Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New abortion cases could reach Supreme Court
Politico ^ | JENNIFER HABERKORN

Posted on 10/07/2014 7:51:52 PM PDT by Morgana

The Supreme Court was asked Monday to block parts of a Texas law that restricts access to abortion, an emergency request that could be just the first of several abortion-related cases to reach the court in the upcoming term.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit on Thursday allowed Texas to implement a law that restricts abortion providers and immediately shuttered all but seven of the state’s remaining clinics. On Monday, the women’s health facilities asked the high court to essentially undo that decision, allowing them to remain open as the legal fight proceeds.

“Women’s constitutional rights and access to safe, legal abortion care have been dealt a devastating blow,” said Nancy Northrup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which is leading the legal challenge. “We look now to the U.S. Supreme Court to immediately reinstate the injunction, allow the clinics to reopen and put an end to the irreparable and unjustifiable harm to Texas women that is happening right now.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: abortion; prolife; ru486

1 posted on 10/07/2014 7:51:52 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

We don’t have a supreme court, and their recent deferment to lower courts proves their illegitimacy.

I don’t think I’ll be accepting any decisions by any ‘supreme court’ post-1900. All had a high presence of leftist traitors


2 posted on 10/07/2014 7:58:21 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

If SCOTUS has no problem with queer marriage, why would they appose abortion?


3 posted on 10/07/2014 8:00:23 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

note they always decline to specify exactly what constitutional rights grant abortion. they sure the hell say it, and plural, but hever explain what part of the document they come from.

because they can’t, when pressed.


4 posted on 10/07/2014 8:04:12 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

If I read this article correctly it has to do with RU486. I believe they have had more trouble with that drug then they want to admit.


5 posted on 10/07/2014 8:36:10 PM PDT by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

yep


6 posted on 10/07/2014 8:53:19 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
a Texas law that restricts access to abortion

No bias here!

7 posted on 10/08/2014 3:02:48 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Feeling fine about the end of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson