Skip to comments.Bad news conspiracy theorists. QAnon codes are just a guy mashing his keyboard
Posted on 08/15/2018 6:42:05 PM PDT by pluvmantelo
Researcher Mark Burnett is a world authority on passwords. Think Im kidding? He has collected millions of passwords over the last couple of decades, and has written a book about the real-life password analyses he has done. It shouldnt be any surprise then to hear that hes the kind of guy whos familiar with the different way people choose passwords - including those who think they can generate a really random password by just mashing their keyboard like a crazy man. Enter the bat-shit crazy QAnon conspiracy theory, which - amongst other things - believes that there is a huge undiscovered paedophile ring run by the powerful liberal elite.
(Excerpt) Read more at grahamcluley.com ...
Mark Burnett all of his so called intelligence couldn’t pull off Q if his life depended on it. And anyone who thinks what Q writes is random nonsense is either severely dishonest or else they have never studied Q. In this case I will say the guy is dishonest.
“While the author is clearly a Q skeptic, the argument he purveys is, in my view, cogent. Take it as you will”
What’s the argument?
Yeah, thick hide no worries. Unlike them.
Heh... I like the cut of your jib, friend.
His argument is cryptographic gibberish.
The Cat is on the Roof.
His name is QWERTY, but you can call him Q.
He drives an Aston Martin and only drinks Martini’s that are shaken, not stirred.
Mr. Diogenes would like to shake your hand.
The author is a TDS sufferer, and as such a) his arguments can be dismissed without even listening to them, and b) have no place here.
Q skeptic myself but I’m not getting decision data from the lefty cult.
You are permitted to post your anti Q threads on the forum. It’s only the pro Q threads that have been deleted and users directed to the Q thread.
The Q thread is a research thread - it used to be over run with anti Q content but is now devoted to those who want to research Q in (relative) peace.
Investigative Journalist Jen Moore was found dead in a suburban Washington D.C. hotel room Monday, according to police and shocked and distraught friends and colleagues.
Moore died of an apparent seizure. Police are closely investigating the cause of death after former FBI Agent Robyn Gritz, a friend of Moores, made inquiries with homicide detectives Monday afternoon in Prince Georges County, Maryland. Preliminary reports from police said the death was not the result of suicide.
Moores body was found by employees at the Country Inn & Suites by Radisson, Washington, D.C. East in Capitol Heights, Maryland. The investigation is ongoing. An autopsy had not been scheduled as of late Monday. Moore, an advocate who investigated abused and trafficked children, had been in the process of investigating allegations by a 26-year-old man that as a young boy he was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton and pimped out at private sex parties attended by other D.C. elites.
Another death from Arkancide?
Standard rules of decorum and etiquette don't work on the qult. All skepticism posted to their private prayer threads are treated as heresy and blasphemy.
Just for starters: Q has never explained what those “stringers,” as he calls them, are actually for. He’s never even said they’re encrypted messages. For all we know, they’re only there to confuse the deep state’s bots that scan message boards.
WTF are you talking about!?
“Confuse the deep state’s bots?” You can’t be serious.
What I don't get is, presumably Q knows all. But instead of telling all, he posts cryptic tidbits. Thousands of followers then spend countless hours digging for the truth, even though Q already knows the truth.
To me it all seems YUGELY inefficient. Which leads me to two possible conclusions.
1) Q is no economist, and thus has no concept of all the man-hours needlessly wasted in this pursuit.
2) Q is no FRiend and has many of our people plopped in front of their computers for hours on end going down one rabbit hole after another, instead of doing something productive -- like working to win the upcoming midterm elections to save the Trump presidency.
I’m serous. You, on the other had, are obviously not. If you’re going to dishonestly pretend you don’t know exactly what I’m talking about, then we have nothing further to discuss.
“also, I don’t think amongst is a word. “
why not google it instead of just guessing and wasting bandwidth?
“The thousands of Q followers online digging Marxist RAT dirt 24/7 is what the Marxist RATs are and should be nervous about.”
why? have they ever discovered anything that no one else has discovered that has profoundly changed a single significant narrative?
Why aren't we using "stringers" on FR? We have an HTML Sandbox. Maybe it's time for a Stringer Sandbox?
Interested, I was inspired to look it up. Among is actually the old word, from Old English. Amongst us from Middle English
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.