Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assault Weapons Backgrounder [USCCB position from 2005]
US Conference of Catholic Bishops ^ | February 2005 | USCCB

Posted on 08/03/2014 6:56:39 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen

February 2005

Assault Weapons

On September 13, 2004, the Assault Weapons Ban expired without action by Congress to extend it. The Ban was originally passed in 1994 to prohibit the manufacture and importation, for civilian use, of 19 specific military weapons and the future production of copycat weapons. A recent analysis by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence found that during the past ten years, while the Assault Weapons Ban was in place, the number of banned assault weapons used in crimes declined by more than 65%. The failed legislation (S. 1034), which would have extended the ban for another ten years, was sponsored by Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Charles Schumer (D-NY).

USCCB Position

In Responsibility, Rehabilitation, and Restoration, the bishops reiterated their support for legislative efforts that seek to protect society from the violence associated with easy access to deadly weapons. “As bishops, we support measures that control the sale and use of firearms and make them safer (especially efforts that prevent their unsupervised use by children and anyone other than the owner), and we reiterate our call for sensible regulation of handguns.”

During the last Congress (2003-2004), Cardinal McCarrick wrote to the White House, as well as to members of the House and Senate asking them to support the reauthorization of the Assault Weapons Ban.

What You Can Do

Conference staff has been meeting with other advocates for gun safety to discuss strategies on furthering our legislative agenda to re-institute the Assault Weapons Ban. As legislative opportunities arise we will keep you informed.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist
FYI.
1 posted on 08/03/2014 6:56:39 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Dear Conference of Bishops,

Shut up and go back to shuttling the pedophiles in your ranks from parish to parish.

Thanks,

L


2 posted on 08/03/2014 6:59:47 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

I suppose there are people who might not know that the US Conference of Catholic Bishops are proud to have working toward a socialist paradise for over 100 years. However, those who don’t know probably don’t read FR.


3 posted on 08/03/2014 7:04:27 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Uhmmmm K...

That’s from, like....10 years ago...


4 posted on 08/03/2014 7:06:32 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen
A recent analysis by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence found that during the past ten years, while the Assault Weapons Ban was in place, the number of banned assault weapons used in crimes declined by more than 65%.

Let us assume these numbers are accurate.

Would be interesting to see the raw numbers, not just the percentages.

A 67% decline from a very low number doesn't mean much.

5 posted on 08/03/2014 7:08:05 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

>> In Responsibility, Rehabilitation, and Restoration, the bishops reiterated their support for legislative efforts that seek to protect society from the violence associated with easy access to deadly weapons.

How did the bishops feel about Hitler and Stalin’s “legislative” efforts to remove “easy access to deadly weapons” from the rank-and-file?

Have the bishops evaluated the success or failure of Hitler’s or Stalin’s policies on “access to deadly weapons”?


6 posted on 08/03/2014 7:28:07 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Agree.

Since almost no crimes are committed with “assault weapons”, the numbers will be statistically insignificant.

But, regardless, it makes for good propaganda.

7 posted on 08/03/2014 7:41:40 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen
aren't these the ones who want more Hispanic liberal catholics in this country?

about 54% of catholics voted for obama in 2008; 50% in 2012.

we have roman catholicism in large part to blame for obama and other libs like him to be and remain in office.

8 posted on 08/03/2014 7:42:34 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

As always, their allegiance is not to the US constitution. They are more comfortable in a monarchy. Traitors.


9 posted on 08/03/2014 7:43:40 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

I’d hazard a guess that if Congress completely outlawed cars, the number of cars used in bank robberies would decline dramatically.


10 posted on 08/03/2014 7:55:29 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“As always, their allegiance is not to the US constitution.”

Jesus comes first.

“They are more comfortable in a monarchy.”

Well, Jesus is a King.

“Traitors.”

Nope.


11 posted on 08/03/2014 7:57:30 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Define “sensible”.


12 posted on 08/03/2014 8:16:37 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

What they mean by “sensible” is unconstitutional.

IMHO, laws and regulations infringe by definition.

To the people who advocate for gun confiscation, however, “sensible” means only elites and criminals can legally have guns.


13 posted on 08/03/2014 9:30:36 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Did Jesus outlaw rocks?

Heck, did he outlaw Anything?


14 posted on 08/04/2014 2:53:11 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

“Did Jesus outlaw rocks?”

No, He just stopped the crowd from stoning the adulterous woman wit them. And He did it by pricking their consciences.

“Heck, did he outlaw Anything?”

No, but He did tell the Jews that Moses had granted divorce to them out of his weakness. They took it for granted, but it opposed God’s will.


15 posted on 08/04/2014 3:29:06 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson