Posted on 06/25/2014 12:39:53 PM PDT by 7thson
Wathinc BOR last night - please refrain the usual comments as to why and so on and so on. He spoke with Perino and Alan Colmes. Basic question - is Obama trying to bring the US down on purpose or is it just his policies. Answer from Perino - no, not on purpose, his belief system is just bad. BOR basically agreed.
Now back to my title question - wgat di we see that others do not? Why do we see it? Do those like Perino and BOR actually believe what they spout?
Personnaly - I think it is way past time for people to come around to the conclusion that Obama is purposely destroying this nation. Some time ago, Dennis Miller told BOR not to forget to turn the lights off when he leaves the room of giving Obama the benefit of the doubt. Dogged him for being the last believer of Obama's good intentions - but it seems that there are other RINOs out there who still believe in the mythical goodness of person Obama..
Why do they? Do they actually believe? What is in it for them? What will it take for these people to say this is a evil person bent on our personal destruction? Or are they so afraid of having to say they were wrong that they will continue to have blinders on while the country goes down in flames?
What say you Freepers?
BOR’s schtick is to be the “thoughtful” moderate. It means anything that is too, uh, radical is not a position he will take. I figured this out when he came down on the Swift Boat vets.
He doesn’t say what he believes. He says what he thinks will bolster his brand, which is the “thoughtful moderate”.
Even though there is no such thing.
Dr. Krauthammer Agrees With Us: Obama Greases the Skids of American Decline
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | June 24, 2014 | Rush Limbaugh
Posted on Tuesday, June 24, 2014 3:03:20 PM by Kaslin
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I just told the broadcast engineer I wasn't gonna do this sound bite now, but now I'm gonna do it.
Last night on the Fox News Channel, The O'Reilly Factor, the guest was Dr. Krauthammer. I only say it that way 'cause Henry Kissinger said it that way to me once. He kept talking to me one time about the great Krauthammer column that he liked and, you know, me I'm a student of voices, so it just stick with me. I don't say it to disparage anybody. Just to be flexible and different. Dr. Krauthammer.
Anyway, Dr. Krauthammer was on the Fox News Channel last night, and it was during the story that O'Reilly calls the Personal Story segment, talking with Krauthammer about the United States retreating from the world, and O'Reilly said to Krauthammer, "Many people, including me, think that -- Charles, just how bad is it out there?"
KRAUTHAMMER: There's a big difference between decline as a condition and decline as a choice. What we have with Obama is a president choosing decline.
more...
Repeating last paragraph for emphasis.
KRAUTHAMMER: There's a big difference between decline as a condition and decline as a choice. What we have with Obama is a president choosing decline.
Back to the question. Is Obama trying to bring down the Country on purpose?
Answer:
Are you posting this from a moving vehicle on a wrist-watch Ipad?
Just wondering...
Excellent! There's my reason #5.
Perino is just too polite to say $hit if she had a mouthful.She does provide the common sense balance on the Five but sometimes she goes too far in justifying maladministration as only making ‘bad choices’. This is such a time.
“Obama is a Chicago Marxist using Alinsky tactics to forward his agenda. And he is doing it by implementing Cloward-Piven.
The explosions ithe Middle East is his Islamic roots.
“”
Okay, what does that have to do with the thread? How does that explain the myopia of the GOP elites?
OK, so when they were in the elevator, was “Girl from Ipanima” playing?
Or was that The Blues Brothers...
Even I, as someone who has a great deal of antipathy toward the Current Occupant, have a hard time believing that he’s genuinely evil or that he purposefully wants to bring the country down. This isn’t to say that I haven’t often thought it or that I couldn’t be persuaded fully, but it’s a very serious charge to level and I don’t like leveling very serious charges lightly.
I think it has something to do with an ingrained respect for the office, a (perhaps naive) belief that no one person or administration can truly bring down a country (especially one that supposedly has the checks and balances ours does) and a feeling that if things were really as bad or about to get as bad as some believe, the people wouldn’t let it happen in the end.
And this is my viewpoint as an average guy. If I have trouble wrapping my head around it, imagine the difficulty of those who have a lot more to lose and who aren’t as affected by his policies as I am (or as we are).
Your spelling and phrase construction are poor.
I’m not so fussy about this on replies, since they are lower profile. But for full posts you really would think the standards would be a little higher.
In some places I can’t really tell what you are saying.
Why not?
******************
何が？
What do you expect from someone who claims their identity is “private”? That’s a big clue right there.
LOL
I make good money. And I'm very aware of what's going on...in D.C. And I don't get PAID to pay attention.
What's your explanation, then?
I still say the likes of BOR are insulated from the pain. They don't want to see what's going on because it means they would have to deal with it.
“Big Trouble in Little China” one of my favorite Kurt Russel movies.
BOR is a lazy ass....thinking he's something to America.
He's a joke.....and FOX should fire him.
Bwhahaha! LwgatOL!!!
The simple fact is that he-alone is irrelevant. Why?
Because without the Congress especially, and Supreme Court in general, allowing him to act freely he could not do anything. This is to say that the inaction of the other two branches is an action just as much as the decision to refrain from helping someone is a decision nonetheless.
Plus, you should always remember that Congress holds the purse-strings, if they wanted they could defund any portion of the federal government — I find it amazing/astounding/incredible that during the semi-initial revelations of the NSA domestic-espionage programs the possibility of defunding even came up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.