Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Further Down The Rabbit Hole -- Facebook's 56 Gender Options
Original Content | 6/24/2014 | By Laz A. Mataz

Posted on 06/24/2014 8:16:23 AM PDT by Lazamataz

As a very young man, your humble author thought to experiment around with psychedelic drugs. The utter lack of connection to reality was very profound, and very scary. However, when the drugs wore off, reality returned.

These days, American reality is so bizarre as to be similar to the psychedelic unreality experienced so many decades ago. In many ways, it is very similar to Alice in Wonderland, and her journey down the rabbit hole. "Curiouser and curiouser," we observe, as America spirals into a state of being in full flight from reality.

The example I am focusing on, today, is the utterly bizarre decision of Facebook to change the gender self-identification from the choices of male, female, or other (which is a little odd, itself) to FIFTY-ONE, count them, FIFTY-ONE gender choices. The list includes: Agender, Androgyne, Androgynous, Bigender, Cis, Cisgender, Cis Female, Cis Male, Cis Man, Cis Woman, Cisgender Female, Cisgender Male, Cisgender Man, Cisgender Woman, Female to Male, FTM, Gender Fluid, Gender Nonconforming, Gender Questioning, Gender Variant, Genderqueer, Intersex, Male to Female, MTF, Neither, Neutrois, Non-binary, Other, Pangender, Trans, Trans*, Trans Female, Trans* Female, Trans Male, Trans* Male, Trans Man, Trans* Man, Trans Person, Trans* Person, Trans Woman, Trans* Woman, Transfeminine. Transgender, Transgender Female, Transgender Male, Transgender Man, Transgender Person, Transgender Woman, Transmasculine, Transsexual, Transsexual Female, Transsexual Male, Transsexual Man, Transsexual Person, Transsexual Woman, and Two-Spirit.

This is insane. There are more flavors of gender, according to Facebook, then there are flavors of ice cream at Baskin-Robbins. To my mind, there should be exactly three gender options:

America is alone in the world with this new, strange, 1960's-Radical-driven divorce with reality. The world must look at us in a semi-stunned disbelieving awe, questioning to themselves: "How did our rich uncle lost his mind?"

I feel that the best way to demonstrate to an insane person (or in our case, culture) that they are insane, is to dive deeper into their insanity and one-up them. In that vein, I offer Facebook a new gender label, that of Quantum Gender with Nanosecond Variability. I will define Quantum Gender with Nanosecond Variability thus:

A person is neither male, nor female, but is in a quantum 'probability state' of maleness or femaleness, until the gender is actually observed. At that time the quantum field collapses into a true gender of male or female. However, the quantum field state returns every nanosecond, so one can never quite be sure of the gender from nanosecond to nanosecond. Be aware that -- like Schrodinger's Cat -- the act of observing the person's gender influences the outcome of their gender.

My gender is hereby declared to be 'Quantum Gender with Nanosecond Variability', and if Facebook does not recognize me, they are discriminating against me. OFF MY BACK, OPPRESSOR!


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: facebook; gender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: Lazamataz

“Robosexual” available as per Futurama?


2 posted on 06/24/2014 8:18:42 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

at first I thought it was FB’s attempt at humor and satire


3 posted on 06/24/2014 8:18:49 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Last night it was 51 options.

At this rate of increase we’ll hit 1000 real soon.


4 posted on 06/24/2014 8:19:43 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (You can count my felonies by looking at my FR replies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I thought you were sent on vacation????


5 posted on 06/24/2014 8:19:51 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty; CatherineofAragon; melissa_in_ga; Slings and Arrows; Responsibility2nd; ...
The Official Lazamataz Sometimes-Funny, Sometimes-Disturbing Ping List
252 Satisfied Customers!™


Credit for original picture to The Oatmeal

6 posted on 06/24/2014 8:21:33 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Lazamataz; pansgold; foolynyah

Yes, turns out that Pansgold the credit card fraudster is also the nuked troll foolynyah.


7 posted on 06/24/2014 8:22:40 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Vacations end. The beach was nice.


