Skip to comments.NJ teacher faces prison for sex talk with students
Posted on 07/18/2014 9:29:02 PM PDT by Morgana
CAMDEN, N.J. (AP) - A teacher and former councilman in Camden County faces prison after admitting he engaged in inappropriate sexual communications with 17 male students.
Charles Reilly is scheduled to be sentenced Friday after he pleaded guilty to official misconduct, child endangerment and attempted child endangerment.
(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxny.com ...
It would seem that queers have not only infiltrated the clergy, but the school system. G_d help us.
This is the kind of guy the left want to be scoutmasters.
The pervs always focus on the kids
I guess we all knew this was coming?
That’s nothing but a filthy fetish. The article doesn’t say if he actually put this sick plan into action and had specimens brought in. Even in this day and age, I can’t see that lesson plan being approved by a Principal as an appropriate part of the curriculum. This is Exhibit A type perverted behavior.He is lucky to still be breathing air.
Queers have always been with us, now they are becoming more brazen, more open. A few get caught, many don’t.
Now bear with me I hope I say this correctly: From what I’ve read the male molesters will molest more boys than girls before ever getting caught. That means there are more boy victim per molester than girls. Now this dude was caught for 17? From what I’ve read that means he really molested somewhere in the range of 100 to 120 boys that we don’t know of.
That is what really scares me in all of this.
You have a right to be scared. Unfortunately, a certain percentage of these molested boys will go on to molest others and the crises snowballs. That’s what scares me.
Our youth are being beaten over the head with the notion same-sex attraction is healthy and normal. I suspect this indoctrination makes them both more vulnerable to predators and less inclined to report them.
“Our youth are being beaten over the head with the notion same-sex attraction is healthy and normal. I suspect this indoctrination makes them both more vulnerable to predators and less inclined to report them.”
Actually boys are less likely to report abuse because of the sigma of being “gay”. Dr. Judith Reisman reported that a lot of boys who do report the abuse are labeled as gay from that moment on. Like in the old days when people would say a female rape victim was “asking for it” somehow. So boys would rather not report it and not be seen as “gay” thus the abuser goes on to more boys.
Start with this....and you should be able to listen to all four....it’s interesting.
And that's probably why the scriptures condemned homosexuality so strongly, and proscribed the death penalty for it.
“Like in the old days when people would say a female rape victim was asking for it somehow.”
That is a bit of a generalization; in the old days people questioned why women would expose themselves to an attack (and they still should). A drunk female leaving a bar alone at 2 am in a bad area can’t be shocked if she is raped any more than I should be shocked if I was beaten/robber doing the same thing.
“It would seem that queers have not only infiltrated the clergy, but the school system. G_d help us.”
Back at the height of the clergy rape coverage, Bill Donohue of the Catholic League complained of the double standard in reporting. He listed five sexual assaults of minors in the NYC school system in a week (basically one child molested per day), and pointed out that NONE were covered in local news. He wouldn’t defend the priests (who could/would?), but hammered home the whole double standard.
The fact is that perverts that would rape minors look for work tghat gives them access to...minors.
“A drunk female leaving a bar alone at 2 am in a bad area cant be shocked if she is raped any more than I should be shocked if I was beaten/robber doing the same thing.”
There again, “blame the victim” attitude. She’s drunk on a dark road at 2 am so she deserves to be raped? In the old days a proper Gentleman and I do mean “Gentleman” or at least a Constable would have escorted her home. Not now days, we have the idea she has the idea she has earned the right to be raped.
As for being robed. So you are saying the night belongs to the robbers? No robbers/thieves have no place in our society. Makes no difference if they are in a dark alley or on capitol hill. The person robbed had a right to walk home.
I didn’t blame anyone; I just said she shouldn’t be shocked. You think this is the nanny-state’s problem to provide a constable for her; very socialist - a cop for every wobbling drunk.
Do you know who put themselves in that situation? THE DRUNK!
As far as the night belonging to robbers, I specifically said (FOR BOTH EXAMPLES) that is was 2 am in a bad area.
Article says he taught art and soccer, how could this be unexpected?