Skip to comments.Multiple Lovers, Without Jealousy
Posted on 07/21/2014 7:17:23 AM PDT by C19fan
When I met Jonica Hunter, Sarah Taub, and Michael Rios on a typical weekday afternoon in their tidy duplex in Northern Virginia, a very small part of me worried they might try to convert me.
All three live there together, but they arent roommatestheyre lovers.
Or rather, Jonica and Michael are. And Sarah and Michael are. And so are Sarah and whomever she happens to bring home some weekends. And Michael and whomever he might be courting. Theyre polyamorous.
(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...
Man, that’s just...gross. I couldn’t imagine “sharing” a woman with another guy. Makes me sick.
polgamy has been tried many times over in human history and never works. Why do these people think it is going to work again? fools...
No, they are not “polyamorous”; they are PROMISCUOUS.
They are all telling lies. You cannot defy the innate nature of Man now matter how hard you try. You can call a dog a cat all day long in liberal lalaland but the truth is its a dog. Same with these gay “lovers”. Sooner or later a dominate female will emerge and the other two will be drawn to her and things will get ugly. Knowing emotionally unstable nature of LGBT’ers one of them will end up hacked to pieces and buried in the woods somewhere and tell the dominant female that the other lover ran off with someone new. Mark my word about these nutcases. It will happen; may just take a few years though.
I don’t think this is really polygamy. My younger friends, into the culture, tell me cuckhold is a big thing now - as is swinging in general. I think this is of that flavor.
that’s not a defense, by the way...
Polyamorous is just another term for sluts, male and female.
The minute anyone starts caring more about someone else here, than he does about his own personal appetites, there will be "jealousy."
These sorts of things are attempted all the time - they are temporary for a reason.
Living on Lies is what they do best these days and they try to foist it on society as normal. Pretty soon they will make a book for children on it...
“Mommy has Lots of Freinds”
Maybe it’s just me, but do the people in the article come across as totally narcisstic and selfish?
You are right. The liberals laughed and demeaned all of us who talked about the slippery slope during the homosexual marriage debates.
We are well on the way to normalizing homosexual marriage. The next step is polgamy/group marriage, featuring any number of partners, any gender of partners.
The same legal arguments made for homosexual marriage can be made for polygamy and group marriage.
And if liberal judges get these cases, we could see this happen.
First we have changed marriage so that it’s just any two people. For now we still have monogamy intact. It seems clear that the concept of monogamy will be done away with as well.
What are they, garter snakes?
Gives me a headache just reading it, which is what happens to me when I encounter evil.
No, they're perverted lowlifes. Just my opinion, of course.
This was all presaged by the notion of “free love” that has been around as part of the libertarian socialist movement since the mid-1800’s at least.
Which was just attempting to stuff immorality that has always been around into an organized ideology of sorts.
Even if these people can “Make it work” common sense and experience indicates these people are “Statistical Outliers” and as such should not be used as an example for “making policy”.
This is the problem with the liberal agenda, they try to take “Statistical Outliers” and pass them off as the “Normal Trend”. Which is mathmatically dishonest.
They all have or will soon all be infected with herpes and HPV and other more transitory STD’s. YUCK!
That three moonbats in Northern Virginia want to play make believe all the day long bothers me not at all. I don’t care who they are and what they do in private. Unfortunately, it never ends there with these people. Their fragile psyches demand that society embrace their behavior to the extent that we must make it mandatory and have practical exercises in schools so that children can learn the joys of the progressive lifestyle.
However happy and free of jealousy these three may be, they are the exception to be sure. Relationships are complicated and exponentially so when more than one male and one female are in the mix. Let’s check back with the happy godless souls in about three years and see how both their business and their home life is going.
[ Maybe its just me, but do the people in the article come across as totally narcisstic and selfish? ]
There is a certain amount of “docsonnectedness” one has to have in order to “make it work” because they have to basically disconnect themselves from a certain part of their OWN human NATURE...
They can repeat that lie a million times but it still won't be true.
Why not? I mean if they allow gays to marry why not allow everything else?
The title is absolute rubbish. These are sex junkies not lovers. Once again the scum villainy in media tries to kidnap the common sense of terms.
