Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The US Must Take Decisive Action on North Korea
Kinvig on Politics ^ | 8/9/2017 | Cameron Kinvig

Posted on 08/09/2017 3:44:21 PM PDT by ckinv368

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: ckinv368

Something to keep in mind, the Korean War never ended. We are still at war so the President does not need to get Congress approval.

My fear is we no longer have patriots at the top level of our Government or the Military. The plans for an attack will be leaked as soon as they are made.


21 posted on 08/09/2017 4:40:04 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster; ckinv368

The article is very well written and informative. It was posted in its entirety. I’ve looked at the blog, and it is replete with other articles of similar quality. Welcome to FR, ckinv368, which as you can see has its share of the underinformed over-opinionated.


22 posted on 08/09/2017 4:41:02 PM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368
If it comes to war -- seems likely -- then I would reword this a bit:

This effort will require more than cruise missiles and stern statements, and will bear the hallmarks of a major military operation, with hundreds of bombs and missiles, dozens of aircraft and ships, and the full military might of the United States.

to: "This effort will require more than cruise missiles and stern statements, and will bear the hallmarks of a major military operation, with many thousands of bombs and missiles, over a thousand aircraft, many ships... essentially all military might the United States can apply, plus all of the considerable capabilities of the South Koreans, and everything the Japanese can add, as well."

It would not take all that to knock out North Korea's nuclear capability, but it WILL take all that to rapidly quash a determined North Korean attack on Seoul.

23 posted on 08/09/2017 5:01:50 PM PDT by Paul R. (I don't want to be energy free, we want to be energy dominant in terms of the world. -D. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.

Somethings got to give
You can only keep keep forces on hair trigger alert so long


24 posted on 08/09/2017 5:05:04 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

Quit it DUMBASSES How did we deal with this in the 50s and 60s during the COLD WAR with Russia? he he They had way more sophisticated ICBMs than the NORKS? At one point we had bombers in the air 24/7 armed with Nuclear weapons that flew over the North Pole and back. Most here do not remember that.

Throughout the late 1950s and into the 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had been developing missile systems with the ability to shoot down incoming ICBM warheads. During this period, the US considered the defense of the US as part of reducing the overall damage inflicted in a full nuclear exchange. As part of this defense, Canada and the US established the North American Air Defense Command (now called North American Aerospace Defense Command).

By the early 1950s, US research on the Nike Zeus missile system had developed to the point where small improvements would allow it to be used as the basis of an operational ABM system. Work started on a short-range, high-speed counterpart known as Sprint to provide defense for the ABM sites themselves. By the mid-1960s, both systems showed enough promise to start development of base selection for a limited ABM system dubbed Sentinel. In 1967, the US announced that Sentinel itself would be scaled down to the smaller and less expensive Safeguard. Soviet doctrine called for development of its own ABM system and return to strategic parity with the US. This was achieved with the operational deployment of the A-35 ABM system and its successors, which remain operational to this day. http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/30/politics/pentagon-missile-test-north-korea-iran/index.html


25 posted on 08/09/2017 5:12:43 PM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (---->VMFA 235 '69 -'72 KMCAS <--- F4 PHANTOM... FLYING BRICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

Too late I would say.


26 posted on 08/09/2017 5:13:19 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

If they can put one in a missile they can put one in a torpedo and covertly launch them in major ports.


27 posted on 08/09/2017 5:38:29 PM PDT by Daniel Ramsey (Thank YOU President Trump, finally we can do what America does best, to be the best!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

Activate Star Wars.

Use Trident submarines.

Unload. Turn N Korea, china and the Muslim world into sheets of glass . No more problems.

It’s what I would do.


28 posted on 08/09/2017 6:07:43 PM PDT by Democrat_media (News Media,Mueller & democrat party doing a coup against Trump w/ Russia lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368; humblegunner

Welcome to FR.
Sic `em boy.


29 posted on 08/09/2017 6:24:04 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

This is probably not going to end well.


30 posted on 08/09/2017 6:29:37 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

Shocking


31 posted on 08/09/2017 6:38:58 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368
Yeah, but it was the last thought in the article that got to me. The author speculates that maybe Kim will spare California because most people there didn't vote for Trump.

Maybe Kim is really stupid. After all, Hitler sent the German army into Russia without winter clothing. But, my guess is that Kim wants Lockheed Martin in San Jose.

32 posted on 08/09/2017 7:21:36 PM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson