Skip to comments.
Is It OK to Have Sex With a Robot?
Christian Post ^
| 03/19/2015
| Napp Nazworth
Posted on 03/19/2015 8:02:48 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: SeekAndFind; Lazamataz
35 replies and not one of them is from Laz?
I think the most abvious question we all should be asking is:
"Would Laz hit it"?
41
posted on
03/19/2015 8:44:37 AM PDT
by
Psalm 73
("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
To: SeekAndFind
Perhaps.
42
posted on
03/19/2015 8:47:18 AM PDT
by
TheThirdRuffian
(RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
To: a fool in paradise
Keep the coin changer full.
43
posted on
03/19/2015 8:49:28 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: SeekAndFind
Robotsexuals? Don’t discrimnate against them. I wonder how the robot sexuals are going to fabricate their own hoax, you know, “natural sex” people such as gays and heterosexuals discriminate against them, bwah.
But hey, what is lasting love other than a pill and a robot.
44
posted on
03/19/2015 8:54:01 AM PDT
by
lavaroise
(A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall no)
To: SeekAndFind
The real issue is whether humans approach sex in a personal or non-personal way. The days of a person having one sex partner for their entire lives (married or not) is becoming exceedingly rare.
If sex is the investment in *giving* pleasure to a partner, robot sex would be totally unfulfilling. If sex is the investment in pleasuring oneself, it is already sin - whether it is performed with humans or near-humans.
Technology in this area is not going to stop because the potential market is huge as is the profit potential.
There could be an upside to this in that a) fewer STDs are likely to be spread and b) human trafficking for sex would diminish. The robots could probably also be programmed for personal taste without the consent of another human.
The spiritual argument is already answered. The societal argument is what should be debated.
45
posted on
03/19/2015 8:55:54 AM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
To: Vaduz
A disgusting but relevant consideration.
46
posted on
03/19/2015 8:57:09 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
To: SeekAndFind
I take it Underwriters Laboratories must be rating condoms now?
To: SeekAndFind
48
posted on
03/19/2015 9:03:35 AM PDT
by
Bratch
To: SeekAndFind
Almost 50 replies, and I'm the first to mention Cherry 2000? You guys are slacking off.
To: SeekAndFind
50
posted on
03/19/2015 9:07:55 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: pepsionice
Futurama did a good episode on that, "I dated a robot":
The world ends up depopulated in the 'educational' movie shown in the episode.
51
posted on
03/19/2015 9:09:50 AM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: SeekAndFind
For me, these two things well NEVER be equal:
52
posted on
03/19/2015 9:12:14 AM PDT
by
Mich Patriot
(Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown were judged by the content of their character.)
To: SeekAndFind
It is masturbation.
Which is traditionally defined as a sin.
53
posted on
03/19/2015 9:13:24 AM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: redgolum; Slings and Arrows
It is masturbation. Which is traditionally defined as a sin. The onanists are going to march in protest to change that too.
54
posted on
03/19/2015 9:26:50 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: SeekAndFind
So in relation to human sexuality and technology, would having sex with with one’s own clone be considered homosexuality or masturbation?
55
posted on
03/19/2015 9:33:03 AM PDT
by
Sawdring
To: All
the movie “Cherry 2000” defines the debate.
It also establishes the REASON forcing the issue. (feminists destroyed dating with their entitlement self absorption)
56
posted on
03/19/2015 9:35:04 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Chainsawj
“Let’s just hope the japenese DON’T invent them first, they will just lay there and not move.”
They already did. They run $6-7k depending on the “options”
Sort of like a car AC/No AC, Manual/Automatic etc :~)
https://4woodsusa.com/ NSFW
57
posted on
03/19/2015 9:39:11 AM PDT
by
Polynikes
(What would Walt Kowalski do. In the meantime "GET OFF MY LAWN")
To: SeekAndFind
58
posted on
03/19/2015 9:40:36 AM PDT
by
ansel12
(Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
To: SeekAndFind
59
posted on
03/19/2015 9:47:01 AM PDT
by
bgill
(CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: Sawdring
By that turn, can twins really commit incest?
Yes.
60
posted on
03/19/2015 9:55:45 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
