Skip to comments.
Professor Says Women Are Ruining Their Chances of Getting Married By Being So Sexually Cheap
Jezebel ^
| September 29. 2017
| Aimée Lutkin
Posted on 09/29/2017 6:21:22 PM PDT by EdnaMode
Edited on 09/29/2017 8:07:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Feminist Aimee Lutkin refers to a Wall Street Journal article as "trollish."
1
posted on
09/29/2017 6:21:22 PM PDT
by
EdnaMode
To: EdnaMode
There could be some truth to this.Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?
To: Gay State Conservative
3
posted on
09/29/2017 6:24:43 PM PDT
by
Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
(Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: Autonomous User
or taking the old log to the beaver!
5
posted on
09/29/2017 6:28:31 PM PDT
by
Autonomous User
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: EdnaMode
There is nothing less interesting.....and less worthy...than an easy woman.
6
posted on
09/29/2017 6:29:36 PM PDT
by
Az Joe
(Gloria in excelsis Deo)
To: EdnaMode
I think this is ABSOLUTELY true. 100%. Spot on.
Completely, absolutely right.
7
posted on
09/29/2017 6:30:05 PM PDT
by
cba123
( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
To: EdnaMode
When I entered my teens, young women were taught not only to withhold sex before marriage, we were even told to be stingy with our kisses, lest a boy get the wrong idea. The advice would be scorned by today’s teen girls, which is unfortunate. It was the right advice then and it’s the smart thing to do now.
It’s nice to see men admit it.
8
posted on
09/29/2017 6:32:16 PM PDT
by
Wiser now
(Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
To: EdnaMode
I see a great future for cats.
To: EdnaMode
10
posted on
09/29/2017 6:35:46 PM PDT
by
treetopsandroofs
(Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
11
posted on
09/29/2017 6:36:54 PM PDT
by
treetopsandroofs
(Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
To: Autonomous User
12
posted on
09/29/2017 6:37:03 PM PDT
by
bagster
(I crack myself up.)
To: Wiser now
Yet when they go to college, they are brainwashed with “all men are rapists/predators/oppressors”. And men are afraid to even say “good morning” to them lest a sexual harassment complaint be filed. I have worked around some women like this at an engineering company.
13
posted on
09/29/2017 6:38:55 PM PDT
by
Fred Hayek
(The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
To: EdnaMode
The two technologies Regnerus names are birth controlwhich he admits has been around for 60 years, so its unclear why family planning is a modern culpritand pornography:
Are they thinking that “family planning” refers to married couples only using contraception?
I’ll spell it out for them. Young women taking the pill will be more likely to have sexual intercourse, because they won’t have to worry about getting pregnant. Birth control is a modern culprit, because it takes away a major consequence of sex activity outside marriage.
Does he really think that only married couples use so called “family planning”??
To: EdnaMode
So the article's point is for women to be glad they had sex with a manipulative guy, because they could have ended up marrying him if they withheld sex.
Stupid and untrue point, because the manipulative guy wasn't looking for marriage, he was looking for sex with no strings and got it. If a woman sees through and dumps this shallow type of guy (I won't call him a man) or otherwise withstands the manipulation, he moves on to an easier target.
BTW, from the earlier comments and the unedited and unnecessary f-word in the article, what has FR become lately?
To: Gay State Conservative
Since he looks upon women as cows. Yeah.
16
posted on
09/29/2017 6:41:40 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
To: Az Joe
And if we’re not easy we’re stuck up. Got it.
17
posted on
09/29/2017 6:42:35 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
To: Az Joe
Being easy lessens one sexual market value and that correlates to whether a woman is marriage material. And its no shocker that promiscuity cases have a higher divorce rate. So why would a man give his resources to an easy woman, especially in a marriage contract where the other person can actually cheat on you and then legally take half your stuff?
To: EdnaMode
Written by some guy who’s frustrated no woman would look at him so he comes out with this trash.
19
posted on
09/29/2017 6:44:25 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
To: EdnaMode
20
posted on
09/29/2017 6:45:12 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson