Skip to comments.Question: Can JILL McDaniel run for Senate in Mississippi as a write-in?
Posted on 06/26/2014 11:25:38 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Jill, a former Miss USA Mississippi pageant winner, is the wife of Chris McDaniel, whose selection by CONSERVATIVES was thwarted by the race baiting team of Thad Cochran.
I went to ballotpedia.org:
to find out if there was any reason Jill could not be a write in candidate.
Some of pointed out, I believe, that Mississippi, has a "sore loser" law that prevents CHRIS from running as a write-in.
Recalling her situation made me think of this.
If Chris can't run, can his wife?
Good question —
I guess people want to split the vote and elect a Dem? The country is at stake, and for all his warts, Cochran will vote with the GOP to organize the Senate. REID must go!
A sore loser law?
Biting my tongue..
Yes, she can. And everything should be done to keep cockroach out of the Senate. These people are snakes and need to be eliminated with ALL available means!
If not, vote for the dem. It's like a double vote against Cocharan. And it shows loud and clear conservative disgust for the racist tactics Cocharan's team engaged in.
Karl Rove thanks you for voting for the lesser of two evils
Well I assume ANYBODY could run as a write in, it’s not as if they could break down your door and arrest you if you were telling people to write your name on the ballot. The question is could McDaniel be elected if he “won” or would the votes just be thrown out?
well when your vote is DEM -vs- DEM whaqt difference does it make?
Cochran will never vote to remove obamacare or impeach
>> Yes, she can <<
Wrong. The filing deadlines for independents has passed, and Mississippi will count write-in votes only if an “on ballot” candidate has died or withdrawn.
As I said, for whom Cochran will vote for when the senate is organized in Jan 2015... Big Difference
Yeah, my bad.
She has two young boys. They are more important than we are.
If it happens, so be it.
Although Cochran might not support all Republican bills, he does count as 1 Republican Senator, thus if it came down to it, he would make Harry Reid the Senate Minority Leader. Even if McConnell and a few other RINOs are less than conservative enough for our liking, a Republican majority in both Houses does have it’s benefits (we know the consequences of loosing that.)
The RINOs will know that the TEA party is “breathing down their necks” and will know that any obstruction of conservative bills will be fatal to their re-election hopes (through Primary challenges or in the General, if necessary.)
At every opportunity, it must be impressed upon the RINOs/eGOP loudly and publicly, that anymore active opposition to conservatives in the Primary (or General) will be visited upon them 10 fold. In reality they should understand that the wave of voter retribution may already be unstoppable regardless of their future activities.
Can you source that? I couldn't find any info from ballotpedia, which seemed to be a fairly objective source.
I’m generally in agreement with you.
But not in this case. What was done to MS Conservatives by their own party was unconcionable and cannot be allowed to stand.
Effectively, MS Conservatives were disenfranchised by the crossover Dem vote. While I tend to believe that the Dems were largely responsible in an attempt to split the GOP and give the Dems a Senate pick up, the GOP leadership were the ones who got the ball running and opened the door to it.
The MS law in question has been cited ad nauseum today on at least half-a-dozen other FR threads, specifically the threads dealing with the Mississippi run-off Tuesday. One of the threads even repeats the MS Code verbatim. But sorry that I didn't bookmark that material.
Mississippi Code: 23-15-365
According to state law, write-in candidates are permitted only as the legitimate substitute
of a candidate who has died, resigned, withdrawn or been removed from the race.
That applies to every race, whether its a primary, special or general election at
any level of government, said Pamela Weaver, communications director of the secretary of
But every election ballot includes a space for write-in candidates, whether or not one
is needed for that race. Its there just in case a write-in does become eligible.
And thats perhaps where the confusion occurs, since some people see the space and assume
write-ins are allowed in all elections.
Reply | Private Reply
The cite I saw was to the March 1st deadline, not write-in qualification. The post seemed to indicate that it referred to both. Other than that, there are references to a 3-1/2-year-old article in a Tupelo paper that quoted an SOS employee.
Any word if a recount is in the works? Do I understand correctly that if one voted in the Dem primary, one was ineligible to vote in the Rep runoff? Wonder how many votes that would impact, if true.
Organized into what? Another Gang of 14?
Id rather get rid of McConnell and Cochran
and let the chips fall where they may.
BTW, what exactly has McConnell done to fight the Rats and Obama?
If I were in Mississippi, I would have a very very very hard time voting for Cochran. 90% sure I would NOT do it.
The same thing happened with us and Charlie Crist. The day I learned he was going to be on stage with Obama early in 2009 after the Clown seized power, I called his office and told whoever was taking messages—PLEASE do not do this, it is wrong...the lady said she was hearing the same thing, and she too sounded unhappy about Crist’s intentions.
I said then I would NOT vote for him.
He made it much easier then by going Independent and then Democrat.
Cochran is the same way.
(1) There shall be left on each ballot one (1) blank space under the title of each office to be voted for, and in the event of the death, resignation, withdrawal or removal of any candidate whose name shall have been printed on the official ballot, the name of the candidate duly substituted in the place of such candidate may be written in such blank space by the voter.
That provision doesn't exclude writing-in any other eligible person's name. It merely provides an example of a permitted name, IMO.
And, then, should Cochran be rewarded with another 6 years for what he just did?
No, voting for the dem does not send any kind of a message to the GOPe. It tells them the GOP should be more like the democrats. The answer is to vote for a conservative third party candidate. This tells the GOPe loud and clear just exactly how strong the conservative movement is within the GOP. This might still elect the democrat candidate but it does not give much of a mandate. Please, do not ever vote for a democrat in a national election, there is always an alternative.
We don’t know what he’d vote for since he’s senile.
Wrong, if Cochran is elected, the GOPe knows it can get away with any kind of despicable sleazy lies and election fraud. They know they can do as they please, kick the conservatives to the curb, and they will just come back for more. We need to stop voting for these people, EVER!
Thad Cochran delenda est
Ha. I’d love to see McDaniel concede and endorse the Democrat as being the only pro-life, pro-gun candidate for MS. THAT would put Haley and Cockroach in a bind.
Yeah, here we go. Give the seat to the democrat.
Chris lost. He didn’t lose fair and square, we know that, but he lost. Let’s hold our noses and keep the republican in office.
I’m not from MS so it’s not fight, but dammit our goal is to take the Senate. Chris will have his day, but for now let’s draw together and keep it a republican seat.
Wouldn't be the first time that Harry Reid bribed an elected Republican to change parties so he could maintain control of the Senate.
Tell that to Eric Cantor and his fellow RINOs.
They are not team payers as you would have McDaniels be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.