Skip to comments.
Do Republicans Still Have a Chance in Colorado?
National Journal ^
| June 29, 2014
| Josh Kraushaar
Posted on 06/30/2014 11:16:26 AM PDT by right-wing agnostic
DENVERMario Nicolais is the kind of candidate who could help the Republican Party win back the suburban voters it has lost.
He's fiscally conservative but socially moderate, a member of the NRA but also a founder of a Republican group that champions gay rights. And on this afternoon at a local bar, he's clearly at ease chatting up the fans who've turned out to watch Mexico play Brazil in the World Cup. Hispanics make up 23 percent of his state Senate district, and Nicolais knows that Republicans will need to peel off some of them to have any hope of winning in November.
But he won't be on the ballot then.
Nicolais lost in the Republican primary to businessman Tony Sanchez, a tea-party-aligned opponent who was recruited into the race by conservatives looking to block Nicolais's path to the nomination. And he wasn't the only establishment-backed Jefferson County Republican to lose against a more conservative rival. In a neighboring district, military veteran Lang Sias, once a recruit for Congress, lost to a first-time candidate who had the backing of the conservative grassroots.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...
TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: 2014midterms; co2014; colorado; gopprospects
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
I think that 2014 will be a good year for the Colorado GOP, but I said that in 2010 and they blew it. (Thanks Dan Maes!) I think the Democrats infuriated many independents and pro-gun Democratic voters by pushing their STUPID and UNCONSTITUTIONAL gun-control legislation in 2013. I hope that Bob Beauprez and Cory Gardner can ride the Republican tidal way to victory. If not, WE ARE COMPLETELY SCREWED here in Colorado./rwa
To: right-wing agnostic
They should run on a platform of banning pot.
2
posted on
06/30/2014 11:17:21 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: right-wing agnostic
> fiscally conservative but socially moderate
In other words, another bloody RINO.
No thanks.
3
posted on
06/30/2014 11:19:18 AM PDT
by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
To: GeronL
Run on a platform to reverse a vote of the people. Yeah, that’s a real winner.
4
posted on
06/30/2014 11:19:42 AM PDT
by
Hugin
To: right-wing agnostic
Chickenpooper blew it. I think the sheriffs are more popular than the demoRATS. Two recalled and one forced into resigning rats in the state are just a start. The demorats can not win on the truth.
5
posted on
06/30/2014 11:21:13 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: right-wing agnostic
DENVERMario Nicolais is the kind of candidate who could help the Republican Party win back the suburban voters it has lost.
____________________________________________________
And he is exactly the kind of candidate we conservatives DON’T want. I would rather see a big spending democRat win than this Fruit Loop.
6
posted on
06/30/2014 11:21:35 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: right-wing agnostic
He's fiscally conservative but socially moderate, a member of the NRA but also a founder of a Republican group that champions gay rights.
Might as well be a Democrat if he is liberal on social issues, because being liberal o socialist items means he will vote with democrats to increase social spending.
As for being supportive of the NRA, there are pro NRA Democrats in Congress now, but but it sure never made a difference when anti-gun legislation was passed by the Democrats.
So who cares if he wins or the Democrat wins. Same person, different label is all.
7
posted on
06/30/2014 11:26:50 AM PDT
by
OneVike
(I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
To: right-wing agnostic
Hispanics make up 23 percent of his state Senate district, and Nicolais knows that Republicans .....Nicolais lost in the Republican primary to businessman Tony Sanchez, a tea-party-aligned opponent.
Gee, bet none of those Hispanics would vote for a guy named 'Sanchez'; NOT!
8
posted on
06/30/2014 11:27:55 AM PDT
by
Hostage
(ARTICLE V)
To: OneVike
As for being supportive of the NRA, there are pro NRA Democrats in Congress now, but but it sure never made a difference when anti-gun legislation was passed by the Democrats. Actually it has made a difference. Obviously not when any gun control bills were passed, the last being 1993. But those Democrats were the reason no gun control bills made it to the floor in 2009-10 when the RATs had both houses and the White House.
9
posted on
06/30/2014 11:46:53 AM PDT
by
Hugin
To: right-wing agnostic
Social leftists cannot be fiscal Conservatives, period. This dude is a Democrat.
To: right-wing agnostic
I think Cory is a great candidate. It looks like Udall thinks pro-abortion ads can re-elect him, which has never worked before.
Hick is imploding, so I have high hopes for Beauprez as well.
To: right-wing agnostic
Colo went blue scary fast.
From +5 Bush in 2004 to +5 Baraq in 2012.
12
posted on
06/30/2014 11:59:03 AM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
To: right-wing agnostic
As much chance as NH....slim.
To: right-wing agnostic
Colorado became a lost cause after it was flooded with illegal aliens from Mexico and California.
14
posted on
06/30/2014 12:05:20 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Not to mention California transplants like my idiot niece who could afford Cali when her “domestic partner” dumped her and moved to Denver.
15
posted on
06/30/2014 12:08:57 PM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
To: right-wing agnostic
Hispanics make up 23 percent of his state Senate district ... How many of them are here legally?
16
posted on
06/30/2014 12:17:53 PM PDT
by
kitchen
(Even the walls have ears.)
To: nascarnation
Colo went blue scary fast.
From +5 Bush in 2004 to +5 Baraq in 2012. This means nothing; the GOP pushed ObamaClone Romney!
Seriously, how is offering just the same
going to induce someone who is dissatisfied with it to go for it?
(And despite what people think a Romney presidency could actually have been worse than a second Obama term — remember that reaching across the aisle
only means compromising and that the opposition party
has shown no intent to oppose Obama it would be ridiculous to think that [1] Romney would pull for correcting poor policy or [2] that the GOP would hold his feet to the fire
or [3] issuing ObamaCare waivers to all the states would not down-the-line result in extortion of the states.)
17
posted on
06/30/2014 12:26:30 PM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: nascarnation
You mean “RED.” Don’t use the Orwellian newspeak colors. Commie is bright red, not blue.
To: OneWingedShark
Yes Romney was a lousy candidate.
But find me another state that swung left 10 points in a 2004 to 2012 comparison. That’s a dramatic and nearly unprecedented change.
19
posted on
06/30/2014 1:09:44 PM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
To: right-wing agnostic
He's fiscally conservative but socially moderate, a member of the NRA but also a founder of a Republican group that champions gay rights. Fresh perspectives are always useful.
20
posted on
07/01/2014 11:55:07 AM PDT
by
koanhead
(If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism -Ronald Reagan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson