Posted on 04/07/2016 7:35:28 PM PDT by IsraelBeach
Yes, let’s do support Trump instead of posting the same old refuted out-of-date “mispeaks” about Trump...
Yeah, the false narrative is that he took old lady’s land...but turned out to be just that, false...He did not take the lady’s land...Oh, and if he had, she would have been handsomely compensated...
In addition to all the examples posted here on FR regarding the positive benefits of eminent domain, my mother-in-law had hoped and prayed her property that she had lived at for over 40 years would fall under eminent domain for use as a tollway or local arboretum. She would have been very comfortable! Sadly, it did not happen—she was one street away and lived an extremely frugal life until she passed. Some of her neighbors who were able to sell their property felt they “hit the jackpot” BTW. So I say the old lady would have been far better off to sell her land to Trump if she could have—as I said, I know from personal family experience.
Outrageous that you would say Trump is a one-time baby-killer. Another falsehood. Trump never killed a baby; it is wrong of you to refer to him that way. Really sucks to be haunted by positions from nearly 20 years ago...I don’t think any of us would like that. We have all changed. Trump has changed for the better. Phyllis Schlafly, the Margaret Thatcher of conservationism and pro-life causes endorses Trump....Unless you have devoted your whole life full-time to conservative causes and pro-life activism, the fact that Trump is good enough for Phyllis Schlafly means he is good enough! If you don’t think so then you should look at her Bio-—there are few people on the planet who have done more for the conservative movement than Phyllis Schlafly!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phyllis_Schlafly
As far as philandering...Trump is now currently a happily married man with a beautiful wife and a great family. They are all smart and talented. Eh and given the rumors swirling around DC regarding Ted’s recent activities, I would tread lightly on the philandering accusation ;)
Besides, if Cruz is indeed such a stellar candidate, then you really should not need to repeat falsehoods and constantly slam Trump should you?!
Cruz can beat her.. He wins over the women voters!!! He likes to sue a lot i know that!!!
“Conservatism over incoherent populism!”
That’s a good way to say it.
Those who are supporting that incoherency will really feel chagrined once the fella takes office and does not practice conservatism at all.
He will be practicing narcissism, and we have an occupant already doing that admirably.
Huey P. is much closer to DT than Jackson was.
It also did not end well for Huey either.
Pesach-ly the question that needs to be asked - he ain't no Moses.
“Oh, and if he had, she would have been handsomely compensated...”
Oh yeah, because at one point she was offered over a million for the land, then with the eminent domain it was going to be $100,000.... Handsomely compensated... It really doesn’t matter. She did not want to sell. It was not for a public works project like a road or expressway. It was an attempt to steal one individual’s land and give it another for the benefit of the other person.
I called him a one-time baby killer supporter, which he was. In fact, he supported a doctor taking a baby, delivering the body while leaving the head still within the birth canal, drilling a hole in the base of its scull, and sticking a vacuum in to suck the brains out. Great guy...
The scary thing is, just last week he bounced around the issue like a pinball. For someone whom has seen the light and the evils of what abortion is, he certainly cannot make his mind up in what he feels about it.
That should be an indicator to you that he is lying about his position.
Just because Phyllis Schlafly is fooled by his lies, does not mean I am. Nor is the majority (60-70%) of the party.
There is ONE rumor from a tabloid run by the best friend of Trump about Cruz cheating. One.
Trump: numerous affairs, and he bragged about them in his own book.
He is a man of very low moral character, likely much lower than Bill Clinton’s, and had no business running for dog catcher, let alone POTUS.
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
I don’t know about “sick” but it does appear to be pandering. Might it also be sacrilegious? A person participating in a religious ceremony for a religion they don’t believe in?
quote-I don’t know about “sick” but it does appear to be pandering. Might it also be sacrilegious? A person participating in a religious ceremony for a religion they don’t believe in?
Ted could use it as an oppoturnity to preach the gospel.
the one Paul preached to the Corinthians in 1 Cor 15.
that Christ died for our sins ‘According to Scripture’ was buried and raised the 3rd day ‘According to Scripture’
According to Scripture, Christ died as the Lamb on PASSOVER, the 14th Day of the 1st month.
And was buried.
And then laid in the tomb all day on the first Day of UNLEAVENED BREAD, the 15th Day of the 1st month, the weekly and annual Sabbath day- (even in death the Lamb of God obeyed His Word)
and was raised the 3rd Day, which is the Feast of FIRST FRUITS, the 16th Day of the 1st month, the day the wave sheaf of the first of the harvest.
The gospel according to Scripture. (Leviticus 23 and other places)
The Apostle Paul said He was our PASSOVER Lamb(1 COR 5:7) and UNLEAVENED BREAD (1 COR 5:8) and called Him the FIRST FRUITS of those who have fallen asleep (1 Cor 15:20)
14th day- Passover, the 6th Day of 2nd week
15th day-Unleavened Bread, the 7th Day of 2nd week
16th day- First Fruits, the 1st day of the 3rd week
The gospel, according to Scripture.
Paul also warns about other Jesus’ and other gospels.
What the world calls ‘Jewish Feasts’ are not exclusive to Judaism. They are the Father’s Feasts that He taught His people. They pointed back to Moses and Israel but incredibly forward to His Son and His Kingdom.
And He can lead us to know His Son had major life events (birth to the giving of the Holy Spirit) on those Feast Days. Christianity and Judaism and Islam would be blessed to understand.
It is because the world accepts another version of the gospel from what Paul taught, that the world been blinded to Truth.
The kicker is Judaism and Islam accept another version too, in a way, but they can’t see it or how they apply it to their lives.
What a way to see the world! Eyes to see that only He provides
All for His Glory!
I agree with you except Ted did not do that.
That’s odd, because every authority written at the time of the founding and in the first 20-30 years after the adoption of the Constitution makes it quite clear that he is, without question, eligible.
You are obviously part of the nevertrump crowd. II find your thinking very scary—I don’t see the same things you do when I look at Trump and Cruz.
Say hello to GOPe or Hillary.
“I don’t see the same things you do when I look at Trump and Cruz.”
“As far as philandering...Trump is now currently a happily married man with a beautiful wife and a great family. They are all smart and talented. Eh and given the rumors swirling around DC regarding Ted’s recent activities, I would tread lightly on the philandering accusation ;)”
Yet you perpetuate that slander...
I am part of the crowd wanting a constitutional conservative, not a socialist liberal operating in disguise like Trump.
If Cruz came out and flip flopped all over issues to the degree Trump has, he would lose my support.
If Cruz supported abortion like Trump has/does (which is it, I’m not sure...) he would lose my support.
He hasn’t, and won’t do anything like that, because he is a man of principle and conviction, hence you can count on him to do what he says.
Yes, we see them differently. I see Ted as a flip flopper on trade and immigration, which is why Sessions and Palin did not support him. His wanting to increase H-1B Visas was the reason I could not support him last year. Sorry, I am not alone in that assessment. He changes what he says he will do. Time will tell if he actually stops changing his positions and does what he says he will—he has not done that much as he is a freshman senator who had a very elite establishment background.
I am not perpetuating slander...I just said if I were you, I would be careful throwing around accusations about Trump philandering given the rumors in DC....I did not say they were true...time will tell. Trump has not “philandered”
for years, yet you see fit to post that in every comment....but we don’t know what is going on with Ted yet. I hope all names and numbers are released—I doubt they will be because the files are full of GOPe “good family men” Regardless, my stating that is not perpetuating slander.
You blow off support/endorsement of Phyllis Schlafly. Whatever. But I don’t. I also don’t blow off Jerry Falwell, Franklin Graham and Pat Robertson as well as all the other quality Trump supporters.
Principle...That Man of principle acted very shiftily if not downright dishonest in his dealings regarding Carson in Iowa...and has just had a new accusation leveled regarding underhanded activities to pilfer or wrangle or whatever you want to call it regarding the taking votes from Trump. Oh and I really thot he was low-brow when he criticized Trump campaign and basically gave the anarchist disruptors in Chicago a pass on their harassing and violent activities. I really did not not appreciate that because I was ambushed in a car by a couple hundred of them....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3418729/posts
Cruz is now a first-term senator willing to do whatever it takes to get elected...OK to be supported by Romney, Graham, Bush, and Bush operatives, gay hoteliers even tho he supported the defense of marriage act, Goldman Sachs....whatever and whoever. I really think you are going to be disappointed if you believe he is anything more than a power hungry politician.
I am part of the crowd that does not want a Trojan horse. I want liberty and national sovereignty and I believe Trump will facilitate that. There are lots of us here.
But, you need not reply because we obviously won’t agree on basically anything.
Seems that you forgot a word, so I can’t tell how much you’re trying to insult me, Californian.
The insults come when there’s no substance. *yawn*
Yes, and we’ve finally had enough of your group’s insults, so we’re going to be playing in the same league for a change.
Enjoy toots.
“Toots” - you Trumpettes are so charming. But, my pet, charm does not substitute for substance. ;-)
Projection doesn’t work here.
You Cruz folks need a dose of reality.
So he accepts an invitation to a groups highest valued observance - and he's "pandering"
and if he had refused, I can guarantee y'all'd be screaming "RUDE" "Anti-Semitic" etc.
You people can't even be honest with yourselves.
You just knee-jerk anything and everything by/about Cruz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.