Skip to comments.Actually, The Future SHOULD Belong To Those Who ‘Slander’ Muhammad!
Posted on 01/12/2015 7:00:34 PM PST by StevenCrowder
When our president says, The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam he does so under the false notion of appeasement. He believes that in his calls for civility, hell be fostering a more tolerant environment for everyone. We are the world and what have you. There are a few problems here. Firstly, lets address the word slander. By definition, slander is to make false and damaging statements about (someone). Muhammad was a hateful, warmongering, wife-beating pedophile whose dying words were that of calling for the deaths of Christians and Jews.
How can any damaging statement that one makes about such a person be false? There is no falsehood under the sun with which I could slander Muhammad (terrorism be upon him) that could possibly be worse than his actual actions. You say tomato, I say historical accuracy.
(Excerpt) Read more at louderwithcrowder.com ...
Obola - member of Ansar Al Sharia since at least 2000
But slander is something that is not true.
Ping for later
when it is accurate, is it slander?
Truth is slander to those who actively suppress it. Muslims are not even allowed to look too closely at their “religion” without a visit from the religion police (they actually have those in Islamic countries).
Well done, Steven.
HOORAY StevenCrowder! (also good work on Friday am on WAAM 1600)
The future must not belong to those who can’t handle slander, but sadly we have a Congress that ignores the will of the people and allows a radical Muslim and enemy of the US to continue to be President.
He (Jesus) will reign forever and ever. WE will reign with him as kings and priests. It's a done deal.
As the cop in Frequency tells the serial killer, "You've already gone down. You just don't know it yet."
When our president says, The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam...
...he is claiming that no one should make cartoons of Mad Mo, that even he agrees that violence against those that do are warranted.
The future SHOULD NOT belong to those who slander bacon.
No. The truth is an absolute defense against a charge of slander.
Mohammed was a violent pedophile. His followers are murderers and rapists.
Slander denotes telling a falsehood.
The truth about him is so bad you don’t have to lie.
That picture just makes me want to puke.
It is SOOOOO WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!
For Obama it’s not appeasement. He supports islam.
This whole thing is a game (albeit a deadly one). We are not slandering Mohammed when we tell the truth about him.
Besides, he is dead. It’s not about him, it’s about what has been done with the Koran. It’s about the current practices of the Islamic Religion/Government that need to be attacked.
No matter what Mohammed did, he is not the one who is coming to chop your head off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.