Another poorly conceived and written article with no mention of the nature of the evidence.
Kind of impossible for thinking people to discern whether this is a Nifong style lynch mob or a legitimate expose on a sexual predator and it is appropriate to wait for the evidence.
With a little Internet search, this appears to stem from peer to peer file sharing. I would assert that he is probably guilty, but that it is possible that there was child porn (actually, there is of this date no confirmation that anyone in the photos was underage, it is merely being investigated) in a large torrent batch file.
A lot of “if”s.
Hopefully we will get a more complete story as this works it’s way through the courts.
True. And it’s not (yet) child molestation (electric chair?), but porn.
If so, he should be canned for sure, from both places.
Look at the recent long comment by someone that worked under him at BS!
But otherwise, I’m going to play that stupid “looks” game always on the woman threads and say....GUILTY!
>Another poorly conceived and written article with no mention of the nature of the evidence.
It is hard to report on something you are never going to be allowed to see for yourself.