Skip to comments.Will Australia get carbon trading? The Palmer and Al Gore paradox goes onů
Posted on 07/07/2014 6:06:25 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Palmer is offering to vote for Tony Abbotts Direct Action Plan as long as he gets his Emissions Trading Scheme as well (the one he didnt want eight weeks ago, to solve a problem he didnt believe existed).
None of it makes sense on its face. Clive Palmer, the coal miner and die-hard unbeliever, appears to want an ETS, the Climate Change Authority, the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and direct action to reduce CO2 as well as the RET. (And some say that Gore lost?)
Is Palmer just playing games with both the Coalition and the media, holding cards for negotiation-sake, and messing with journalists heads? It could be. But until we see the fine print on the legislation (and all the other deals), we can assume the loser of the Gore-Palmer paradox was neither Gore nor Palmer, but the Australian taxpayer.
Abbott will find it hard to knock back a deal to bring in Direct Action, after having campaigned for so long to get it working. Especially if the ETS is sold as a dead duck at zero dollars and only on the condition that Japan, South Korea, China, Australian and the US all start emissions trading. How could he turn that down?
It could be a painful squeeze: he said he wants Direct Action, but he won his position as leader of the Coalition by opposing an ETS in 2009, and Coalition voters hate the carbon imposts in every guise. An ETS is just a carbon tax in a form where the bankers scoop up the cream, instead of it being redistributed to special interests and marginal seats. The brokerage fees on a 2 Trillion dollar market greases a lot of wheels. The Money-Go-Round that market powers, sets up an Industry of industries clamouring for green gravy.
For Gore, being able to claim that Australia had legislated an ETS (however meaningless) is a momentum win in the public relations campaign. It would also be a sweet lever to use on Canada and Japan and everywhere elsewhere. Gore would love to turn up to the UNFCCC in Paris in 2015 with conditional agreements from a range of countries. Could he get away with it? If the Australian ETS was a joke (down to the fine print) and known to be a joke, it would not be worth a thing. But given how patsy the media are, dutiful journalists will report that even Australias conservative government has signed up to an ETS as if it means something. Do we want to rely on investigative impartial reporting? Exactly.
Clive is playing hard ball every which way, and seemingly getting away with it. But his facade of ploys would turn around and bite him if the media would only do their job and portray him as the fake man he is who transparently believes in nothing but games. His voters didnt vote for him to keep the RET, the Climate Change Authority, or an Emissions Trading Scheme. But the Love Media are enjoying watching him play Abbott, and have no problem with the insincerity as he panders to their green religion.
When will someone pin Clive down and ask him to explain his climate beliefs? Wed need a real media
He seems some what unstable and seems to love the limelight too much for someone in his position. It concerns me that the balance of power may be in the hands of this nut job! Labor have been reticent to criticize him too much as I think they are unsure about him - Libs need his votes so they are bit scared to call him insane. One of his party members from Tasmania is one scary nut job herself. They seem to be all over the place like a mad mans feces.
from what I’ve read, its just the media being misleading, not palmer.
Thanks for the reply !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.