Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Says Incest Okay Because Abortion Can Kill “Deformed” Babies Incest Produces
life news ^ | Carole Novielli

Posted on 07/11/2014 6:27:22 PM PDT by Morgana

An Australian Judge has implied that incest is okay ad to make matters worse he suggested legalized abortion can get rid of children that may be born deformed from the relationship.

According to The Independent, District Court Judge Garry Neilson has been criticized for espousing the view that sexual contact between siblings or between adults and children should perhaps no longer be viewed as “unnatural” or “taboo”, the Sydney Morning Herald reported.

australiajudgeNeilson drew parallels with widely changing attitudes towards gay sex. In the same way, he said, “a jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner”.

The judge went on to say that incest is only criminalized because of the high chance that any resulting offspring will be born with serious birth defects, but added that “even that [risk] falls away to an extent [because] there is such ease of contraception and readily access to abortion”.

Neilson made the astonishing comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man had earlier pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when he was 17 and she was 10 or 11 in 1973 or 1974 – but pleaded not guilty to the charge of sexual intercourse without consent, with an alternative charge of incest, for the alleged 1981 offense.

Prosecutor Sally Dowling is now trying to get the case moved to another judge.

“These remarks in my submission are completely disgraceful,” Dowling stated. “The reference to abortion is particularly repellent.”


TOPICS: Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 3rdthread; abortion; activistcourts; garryneilson; homosexualagenda; incest; judicialactivism; proincest; prolife; prorape

1 posted on 07/11/2014 6:27:22 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

How did that lunatic ever become a judge?


2 posted on 07/11/2014 6:28:38 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

What a perverse and outrageous view on what life is.


3 posted on 07/11/2014 6:30:12 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

I don’t know how judges are put in place in Australia, but this one needs to go.


4 posted on 07/11/2014 6:31:09 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Judge Ed. D. Puss Says Incest Okay Because Abortion Can Kill “Deformed” Babies Incest Produces


5 posted on 07/11/2014 6:31:44 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits n firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

We’re sliding down the slippery slope.

Incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and polygamy will become the new deviancies du jour.


6 posted on 07/11/2014 6:32:33 PM PDT by Cato in PA (Resist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Pure evil.


7 posted on 07/11/2014 6:41:01 PM PDT by madmominct
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Is Obama appointing Australian judges too?


8 posted on 07/11/2014 6:41:27 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

When I see a FR post about about about abortion I’ll post this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4rJwgAQkSM&feature=youtu.be


9 posted on 07/11/2014 6:45:03 PM PDT by preacher (I am not a global warming hoax denier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

I wonder what one might find on the the judge’s computer...


10 posted on 07/11/2014 6:53:19 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Apparently if you’re willing to advocate doing an even number of wrongs to make things “right”, that’s OK…


11 posted on 07/11/2014 7:02:44 PM PDT by mikrofon (Weekend BUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The judges Idiot argument makes less sense than this...

12 posted on 07/11/2014 7:06:12 PM PDT by GraceG (No, My Initials are not A.B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Raise your hand if you think the judge has some experience in this dept.


13 posted on 07/11/2014 7:07:39 PM PDT by punknpuss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

What a fool. Incest is proscribed because it is destructive of the family as we know it.


14 posted on 07/11/2014 7:12:01 PM PDT by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

australiajudgeNeilson drew parallels with widely changing attitudes towards gay sex. In the same way, he said, “a jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner”.

He’s right about one thing. There are big similarities.


15 posted on 07/11/2014 7:23:39 PM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melsec

Same BS, different day.


16 posted on 07/11/2014 7:25:43 PM PDT by Mark17 (Obama & Nero? Both Emperors, except Nero was a better fiddler, and didn't need a pen or a phone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

That SOB judge should be staked out and provide food for the wild dingos! He sounds like some of the idiots in the England parliament.


17 posted on 07/12/2014 3:33:10 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The sex positive agenda seeks to end ALL moral judgments over sexual pairings of ANY kind regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).

The homosexual agenda is merely the battering ram to open the door for the whole pornicopia.


18 posted on 07/12/2014 7:05:07 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Let me suggest that someone check his daughters/nieces, other female relatives for sexual abuse. This weird, dangerous belief starts at home.


19 posted on 07/12/2014 9:02:49 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (If chocolate fudge cake could sing, it would sound like Barry White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: punknpuss

o/


20 posted on 07/12/2014 9:03:41 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (If chocolate fudge cake could sing, it would sound like Barry White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Don’t tell me. This is Maobama’s next pick for the Supreme Court.


21 posted on 07/12/2014 2:45:12 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
“a jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner”.

I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

22 posted on 07/12/2014 2:49:19 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is PUBLIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and polygamy will become the new deviancies du jour.

...what in the world is ‘new’ about any of these deviancies...including homosexuality...?


23 posted on 07/13/2014 6:39:38 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

Only “new” in the sense as the West is turning post-Christian, the historical societal restraints on these behaviors is sadly disappearing in the name of “progress” but I think a better term for it would be “regress.”


24 posted on 07/13/2014 7:17:10 AM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson