Skip to comments.Two Dads Holding Their Newborn Son Will Make You Tear Up (and vomit)
Posted on 07/04/2014 12:12:56 PM PDT by Citizen Zed
There's never been a better reason to share one of the most intimate moments of anyone's life.
Toronto couple BJ Barone and Frankie Nelson welcomed newborn son Milo into the world on June 27, just as WorldPride was being celebrated in the city amid an outpouring of love for families of all kinds.
(Excerpt) Read more at m.huffpost.com ...
which one carried the child to term??
Which one of the men gave birth to the baby? What’s that you say? NEITHER of them? Oh. Then I’m wondering how the boy can be THEIR son?
Well, boys will be boys. *Rolleyes*
You realize it was the homo community that created the “Sex by 8 or its too late” meme
Ever notice that the gays always adopt or have a son? Ever wonder why that is? I guess you don’t have to. They are sure to indoctrinate the little fella into the gay lifestyle. SHouldn’t this be a crime, and not something to be celebrated? I weep for these kids.
To paraphrase the Fox mascot on the TV commercial: “Show me the vajayjay!”
Which ‘parent’ breastfeeds the little bugger?
“for families of all kinds.” No, a family is defined as a man married to a woman and then they have children. Don’t let the left redefine the language, the premise, and then set the debate terms. Not in my book. This is how they label you with expletives when you refuse to accept their terms. The left refuses to accept our terms, the historically held ones and defined in the Bible.
Be careful. It might be “hate speech” to ask which man gave birth to their new baby.
It makes me puke to think of the abuse these two wicked men will put an innocent child through.
Oh, h-—. Both of them shirtless and wrapped around each other and one grimacing like he had just given birth?
Oh, no, no, no, no, no.
That poor child has at best been given to a pair of hysterics to be fathers and the models of manhood for him.
I can’t forget a teenage boy I met, holding up after his homosexual adopted father’s dozenth suicide attempt/gesture. I’ve never heard a child refer explicitly to his “adoptive father” like that before or since.
Beyond regular levels of disgusting. Pray this boy runs away at the first opportunity from his psycho ‘dads’
And when these inherently unstable relationships dissolve, who gets Milo? The children’s shelter?
And when these two decide to have a third man in for a tryst will Milo be even more confused. Imagine a 6 yr. old Milo trying to keep track of the players in his life.
Next time boys get a shelter dog. On the other hand, that’s not a good idea either. Gack!
That kid will have to be brainwashed 24/7. He is going to end up seeing himself as a soulless creature one day.
No mother to nurture him. And two perv homos in the next bedroom....I just cant even begin to express how much I hope that this kid also just runs. To prevent his mind being warped and to stave off the likelihood of being molested.
Like these two dudes are going to have some morals or moral authority regarding anything.
Two faggie drama queans & a helpless infant are NOT an example of “families of all kinds”.
“For behold, God is not mocked.”
The likelihood of molestation is huge. This is why Russia stopped its kids being adopted by Americans.
BJ? Somehow, appropriate.
Yeah, like that kid’s not going to have a twisted, screwed up life.
Everyday a shiite storm.
I wonder if the baby had a public defender before being sentenced to a life of queerdom?
Gotta give it to Russia on that one. Smart move.
In fact, India, China and Africa should also put a ban on this as well.
If they want kids so badly, try making one with each other.
Spoiler alert for gays: Nature apparently is “homophobic”, so dont waste your time because you wont pull it off.
Oh, that’s nothing. I worked for a place where we bought out a failed competitor. One of the designers was a lezbo, whose girlfriend was inseminated with sperm from a gay guy who also worked at the company. See, Sally (or “Bull Dyke” or whatever they name the kid) will have two moms and two dads just like anybody else! No harm no foul!
Even if one of them is the sperm donor/vendor.
She is complicit in denying her child the right to his own mother and his natural kin: the first right a child has after the right to life itself.
And on a more heart-felt level: isn't the anxiety going to torment her for the rest of her life? What th' hell does she think she's doing?
When the two guys break up, is she going to reappear to reclaim the child?
I suppose they'll go on to adopt a second child, so they can each have one.
Kinda funny how they used to call heterosexuals (in a disparaging way) “breeders”. Guess that’s right out now?
The biological mother might simply have sold her eggs to a broker, while the gestational carrier was contracted separately.
“Toronto couple BJ Barone and Frankie Nelson welcomed newborn son Milo into the world”
Can two men, by nature, go off in the woods and naturally create a child, or two women?
The the natural formation of a human parent is not a mere “desire to be a parent” but the only natural way a child is born, which is neither by two men, or by two women.
Where from then does any two men or any two women, acting together, obtain a NATURAL right to LEGAL parenthood, beyond the natural means with natural partners of the opposite sex? Nowhere, in my opinion. The law may permit such things, as it chooses, but to declare such a thing a right is unnatural to human nature.
I thought passing a kidney stone was bad, but a baby?
Why are the 2 pervs naked? Were they having homo sex during the birth? Porn on display...how sick
This will be the next big "civil rights' movement. They can even use the same slogans - "its not who you love, its how", after all.
I’m surprised the breast feeding nazis haven’t protested this sort of thing.
There’s alot of spirits activists who think bottle feeding is abusive & should be outlawed.
“Which one of the men gave birth to the baby?”
I was going to ask which one pooped him out, but I suppose that would be gauche of me.
Poor kid. Doomed, in my opinion.
An effeminate dude does not replace a mother in child reering.
Very likely. When people form the intention to break natural relations, they break them hard.
Well, it’s unfettered capitalism, and we’re not supposed to criticize that.
Our younger son is adopted, as you know. This was because he had no mama or papa who wanted him, no family member who wanted him, and we tried, as best we could, to fill his need for a mama and a papa. It was responding to a known hurt, a known wound, a known deprivation that he had suffered.
But this artificial insemination - IVF - surrogate thing is deliberately wounding the child. Deliberately creating him to be bereft of his natural mother and a natural family. Two gay guys plunk down the money and walk off with a newborn baby.
Buy and sell! Buy and sell! Anything, everyone, people, places, things! Godless capitalism, like godless communism, both destined for destruction on the Day of the Lord.
I’ll cry alright....I’ll cry for my country and the poor kid “raised” by these two idiots.
“Ever notice that the gays always adopt or have a son?”
All the time.
Which parent breastfeeds the little bugger?
...the one with biggest man boobs
They call us breeders not just because we procreate but because they think we are procreating for THEM, to keep a constant supply of potential recruits coming.
Despite biological reality - scientifically verifiable, objective facts of human existence - homosexuals generally insist that their behavior is natural, innate.. their identity from conception. The argument is one of “nature”.
Yet they go ahead and adopt children, to raise them in their “ways” and do Lord knows what kinds of abominations to them. Looks to me like they act according to the “nurture” argument while lying and insisting that they are born that way.
Sure a lot of recruitment and bullying going on for what is supposed to be a genetic roll of the dice.
Kid doesn’t stand a chance....
I agree with you. I’ve noticed recently that posters list a variety of percentages, insisting that homosexuals are and can be no more than X% of the population. This is buying into the “genetic roll of the dice” contention.
If homosexual behavior is influenced by environment in any way, then there is no fixed upper limit to the percentage who will engage in it.