8 posted on 06/24/2014 8:23:40 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Vomit ....

Disgusting picture of a mutilated crazy woman who impregnated herself with the result of some deranged dude wanking into a turkey-baster.


9 posted on 06/24/2014 8:24:35 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Okay, Okay. I’ve come to terms with myself and at great risk, I have announcement to make:

In these times of denial of oneself and suppression of your identity, it has become apparent that I must take a stand and being a man of convictions, not wanting anymore ambiguity in my life and to clear any confusion, least my life be co-opted by the homosexual lobby I am declaring my love for all things women(cept that talking on and on forever about what I don’t know and the hugging afterward when I just want to go to sleep).

I Am A Heterosexual!

Yep, don’t be surprised. I am guessing a good many of you knew this already but, there it is.

I don’t find men attractive in any way shape or form. Not that there would be anything wrong that....

I know some of you may judge me harshly due to your convictions and sense of moral superiority, perhaps because of your spiritual enlightenment and I’m okay with that.

I will say that there have been times, in the middle of an argument with my girlfriend, I wished she was a man so I could end the idiocy being spewed. But, that just wouldn’t be sporting, fair and besides, It’s just plain gross.

I’ll take the ear piercing shrills of the softer part of man over a hairy nipple anyday. Well, I’ll clarify: there have been some pretty hot European women who needed to shave and I was attracted to them, for a moment.

Still, my Hetero identity and American snobbery won out and I never ventured relations with Bruna.

So, flame suit on. Excoriate me if you must but, I know who I am.

PS Laz, you are my hero but, that’s as far as our bromance will ever go.

I like hips, lips and @#4ts...


10 posted on 06/24/2014 8:24:52 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

11 posted on 06/24/2014 8:27:13 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I wish Facebook had included Robosexual.


12 posted on 06/24/2014 8:27:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

What is ‘CIS’?...................................{or do I not want to know?}......................


13 posted on 06/24/2014 8:28:33 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,735 threads and 84,728 replies, as of 06-20-2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Zuckerberg is either certifiably insane-stupid or insane-hubristic manipulative.

These rich people like Bloomberg really have an ego problem in playing people to their lecturing themselves to ridiculous behaviors and insane “social” antisocial anti communicative demands.

Welcome to the mindless mind locker of Facebook... Pure trash that grows nothing to threaten the vanity of these people.


14 posted on 06/24/2014 8:28:35 AM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

how do I follow someone on here?


15 posted on 06/24/2014 8:29:17 AM PDT by MNDude (In Heaven pizza is from Chicago and there are no politicians. In Hell...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I think th e real question is, which subset of the 51 options would Laz hit?


16 posted on 06/24/2014 8:29:37 AM PDT by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Their loss!


17 posted on 06/24/2014 8:29:52 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

You ask to be put on my Ping List.


18 posted on 06/24/2014 8:29:55 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
What is ‘CIS’?...................................{or do I not want to know?}......................

Curiously, CIS refers to us normal people. We are 'Cis Male' or 'Cis Female'.

To quote some insane lady:

"Cis- all of these terms capture that a person is not trans or does not have a gender diverse identity or presentation."

19 posted on 06/24/2014 8:33:05 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Sorry, but how do I do that.

Do your articles ever discuss ugly women and which ones you would hit? I think that would be a popular topic.


20 posted on 06/24/2014 8:40:10 AM PDT by MNDude (In Heaven pizza is from Chicago and there are no politicians. In Hell...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Cis- all of these terms capture that a person is not trans or does not have a gender diverse identity or presentation.

All of them, of course.

And Robosexuals, too.

Sexy robots

21 posted on 06/24/2014 8:41:27 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
You are the 253rd Satisfied Customer!™
22 posted on 06/24/2014 8:44:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I’m a proud Quantum Gender Nanosecond Variable.

But would Laz hit it?

Great article Laz, BTW.


23 posted on 06/24/2014 8:46:19 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Do one of those refer to Male-Lesbian?

I'm one of those and I don't see it listed.

