Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber

I think the 6.5 Grendel would be a great upgrade. The existing lowers would be usable and the only replacements that would be needed would be the upper(barrel) assembly and magazines. The 6.5 Grendel has an effective range of 800 plus yards.
Army will never do it, it would save too much money.


6 posted on 04/12/2018 6:45:12 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pleasenotcalifornia

Yeah, going to the Creedmore would cost a fortune , having to go to the AR-10 type lower etc..

Grendel or .224 Valkyrie would be a lot cheaper and wouldn’t require a complete platform change, but meet the needs of an average Army or Marine infantryman.


10 posted on 04/12/2018 6:58:44 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: pleasenotcalifornia

Agreed. The Grendel is a very versatile cartridge.


13 posted on 04/12/2018 7:02:56 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: pleasenotcalifornia

I built a 6.5 Grendel and a couple of 5.56 rifles. The 330 blackout is great for urban setting. The 6.5 on a AR 10 type weapon could be pretty impressive in open country. The ability to pack a large amount of ammo comes into play. Control of recoil in auto falls in there too. The Grendel with 123 grain bullets adds something to the argument over the 5.56. The issue is what compromises should the troops have to make? It’s a tough issue with no clear cut solutions on a changing battlefield.


15 posted on 04/12/2018 7:08:05 PM PDT by Equine1952 (Close up 12 ga # 4 buck. Far 300 win. Each is great if you have an ammo carrier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson