Skip to comments.CALIFORNIA DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL ARRESTED ON CHILD PORN CHARGES
Posted on 07/29/2017 9:33:39 PM PDT by Beave Meister
CALIFORNIA DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL ARRESTED ON CHILD PORN CHARGES
JULY 27, 2017
CRIMELIBERALPOLITICS126 COMMENTS2 MIN READ California Deputy Attorney General Raymond Liddy has been charged with possessing child pornography following an extensive, months-long investigation.
According to Reuters, Liddy, the 53-year-old son of Watergate burglar G. Gordon Liddy, was arrested at his home in Coronado, California on Tuesday.
He stands accused of possessing images depicting minors under the age of 12 in sexual situations.
According to The San Diego Union-Tribune, the investigation began when an electronic service provider tipped the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children off in January about the distribution of child pornography.
That was followed by another tip about a month later, which ultimately led to the information being passed along to the San Diego Internet Crimes Against Children task force, which was able to trace the activity to a home in Coronado.
According to The San Diego Union-Tribune, two FBI agents and a task force officer subsequently interviewed Liddy on Tuesday. He reportedly admitted to distributing the pornography but claimed that most of the images were of adults, while some may have been of children.
Authorities subsequently obtained a warrant to search Liddys home and found, according to The San Diego Union-Tribune, numerous photographs on a computer and thumbdrive of minors engaged in sexual conduct.
One of those images reportedly showed a nude girl blindfolded and tied up.
(Excerpt) Read more at milo.yiannopoulos.net ...
G. Gordon Liddy’s son.
likely a set up - he must of pissed off the wrong people
Sad. G. Gordon is a good Catholic. His wife was a saintly woman.
He’s lucky the Navy SEAL’s didn’t get to him first, that’s where they train...
“likely a set up.”
How do you set a person up to distribute child porn?
Down boy, remember 3 things:
(1) He has yet to be convicted of anything.
(2) He's a Republican in the putrid Democrat morass known as California.
(3) He is the son of G Gordon Liddy, a man Liberals hate only a little less than President Trump.
I don't know if he's guilty or not, but I do know I am very uncomfortable with the scene surrounding him. We will see.
It does not appear that the accused is denying the allegation.
I may be just imagining things, but it seems like I remember something about when Obama’s new Dept. of Defense (read ‘social changes/paradigm shift’) was being pushed through, many military leaders who wasn’t on board were found with child porn and forced to resign? Not to mention being pretty easy for a hacker (or other very knowledgeable entity) to get into someone’s computer. Granted this guy could be as guilty as sin. But just strange wonderings in this sleepy mind of mine tonight.
“Not to mention being pretty easy for a hacker (or other very knowledgeable entity) to get into someones computer.”
Do you believe that a hacker entered Liddy’s brain causing him to admit to these accusations?
“It does not appear that the accused is denying the allegation.”
He is admitting to having pornography, but denying the criminal child porn charge.
Threats of false accusation with manufactured evidence would neatly explain why so many roaring lion GOP election winners turn into sheep as office holders.
“He is admitting to having pornography, but denying the criminal child porn charge.”
Most were adults.
Some may have been children.
“He reportedly admitted to distributing the pornography but claimed that most of the images were of adults, while some may have been of children.”
It is not that I believe he was setup, etc. I am just saying the possibility exists. It is noteworthy to observe any other things going on this guys life, political, business, shady dealings too. And also any other allegations he may have had against him. Lots of items to be aware of. But like I said too, he could certainly be very guilty. I am just trying to consider all possibilities.
I really son’t understand these people. Willing women are a dime a dozen. But they don’t want women.
You would think G Gordon’s son would be smarter than to be mixed up in such a thing.
Poor G Gordon :-( He certainly does not need this $hit messing up his golden years.
Could be some kind of a set up, unless he has admitted to this.
By saying “some” “may” have been children, he establishes his position that he does not know - therefore he did not “knowingly” exchange underage pictures.
What people seem not to know is that there is a federal law that requires hosting providers to scan images and provide reports of child pornography to the NCMEC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.