Seems to me if the cohabitation laws haven’t been enforced in decades we pretty much have had polygamy for a while. The only difference is they will be able to punish you for not accepting it when it is officially accepted in the state’s definition of marriage. In a certain sense serial civil divorce and remarriage is kind of like polygamy in slow motion, especially when the same people keep marrying and divorcing each other.
Ha, promiscuous, exactly. Nothing to brag about. CERTAINLY nothing to write about. The Atlantic must be desperate for copy.
Very animalistic. They could be a group of monkeys.
You and me baby, aint nothin but mammals
So lets do it like they do on the Discovery Channel
The real problem with this story is not the deviancy of these sickos - there will always be some deviants in society. The real problem here is the author’s comment (re mulling of a possible conversion), which reflects how our society not only fails to abhor and reject such deviancy, but in fact elevates it to being on some kind of plain where it is not only enjoys the status of a moral equivalency, but also one of being enviable.
We need the deviants stuffed back into their closets, mostly ignored and abhored by the rest of society.
That would be much more healthy for civilization. I don’t think it can survive celebrating deviancy as moral very long.
It’s called fornicating.
I don’t know why lust is considered the pinnacle of our society, but it is.
You are right. Not a situation that will last forever and eventually when someone really starts to care about someone, the jealousy will hit the fan.
The key is NOT CARING ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE!!!
This “swinging” garbage got started in the late 60’s with the counterculture revolution, then spread quickly to the suburbs. Lasted throughout the Sordid Seventies then kind of burned out during the Reagan years.
But, it’s baaaaaaaaaaack! New & improved.
Been driving groups like this in the cab lately some talk about it....I dont know why.....
yesterday a couple walked by....The girl was strawberry blond...heavy set in a dress...normal appearance.....the guy had long hair....a short dress......with high heals....
Ive been driving lots of lesbians...and gay.....”males” lately too...but strange as they are....I MUCH prefer them to the pimps dealer-gangster types....
Thank you for posting what I was thinking. I was going “can I really call them sluts on FR???” You showed me that I could and I will. SLUTS!!!!
Those kids produced from artificial insemination will never know who the "bull" was, and never have access to half of their genealogy.
Give them time. They will gain political power and get special priviliges for themselves.
It was either that or I would make up a word. Maybe SMUTS/SMUTTS
They used to be OK for a liberal rag, but the crap they publish now is all feminism, "alternative" lifestyles, etc., etc. It's just intellectually bankrupt and creepy -- and, yes, desperate.
Multiple lovers without jealousy? Lady, make a note of this: At least one of them is lying.
“Man, thats just...gross. I couldnt imagine sharing a woman with another guy. Makes me sick.”
Me too. Some things aren’t meant to be shared, especially one’s spouse.
“....and never have access to half of their genealogy.”
Isn’t that the case for any adopted child? Even if the birth mother’s identity is eventually known, the sperm donor usually never is.
Saw a WW1 movie produced in France while the war was still on. A French soldier’s wife is raped by the Germans while he is at the front. She gives birth to a girl & when the poilu comes home on leave, he wants to kill the child because she is both the product of rape and half German.
The mother protects the girl and says, “I will raise her to be French”. Later the husband is killed in action & she marries a man who is more understanding.
I’m not a big fan of bloodlines. We are what we make of ourselves. Yes, it sometimes helps to “choose one’s ancestors wisely”.
My wife and I have always had an understanding that has worked for over 25 years of marriage.
I don’t screw around with other women and she doesn’t cut off my privates while I sleep.
As Dick Armey said during the Clinton/ Lewinsky scandal, when asked what he would do if he were in Clinton’s position, “I would be lying in a pool of my own blood, hearing my wife standing over me saying, ‘How do I reload this damn thing?’”
I went through most of the long article. Seems like the author was on the defense the whole time and the conclusion...THEY ALL FEEL JEALOUSY, then they use cognitive therapy to come to a self-accepted-truth (not an absolute truth) and believe that to calm themselves.
Evolutionists always miss the mark. The Creator made us in His image. We really all want to live with one person for our whole lives and die together unless Satan has perverted us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.