Posted on 06/11/2018 11:00:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Driving to our RV, I noticed that New Hampshire has millions of these industrial-grade machines, solar-powered, that pull CO2 from the air autonomously, with a harmless by-product called Oxygen.
They are called trees!
Once in commercial use, the next thing you know, vegetation is dying from lack of co2.
Save the redwoods!!
Oh, great! They’re going to cause another ice age!
and when they reduce man’s CO2, which amounts to just 0.00136% of the atmosphere down to say 0.00134%, and nothing happens- what then?
0.00136% of the atmosphere is NOT causing climate change folks- The could reduce the amount to 0.0000136% and it still wouldn’t do a thing to ‘reverse climate change’ whatever that is supposed to mean- the climate changes in both directions naturally- always has, always will- man is NOT accelerating it nor slowing it down
I would rather that stupid, dishonest humans not remove co2 from the atmosphere, kthx.
I actually use quite a few large “CO2 scrubbers” on my property and a LOT of miniature versions. They very effectively pull the CO2 right out of the atmosphere and, via chemical reaction actually produce an output of O2 (oxygen).
The really big ones I call trees. The smaller ones I call Bushes, weeds, grass.
They’re proven effective.
I would rather that stupid, dishonest humans not remove co2 from the atmosphere, kthx.
I’m for anything that will drive AlGore to the poor house.
I would rather they not generate any CO2 if they truly believe it is a problem. The fact that they continue to make it and scold the rest of us is hypocritical.
Absurd on the face of it. Sounds like marketing for investment.
What is it?
Plants and Trees
Can’t argue with that.
Don’t see why their continued existence should be tolerated considering their constant pollution.
Now we just need a way to remove oxygen and water vapor from the atmosphere. Get it down to just nitrogen. That will clean up the pesky life on Earth.
This is a floraist scheme. Fauna Nazis hating flora clearly.
industrial carbon-sucking schemes are like magic battery technological advances ... always just around the corner ... always soon-to-be economical ...
case in point here: at $200/ton how many billons of trillions of dollars will it take to capture enough CO2 to reduce the atmospheric levels by even 1 part per million, and what is the carbon cost to build enough capture factories to do that?
It also has the magical mechanisms that know how to scale and manage to create an equilibrium that keeps the earth at life sustaining levels.
All without us doing a thing!
Could easily become a case of the cure being worse than the disease.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.