24 posted on 06/24/2014 8:48:17 AM PDT by red-dawg (<<< click for info on my book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

I’m just sad they don’t have mine listed.. I’m a Lezbeaman.

You see.. I am a woman trapped in a mans body.. I just happen to be a lesbian, so it’s all worked out. :)


25 posted on 06/24/2014 8:49:18 AM PDT by Dubya-M-Dees (Little HOPE... No CHANGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown
If you are on Facebook, go to your About, edit your Basic Facts, and offer Facebook this new option: Quantum Gender.

If enough people do this, Facebook will HAVE to mock themselves by adding this option.

26 posted on 06/24/2014 8:50:50 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
To my mind, there should be exactly three gender options:

Male

Female

Mentally Ill.

Agreed 100%. I read the underlying article and those "other" gender options are nothing but

 photo blended_horse_manure.jpg

PS: Welcome back!

27 posted on 06/24/2014 8:51:32 AM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (It is no more than a dream remembered, a Civilization gone with the wind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vendome
I don’t find men attractive in any way shape or form.

not even Tom Selleck?

28 posted on 06/24/2014 8:53:45 AM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya
I don’t find men attractive in any way shape or form.

not even Tom Selleck?

He is a handsome fellow with a nice mustache, but that doesn't mean other (normal, hetero) guys are attracted to him "that way."

29 posted on 06/24/2014 9:03:45 AM PDT by Disambiguator (#cornedbeef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; Lazamataz

What about “intersexting” or “sweet transvestite from Transsexual, Transylvania?”


30 posted on 06/24/2014 9:04:47 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Border Crisis = Cloward-Piven, Chicano-style!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Intersex is, indeed, mentioned.

Transvestism is not. SHAME ON FACEBOOK. LOL :)

31 posted on 06/24/2014 9:08:19 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Lazamataz
It's astounding. Time is fleeting. Madness takes its toll.
32 posted on 06/24/2014 9:09:20 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

He’s baaaaaaack..... :)


33 posted on 06/24/2014 9:09:34 AM PDT by LUV W (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL Vets, too!l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
He is a handsome fellow with a nice mustache, but that doesn't mean other (normal, hetero) guys are attracted to him "that way."

i was joking... even hetero men tend to like Tom Selleck... his mustache, the roles he plays... more like they would want to be him for a day... he is quite likable...

34 posted on 06/24/2014 9:14:12 AM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya; Disambiguator

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrsFR3UJ4HA
The look on his face.
I’ve gotten that look a few times.


35 posted on 06/24/2014 9:18:29 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
So if a Robosexual rides a mechanical bull...is that bestiality?
36 posted on 06/24/2014 9:19:10 AM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Quantam Gendered?

I dig it.

And when Eric von Zipper digs someone they stay dig’d....


37 posted on 06/24/2014 9:20:15 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Gender is life's dessert...with or with out nuts
38 posted on 06/24/2014 9:22:34 AM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
Robeastiality. <===theme music starring an image of a blue skinned dude that 80's kids would know.
39 posted on 06/24/2014 9:23:41 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; Mr. K; 50mm; humblegunner; Southack; mylife; penelopesire; onyx; BuckeyeTexan
Apparantly, there is a whole Quantum Gender thing going on out there:

A Unified Quantum Theory of the Sexual Interaction

Recent changes to the criteria for allocating research funding require particle physicists and astronomers to justify the wider social, cultural and economic impact of their science. In view of the directive to engage in work more directly relevant to the person in the street, I’ve decided to share with you my latest results, which involve the application of ideas from theoretical physics in the wider field of human activity. That is, if you’re one of those people who likes to have sex in a field.

In the simplest theories of the sexual interaction, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian describing all allowed forms of two-body coupling are identified with the conventional gender states, “Male” and “Female” denoted |M> and |F> in the Dirac bra-ket notation; note that the bra is superfluous in this context so, as usual, we dispense with it at the outset. Interactions between |M> and |F> states are assumed to be attractive while those between |M> and |M> or |F> and |F> are supposed either to be repulsive or, in some theories, entirely forbidden.

