Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea says ‘a nuclear war may break out any moment’
Washington Post ^ | October 16 at 7:26 PM | Edith M. Lederer

Posted on 10/16/2017 4:40:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Kim In Ryong told the U.N. General Assembly’s disarmament committee that North Korea is the only country in the world that has been subjected to “such an extreme and direct nuclear threat” from the United States since the 1970s — and said the country has the right to possess nuclear weapons in self-defense.

He pointed to large-scale military exercises every year using “nuclear assets” and said what is more dangerous is what he called a U.S. plan to stage a “secret operation aimed at the removal of our supreme leadership.”

...

He told the disarmament committee that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea — North Korea’s official name — had hoped for a nuclear-free world.

“The DPRK consistently supports the total elimination of nuclear weapons and the efforts for denuclearization of the entire world,” he said. But as long as the United States rejects the treaty and “constantly threatens and blackmails the DPRK with nuclear weapons ... the DPRK is not in position to accede to the treaty.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2017 4:40:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

In 0bama’s world it would have been ‘well okay’ but in Trump’s world: “Oh hey, you really don’t want to be going there”.


2 posted on 10/16/2017 4:43:01 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Rut Roh

BYE BYE


3 posted on 10/16/2017 4:43:55 PM PDT by Thomas Truxtun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

4 posted on 10/16/2017 4:44:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (You can't have totalitarian globalist government if the peasants are armed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If it does I predict that North Korea will never know the outcome of it.


5 posted on 10/16/2017 4:45:03 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The basic issue at play is that countries that continually threaten nuclear attacks on another country to reduce that country to ashes cannot be permitted to obtain nuclear weapons and their development must be prevented at any cost

North Korea and Iran are two notable examples


6 posted on 10/16/2017 4:47:27 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Oh Noes Rocket Man.
7 posted on 10/16/2017 4:50:52 PM PDT by Autonomous User (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yawn


8 posted on 10/16/2017 4:51:30 PM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Trade California for NK?


9 posted on 10/16/2017 4:51:32 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Just communists, democrats and media trying to distract Trump.


10 posted on 10/16/2017 4:52:30 PM PDT by JPJones (Who is FOR tariffs? George Washington, Ronald Reagan and Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Obama just wanted both Iran and NK to go nuclear after he left office. Beyond that, he could not have cared less.


11 posted on 10/16/2017 4:53:28 PM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Well, a nuclear war with DPRK would be quite brief.


12 posted on 10/16/2017 4:54:25 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

You are correct of course.


13 posted on 10/16/2017 4:56:38 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I worry about just south of the DPRK.


14 posted on 10/16/2017 4:58:15 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Screw The NFL!!!!!! My family fought for the flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

And their people will be able to tell the difference how? If it come down to just the difference between being on fire roasted alive and not, you have already lost the war and the rest to come.


15 posted on 10/16/2017 5:01:55 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

“I worry about just South of the DPRK”

Worry about your own country.


16 posted on 10/16/2017 5:07:47 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

The Norks have cleaner cities.


17 posted on 10/16/2017 5:16:38 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
In 0bama’s world it would have been ‘well okay’ but in Trump’s world: “Oh hey, you really don’t want to be going there”.

Go where, exactly? I refuses to go behind a WP paywall, but the headline seems misleading and melodramatic. He is not saying that he would start a nuclear war, but rather that they wouldn't sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty. What do you think that Trump's reaction to that refusal would be? Given what has happened to countries that played ball (Libya, for example), wouldn't it make more sense for potential adversaries, such as NK, to not sign?

Basically, I don't how this moves the needle, much, if at all. His statement about nuclear war perhaps starting is not a statement of intent, but rather a segue into the point that NK needs to be able to defend itself (not an accurate deduction, but hardly the the-world-is-about-to-end connotation implied by the headline). In fact, while NK may be the most evil, hideous, and cruel government to exist in at least 1/2 a century (if not much more), it is hard to see what is wrong with NK's position on this one. Signing the NPT would be a disaster for them, with no upside. Is there something else in the article that is of importance?
18 posted on 10/16/2017 5:20:51 PM PDT by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

The Norks have cleaner cities.

They have one city with no people in it!


19 posted on 10/16/2017 5:25:02 PM PDT by Davy Crocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Basically Bush Sr, Clinton and Obama removed our leverage by denuking South Korea. Now Kim asks for US/International full disarmament ...

And you all think Russia and China do not stand behind this? It is for their benefits to put up America as some kind of bully which needs disarmed


20 posted on 10/16/2017 5:27:09 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson