Skip to comments.Review: 'Snowpiercer'
Posted on 07/13/2014 11:31:20 PM PDT by Citizen Zed
The movie takes place in a new ice age brought on by global environmental abuse. Only a few hundred souls remain, and survival is very much at stake. Still, humans bring along the same old emotional baggage. Social class, economic disparity, power, loyalty and petty jealousies play out with a fury that comes from being imprisoned by circumstance. This is year 17 on the train. A generation has never lived anywhere else.
Lest that sound too dismal, buried inside the action is a story of hope hard won. It rests with one rebel, Curtis (Evans), a resident of the slums that have sprung up in the freight cars at the back of the train. The driving force is fairly simple: Curtis sets out for the engine with the idea of overtaking the Snowpiercer's power-source, both human and mechanical. Evans, channeling a dark mood and an unstoppable determination, becomes the film's all-important glue.
(Excerpt) Read more at articles.chicagotribune.com ...
Another product of ‘Administration outreach” to Hollywood to include ‘climate change themes’.
Incrementalism and repetition folks. No matter haw stupid the package.
Soooooul Train meets Sharknado? Cool!
this trope has been done before. Saw something similar on the Starz channel and the Syfy channel
Bradley Cooper in “Hangover On The Midnight Meat Train”?
Not that one. The title was shorter and on the Starz channel cannibalism was part of the plot
Saw it. Rich guys are scum. Poor guys are saints. Typical liberal crap. Apart from that not a bad movie. Not a good movie, either. I’d give it three out of five stars. IMHO, there is no way it deserves a 92% rating, which it was getting on Rotten Tomatoes when I looked last night.
That’s exactly what we said last night when we saw it. There’s something fishy with rotten tomato and the other ratings for it. Someone got paid. It wasn’t an awful movie. I’d give it 3 stars in 5, but it sure wasn’t anywhere near 92%. We called BS.
Good timing for Global Cooling themes. It’s getting colder next week...
Then Hollyweird wonders why nobody goes to the movies any more
($12 tickets, popcorn which costs more than caviar and other
things dont help).......
Well, they’ve done ocean arks and space arks. They’ve done land-locked city bound ‘arks’. They’ve done underground and above ground. They’ve done just about every wilda$$ scenario of dystopian future and an island-of-refuge one can think about.
So, now we get a train, traveling throughout the desolate land with the cargo cars (peons) and the higher class cars the closer one gets to the bridge, I mean engine. Just damn.
I wonder what the movie team had to do for the writer to put his prose into action without badmouthing it. I just wonder. An aside - I hear they’re making a Sharknado 2 ! Should be lotsa fun there!
The high Tomatometer rating is predictable
The Occupy Wall Street in Space, 99% vs The 1% theme probably helps with the critics.
The fanboys who love the book will rate this thing at Five Stars just to promote the franchise.
Nobody else knows this movie exists.
I dunno. The trailer looked pretty good to me:
I’m old enough now to have seen remakes of remakes of the movies that I watched as a kid.
It seems writers are just too damned lazy or too damned coddled in their lives to have any imagination that isn’t borne from a doobie. If any of you out there are wondering why I say this, I submit to you the TV Series “LOST”. The only possible explanation for it is that the writers were stoned. And, in the end, they backed themselves into a corner and had to pull something akin to the “Dallas” Bobby shower scene.
Mac & Me...nice.
The government changed the weather to match the release of the movie.
Waterworld. The Time Machine. Metropolis. Wikipedia has a page full of them: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dystopian_films
is it as good as Sharknado?
Because I only have so many brain cells left to waste
The only redeeming feature of this film is that the snow apocalypse was caused by scientists trying to undo global warming.
I like post apocalyptic stories and this looks like an interesting departure from the typical theme.
let me guess, the heroes are sexy black guys who teach everybody how to survive and build computers while fighting the effeminate White men
I did not see the Sharknado, but I’m guessing Snowpiercer is better.
Agree, the classism “keep your place” was gratuitous.
If they’d had just the first Tilda Swinton speech and skipped the other “keep your place” lectures and the kid saying “all back passengers are scum” in the classroom out, it would have been better.
The kronole and its role was actually interesting, as was “how do you live in an enclosed system” like that.
It is $7 on Amazon instant video right now.
I thought that was interesting, too. Without any regional testing, the world just deploys massive geo-engineering methods “for the planet” and nearly kill it.
You're right on this in general - however - I read an article about this movie that the "Climate Issues" in this movie stemmed from someone trying to *fix* Climate change.
It was so out of place that it caught my attention, that's why I remember it. Still doesn't make me want to pony up $10 to see it in the theater, though.
I'm not concerned about global
warming cooling climate change. Weather happens.
Nope, what concerns me is that someone -think Bill Gates, or Richard Branson - may try to *do* something about it ... and really screw things up.
Ice ages have lasted a hundred thousand years or so with 10K-15K warm periods in between. We are 12K years into the latest warm period, so we are kind of due to go back to normal - cold.
It was a well built track. And of course snow and ice on the track are pierced by the train. It’s basically a live action Anime.
snow piercer = lame
snow piercer = attack of manbearpig.
Metropolis is an interesting case. Metropolis was a landmark work of science fiction. The US theatrical release was a severe dystopian, anti-capitalist story. During a recent restoration project for the film, however, additional footage was discovered along with a far differently edited and longer version of the film that turned the whole message on its head with a strong anti-communist, anti central-planning message. On the whole the newly discovered version makes a lot more sense story-wise and is an even more compelling work and is probably the "original" version intended by the writer. I think, IIRC, that this version was found in a film vault in Argentina. There was a great documentary about the painstaking restoration process to save this vital piece of filmmaking history.
I'm having a little trouble with the premise. Why a train? So there's just some hundreds of people left in the world and they've decided to ride around on a train?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.