Observational evidence, however, strongly suggests that two-body interactions involving either F-F or M-M coupling, though suppressed in many situations, are by no means ruled out in the manner one would expect from the simplest theory outlined above. Furthermore, experiments indicate that the relevant channel for M-M interactions appears to have a comparable cross-section to that of the standard M-F variety, so a similar form of tunneling is presumably involved. This suggests that a more complete theory could be obtained by a relatively simple modification of the version presented above.

Inspired by the recent Nobel prize awarded for the theory of quark mixing, we are now able to present a new, unified theory of the sexual interaction. In our theory the “correct” eigenstates for sexual behaviour are not the conventional |M> and |F> gender states but linear combinations of the form

|M>=cosθ|S> + sinθ|G>

|F>=-sinθ|G>+cosθ|S>

where θ is the Cabibbo mixing angle or, more appropriately in this context, the sexual orientation (measured in degrees). Extension to three states is in principle possible (but a bit complicated) and we will not discuss this issue further.

In this theory each |M> or |F> state is regarded as a linear combination of heterosexual (straight, S) and homosexual (gay, G) states represented by a rotation of the basis by an angle θ, exactly the same mechanism that accounts for the charge-changing weak interactions between quarks.

For a purely heterosexual state, this angle is zero, in which case we recover the simple theory outlined above. At θ=90° only the G component manifests itself; in this state only classically forbidden interactions are permitted. The general state is however, one with a value of the orientation angle somewhere between these two limits and this permits all forms of interaction, at least with some probability.

Note added in proof: the |G> states do not appear in standard QFT but are motivated by some versions of string theory, expecially those involving G-strings.

One immediate consequence of this theory is that a “pure” gender state should be generally regarded as a quantum superposition of “straight” and “gay” states. This differs from a classical theory in that the true state can not be known with certainty; only the relative frequency of straight and gay behaviour (over a large number of interactions) can be predicted, perhaps explaining the large number of married men to be found on gaydar. The state at any given time is thus entirely determined by a sum over histories up to that moment, taking into account the appropriate action. In the Copenhagen interpretation, collapse one way or another occurs only when a measurement is made (or when enough Carlsberg is drunk).

If there is a difference in energy of the basis states a pure |M> state can oscillate between |S> and |G> according to a time-dependent phase factor arising when the two states interfere with each other:

|M(t)>=cosθ|S>exp(-iE1t) + sinθ|G>exp(-iE2t);

(obviously we are using natural units here, so that it all looks cleverer than it actually is). This equation is the origin of the expressions “it’s just a phase he’s going through” and “he swings both ways”. In physics parlance this means that the eigenstates of the sexual interaction do not coincide with the conventional gender types, indicating that sexual behaviour is not necessarily time-invariant for a given body.

Whether single-body phenomena (i.e. self-interactions) can provide insights into this theory depends, as can be seen from the equation, on the energies of the relevant states (as is also the case in neutrino oscillations). If they are equal then there is no oscillation. However, a detailed discussion of the role of degeneracy is beyond the scope of this analysis.

Self- interactions involving a solitary phase are generally difficult to observe, although examples have been documented that involve short-lived but highly-excited states accompanied by various forms of stimulated emission. Unfortunately, however, the resulting fluxes are not often well measured. This form of interaction also appears to be the current preoccupation of string theorists.

More definitive evidence for the theory might emerge from situations involving some form of entanglement, such as in the examples of M-M and F-F coupling mentioned above. Non-local interactions of a sexual type are possible in principle, but causality and simultaneity issues exist and most researchers consequently prefer to focus on local interactions, which are generally supposed to be more satisfactory from the point-of-view of reproducibility.

Although the theory is qualitatively successful we need more experimental data to pin down the parameters needed for a robust fit. It is not known, for example, whether the rates of M-M and F-F coupling are similar or, indeed, whether the peak intensity of these interactions, when resonance is reached, is similar to those of the standard M-F form. It is generally accepted, however, that the rate of decay from peak intensity is rather slower for processes involving |F> states than for|M> which is not so easy to model in this theory, although with a bit of renormalization we can probably explain anything.

