 06/17/2014 6:14:24 PM PDT by gigster (Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Grrrrrrrr...
23 posted on 06/17/2014 6:27:45 PM PDT by JPG (Yes We Can morphs into Make It Hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

Let me just say “Bruno Magli Shoes”, OJ trial, Enquirer was only publication or media source to investigate deeply enough to publish a picture of him wearing the “ugly a$$ shoes” he claimed he never owned. A bloody footprint of a Magli shoe, his size, was found at the scene of the crime, and others had seen him wearing them prior to the murders. Helped find him responsible for the murders at the civil trial.


24 posted on 06/17/2014 6:28:15 PM PDT by Mjaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
She’s contemplating a run for Senate in her home state of Illinois

Well at least she's not going to carpet-bag like Hillary.

Mark Kirk's term is up 2016 so that would be the obvious target. I'm sure the Chicago Mob would get her over the top.

That would set her up for a run for POTUS after Hillary (or whichever Dem wins in 2016) leaves in 2024.

25 posted on 06/17/2014 6:44:19 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Ha Ha!!!!


26 posted on 06/17/2014 7:06:06 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mjaye; mupcat; driftdiver; Mears; UCANSEE2; gigster

Okay..I will concede there are at least seven important issues that the Enquirer got right FIRST. Twenty years ago...not so much...that is why I do not read it. So on the points you made...you win.

However, there are so many articles that are impossible to believe...aliens, Sarah Palin affair, and smear tactics against good people for sensationalism...it sells papers.

I would however need confirmation from a source I thought reliable. I do agree that ‘truth is truth, even if comes from a donkey’...God has used donkeys to get his message out. So maybe The Enquirer is a better news tool than it used to be.


27 posted on 06/17/2014 7:21:27 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

I mentioned The Enquirer just to say they are occasionally right.

I learned they were correct about Edwards here on F.R.

I have never read the paper and don’t plan to.

.


28 posted on 06/17/2014 7:25:58 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Actually though I don’t read it, the National Enquirer is gaining a reputation as having reputable reporters.

More than I can say for NYT or Post or Philly Enquirer/Intelligencer or , well you get my point.


29 posted on 06/17/2014 7:42:01 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mears

I was glad to know that The Enquirer had gotten a lot of scandals right, that was something I had not kept track of, thanks.


30 posted on 06/17/2014 8:58:42 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Woodward and Bernstein was asked on the CBS Sunday Morning Show if anyone did old-fashioned investigative reporting. He sheepishly said, “Well, with the internet and all the technology, things happen so fast—no, we just don’t have the time.” THEY JUST DON’T HAVE THE TIME TO INVESTIGATE BENGHAZI, IRS, SOLYNDRA, SOROS, FAST AND FURIOUS, IMMIGRATION BREAKDOWN—the list is endless.


31 posted on 06/18/2014 3:44:31 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

” “It’s just a matter of when she pulls the trigger.”
Boy, any comment I make here on this statement will only get me an authoritarian visit.
But HEY, I’m rooting for her.


32 posted on 06/18/2014 4:10:55 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Warning -- large close-up photo of Michelle's face at the link.

I'll take your word for it.


33 posted on 06/18/2014 4:12:47 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Umm...Illinois is a no fault state. Thus, cheating doesn’t do a damn thing for her. Libs will think Barack is cool for cheating. Cons already dislike the guy. No gain. Thus this article is. BS. Fun to wish though.


34 posted on 06/18/2014 4:15:36 AM PDT by Solson (The Voters stole the election! And the establishment wants it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Didn’t the National Enquirer come up with a legitimate John Edwards scoop a few years ago?

<><><>

Nothing screams credibility more than folks being able to come up with exactly one legit story in the entire history of a publication.


35 posted on 06/18/2014 7:21:57 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson