Posted on 07/08/2017 3:19:12 PM PDT by ColdOne
Right after an article titled “New Holes in Loretta Lynch’s Story on the Clinton Probe”
by Paul Sperry, New York Post
The Slime is so transparent.
NYT = ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...They have crossed over into irrelevancy.
One of my friends adopted her daughter from Russia 21 years ago.
I think she voted for Hillary.
Did Candidate Trump tell the Russian Lawyer that he would be more flexible after the Election regarding the reduction of our Nuclear Arsenal?
My Buddy is Marrying a very nice and successful Russian Lady in a couple of Months. I’d better let the NYT’s know (just in case, wink, wink).
How can any sane person, including Matt Drudge who currently has this story in red on his website, refer to the New York Times for news in any way, shape, or form?!
I’m proud to say that I did not click the Drudge link and I will not be clicking this link to give these habitually, lying publications ANY hits.
I forgot his name so I could say it came from an Anonymous Source, just like all of there other BS.
Amen, amen!! Ditto!
Well, lessee, they got their special counsel and now they have a “link” (which escaped the notice of anyone for half a year despite INTENSE scrutiny). Hell bent on starting a war...
Just call me Deplorable Colluder.
Guess Trump’s G20 summit meetings went well cause the NYT has to “drop a nothing burger bomb”.
This too shall go nowhere. Circa is already going after this story.
Keep doing what you are doing Mr. president.
Guess Trump’s G20 summit meetings went well cause the NYT has to “drop a nothing burger bomb”.
This too shall go nowhere. Circa is already going after this story.
Keep doing what you are doing Mr. president.
So, THIS is the NYT answer to Putin’s demand for proof???
LMAO...
Yeah, and?
So, according to the failing Times, 64 million red-blooded Americans voted for Trump because so and so met a Russian lawyer? This is beyond parody.
Oh brother, here we go again.
I knew the MSM would be planning another fake "bombshell" story timed for after the summit. I guess this week it's the NYT's turn to "break" the story... the others will all soon publish the same thing prefaced with "it has been reported that...".
Their behavior is entirely predictable.
Mueller’s office is leaking like a sieve. Time for him to hear, YOU’RE FIRED!
A link to what? Did Donald Trump Jr or Manfort ask the Russian woman they met with to send a phishing email to Pedestal the following March 2016? Did they specifically ask her to hack Podesta’s emails? The DNC emails were not a HACK they were a LEAK, meaning an inside job. So what is the accusation?
Are they accusing the Trump team of asking the Russians to convince a DNC worker to leak the DNC emails to Wikileaks a week before the Democratic Convention? These accusations do not hold up with the time line or the email leaks in general.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.