I understand all that.
I was specifically referring to the comment in #13.
#13 hopefully was a sarcastic post, but as it wasn’t mine, so just my guess.
I have noticed that many of these warrantless “intrusions” resulting in family pet being shot, are in some obtuse connection to a “child” situation, which is not unlike the old dem Bill passage ploy “its for the chillrin”, used to get by with illegal and unsavory things..