Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six weighty facts about gravity
Symmetry Magazine ^ | 5 Apr, 2016 | Matthew R. Francis

Posted on 04/06/2016 7:36:51 PM PDT by MtnClimber

Gravity: we barely ever think about it, at least until we slip on ice or stumble on the stairs. To many ancient thinkers, gravity wasn’t even a force—it was just the natural tendency of objects to sink toward the center of Earth, while planets were subject to other, unrelated laws.

Of course, we now know that gravity does far more than make things fall down. It governs the motion of planets around the Sun, holds galaxies together and determines the structure of the universe itself. We also recognize that gravity is one of the four fundamental forces of nature, along with electromagnetism, the weak force and the strong force.

The modern theory of gravity—Einstein’s general theory of relativity—is one of the most successful theories we have. At the same time, we still don’t know everything about gravity, including the exact way it fits in with the other fundamental forces. But here are six weighty facts we do know about gravity.

Illustration by Sandbox Studio, Chicago with Ana Kova 1. Gravity is by far the weakest force we know. Gravity only attracts—there’s no negative version of the force to push things apart. And while gravity is powerful enough to hold galaxies together, it is so weak that you overcome it every day. If you pick up a book, you’re counteracting the force of gravity from all of Earth.

For comparison, the electric force between an electron and a proton inside an atom is roughly one quintillion (that’s a one with 30 zeroes after it) times stronger than the gravitational attraction between them. In fact, gravity is so weak, we don’t know exactly how weak it is.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: gravity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 04/06/2016 7:36:51 PM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Interesting article for science geeks.


2 posted on 04/06/2016 7:37:36 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
"To many ancient thinkers, gravity wasn’t even a force"

It's not a force to modern thinkers as well. At least not those who believe in Einstein's General Relativity theory. According to it gravity is the warpage of space-time.

3 posted on 04/06/2016 7:45:12 PM PDT by ETL (You can lead a Trump supporter to critical facts & info, but you can't make him/her think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Simple - we have gravity because the earth sucks


4 posted on 04/06/2016 7:46:58 PM PDT by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Gravity undoubtedly exerts force on all objects. It is easily measured and all successful structures were designed to withstand that force.


5 posted on 04/06/2016 7:49:59 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

“Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity (proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as a force but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass/energy; and resulting in gravitational time dilation, where time lapses more slowly in lower (stronger) gravitational potential.

However, for most applications, gravity is well approximated by Newton’s law of universal gravitation, which postulates that gravity causes a force where two bodies of mass are directly drawn (or ‘attracted’) to each other according to a mathematical relationship, where the attractive force is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitation


6 posted on 04/06/2016 7:58:37 PM PDT by ETL (You can lead a Trump supporter to critical facts & info, but you can't make him/her think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

It’s a microaggression, man! It’s holding me down!


7 posted on 04/06/2016 7:58:50 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

“Use the warpage of space-time, Luke!”

“May the warpage of space-time be with you.”


8 posted on 04/06/2016 8:01:26 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking, but I know what I'm thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I don’t think of it as picking up a book. I think of it as moving the earth away from the book.


9 posted on 04/06/2016 8:11:25 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
However, for most applications, gravity is well approximated by Newton’s law of universal gravitation,

...for most applications on the surface of the earth, yes. But if NASA had used Newton's equation to plot the course of the Apollo missions to the moon, they would have missed.

10 posted on 04/06/2016 8:19:22 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

As I recall Newton wasn’t good enough for the GPS System either.


11 posted on 04/06/2016 8:21:53 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Sometimes I think that Gravity is the aspect of God that is everywhere, always.


12 posted on 04/06/2016 8:23:23 PM PDT by HandyDandy (Don't make up stuff. It wastes time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Pretty heavy.


13 posted on 04/06/2016 8:29:13 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
...for most applications on the surface of the earth, yes. But if NASA had used Newton's equation to plot the course of the Apollo missions to the moon, they would have missed.

That's a new one on me! Where do you get that? You know, they had "course corrections" in flight, and surely the uncertainties that these accounted for were much greater than the discrepancy between Newton and Einstein.

14 posted on 04/06/2016 8:30:57 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

I believe this is in reference to a time adjustment.


15 posted on 04/06/2016 8:34:15 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

m=f/a=E/c²

I think....


16 posted on 04/06/2016 8:34:45 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

don’t know but it works even in space


17 posted on 04/06/2016 8:42:28 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

Not on large scales. It requires a paradox factory to hide all its imperfections.


18 posted on 04/06/2016 8:44:45 PM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Well put.


19 posted on 04/06/2016 8:47:06 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Your equation has gravitas.


20 posted on 04/06/2016 8:49:34 PM PDT by Rockpile (GOP legislators-----caviar eating surrender monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson