Michigan legislative action thread
Posted on 03/19/2015 10:21:04 AM PDT by cripplecreek
Declare brownies a fruit and chocolate chip cookies a vegetable. Heck, lets go the full boat and be patriotic and make them the official state fruit and vegetables.
The funny thing is that liberals are squealing about it not because they care about the health of kids but because they’re angry that someone dares push back against federal overreach.
Representative Colbeck, please reference the Constitution and tell me exactly where it says that the federal government has the NEED or even the RIGHT to regulate food for our youth. This is the problem with the GOP today. To many have lost sight of and have abandoned the conservative principle of limited government.
He hasn’t forgotten it. He just didn’t state it that way in the article.
He’s got a firm history of opposing the feds overstepping their boundaries. In fact, the national GOP would be wise to pay attention to his ideas on how to eliminate Obamacare and drive health care costs down.
”… providing a way around federal health standards that banned them."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
What is Michigan teaching its children about the Constitution? It’s certainly not the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood.
More specifically, regardless what FDR’s thug justices wanted everybody to believe about the scope of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers, those activist justices wrongly ignored that the Court had previously clarified that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to either regulate, tax and spend for intrastate commerce, or to dictate policy for intrastate schools.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
In fact, regardless that federal Democrats, RINOs, activist judges and indoctrinated attorneys will argue that if the Constitution doesn’t say that the feds can’t do something then they can do it, the Supreme Court has addressed that foolish idea too. Politically correct interpretations of the Constitution's Supremacy Clause (5.2) aside, the Court has clarified in broad terms that powers not delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific powers to regulate intrastate commerce and intrastate school policy in this case, are prohibited to the feds.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
I was wondering where in the US Constitution the federal government was given the authority to wage war on childhood obesity? But, I think I found what prevents it in Article F, Section U, Subsection C, Paragraph K, sentences Y, O, and U.
LOL, they did it while the First Lady of Food was out of the country
Don’t tell Mooch but Michigan has a vast underground salt bunker (mine) and we grow lots of sugar beets.
We’re like the Taliban of eating whatever the hell we want.
I’ll bet Smart Snacks are as good as Smart Cars.
DEFUND/DISMANTLE the Department of Education and the Department of Agriculture. Legislatures state and federal can be part time.
OUT-OF-CONTROL executive branch BUMP!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.