Answers to these questions can perhaps be gleaned from observations of many-body processes (i.e. those with N≥3), especially if they involve a multiplicity of hardon states (i.e. collective excitations). Only these permit a full exploration of all possible degrees of freedom, although higher-order Feynman diagrams are needed to depict them and they require more complicated group theoretical techniques. Examples like the one shown – representing a threesome – are not well understood, but undoubtedly contribute significantly to the bi-spectrum.

One might also speculate that in these and other highly excited states, the sexual interaction may be described by something more like the electroweak theory in which all forms of interaction occur in a much more symmetric fashion and at much higher rates than at lower energies. That sounds like some kind of party…

It is worth remarking that there may be finer structure than this model takes into account. For example, the |G> state is generally associated with singlet configurations like those shown on the right. However, G-G coupling is traditionally described in terms of “top” |t> and “bottom” |b> states, with b-t coupling the preferred mode, leading to the possibility of doublets or even triplets. It may be even prove necessary to introduce a further mixing angle φ of the form

|G>=cosφ |t> + sinφ |b>

so that the general state of |G> is “versatile”. However, whether G-G interactions can be adequately described even in this extended theory is a matter for debate until the intensity of t-t and b-b coupling is more accurately measured.

Finally, we should like to point out the difference between our model and that of the usual quark sextet, in which interacting states are described in terms of three pairs: the bottom (b) and top (t) which we have mentioned already; the strange (s) and charmed (c); and the up (u) and down (d). While it is clear that |b> and |t> do exhibit strong interactions and it appears plausible that |s> and |c> might do likewise, the sexual interaction clearly breaks the isospin symmetry between the |u> and the |d> in both M-M and M-F cases. The “up” state is definitely preferred in all forms of coupling and, indeed, the “down” has only ever been known to engage in weak interactions.

We have recently submitted an application to the Science and Technology Facilities Council for a modest sum (£754 million) to build a large-scale UK facility in order to carry out hands-on experimental tests of some aspects of the theory. We hope we can rely on the support of the physics community in agreeing to close down their labs and quit their jobs in order to release the funding needed to support it.

40 posted on 06/24/2014 9:24:43 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

There is no such thing as gender outside of languages.

This gender drama is a construct. Not real.

There are two sexes and different ways people choose to express them.


41 posted on 06/24/2014 9:26:23 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Mongo read, Mongo not understand.
Mongo think fags bad.

Mongo only pawn in game of life.


42 posted on 06/24/2014 9:26:43 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Lazamataz

He’s back!


43 posted on 06/24/2014 9:27:03 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

We will have to invent new equations and math symbols for this.


44 posted on 06/24/2014 9:27:51 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I cannot begin to tell you the frustration I encountered when I told a trans that there were only two sexes and everything else is a construct and I don’t buy the constructs.


45 posted on 06/24/2014 9:28:00 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

Magnum!


46 posted on 06/24/2014 9:29:50 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I am now going to try that! Will you let us know when they add it to the stew? :)

PS...this is what I got as a popup when I actually tried to add it to the “custom” setting...

>>>>You must select one or more custom genders in order to save.<<<<

So...there ya are.


47 posted on 06/24/2014 9:32:40 AM PDT by LUV W (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL Vets, too!l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
There's a treatment for issues with the Cabibbo mixing angle.


48 posted on 06/24/2014 9:40:02 AM PDT by 50mm (Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

I could imagine myself as Frank Regan for a day...No, skip that.

I want a week. ..

I’d take my badass son and Father around Manhattan and clean the place up.

Probably start with those crap for brains cab drivers, then start giving hickory stick shampoos above 101st.

After we cleaned the place up I’d ply Bebe Neuwirth with my charm and a few drinks as we over looked Central Park from my suite at Trump International. Love that place and Jon George, one of the bestest restaurants is downstairs.

They could deliver our breakfast.....


49 posted on 06/24/2014 9:40:13 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
The look on his face. I’ve gotten that look a few times.

haha! i just love that guy!

50 posted on 06/24/2014 9:40:14 AM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson