Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marines 3D-print concrete barracks in just 40 hours
fox news ^

Posted on 08/30/2018 8:29:11 AM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: rlmorel

Mud/Dirt daubers have been doing it for millions of years...............

21 posted on 08/30/2018 8:59:07 AM PDT by Red Badger (July 2018 - the month the world learns the TRUTH......Q Anon.......Timelines change. Aug 16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

20 X 25 in 40 hrs? Nice start, but a crew can erect precast slabs and trusses in an 8 hr day.

They’ll need to slick up the printing process to compete.


22 posted on 08/30/2018 9:00:15 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

heh, well, YEAH. But we can still kill em all!

Be harder to do when Marines are inside!


23 posted on 08/30/2018 9:08:39 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

500 square feet is marginal at best for a barracks. Maybe senior NCO quarters, six or so occupants.


24 posted on 08/30/2018 9:16:53 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“Gee whiz for the sake of gee whiz.”

not really ... simply the first evolutionary phase of much more sophisticated and automated equipment ... just think of this like it was the first horseless carriage that had a little internal IC engine attached to the axle ...


25 posted on 08/30/2018 9:31:06 AM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
It might be concrete but it's not reinforced concrete. Where are the steel reinforcing rods?

This is a very modest structure, about 22 feet square, about the size of a two car garage. A human crew could build a stronger structure of the same dimensions in the same amount of time easily. A trained crew that reused the forms could do it in half the time or better.
 

26 posted on 08/30/2018 9:32:52 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ("Nature, Mr. Allnut, is what we are put in this world to rise above.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Might be more protective while its still wet.....


27 posted on 08/30/2018 9:44:21 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
not really ... simply the first evolutionary phase of much more sophisticated and automated equipment ... just think of this like it was the first horseless carriage that had a little internal IC engine attached to the axle ...

When the military is using the technology to make a demonstration 'barracks,' it is gee whiz for gee whiz's sake.

When university or private research institutions, or small start-up companies are demonstrating this technology, that is your horseless carriage with a small IC engine. That sort of research is essential to develop the technology to a practical level for widespread use.

I'm not against progress or technology. I'm against blatant impractical 'demonstrations' from potential end users designed to give a false impression, when the technology is clearly not ready.

28 posted on 08/30/2018 9:46:54 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie
I see a very temporary building:

No reinforcing steel, no aggregate in the cement, every layer is a cold joint.

Any pressure testing of this type of work?

29 posted on 08/30/2018 9:49:35 AM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pollard
give me 10 mexicans and some concrete forms and I’ll have it done in a day[sic]

Er, why do you require Mexicans?

30 posted on 08/30/2018 10:00:13 AM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
The Best 3D Printing ETF
Interested in 3D printing stocks? You might consider investing in the 3D Printing ETF.

By Beth McKenna, June 22, 2017

3D printing stocks are having a great 2017, after several very tough years. The stocks of the two largest players, 3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) and Stratasys (NASDAQ:SSYS), for example, have gained 66.3% and 66.6%, respectively, this year through June 19, versus the S&P 500's 10.7% return.

Investors who are interested in 3D printing stocks but don't want to bet on just one player or even a couple of companies, have another option: a 3D-printing exchange-traded fund (ETF). We're going to explore the best (and only, to my knowledge) ETF focused on this space, The 3D Printing ETF (NYSEMKT:PRNT), to see if it's worth investing in.

31 posted on 08/30/2018 10:07:49 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie
It might be concrete but it's not reinforced concrete. Where are the steel reinforcing rods?

A wire lathe is integrated between printed passes.
(I worked on the project).

32 posted on 08/30/2018 11:02:25 AM PDT by mcmuffin (Jan. 20, 2017, Thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mcmuffin
It might be concrete but it's not reinforced concrete. Where are the steel reinforcing rods? A wire lathe is integrated between printed passes. (I worked on the project).

Odd, none of the photos in post 13 show any lathe much less rebar being placed or even anywhere in the tent enclosure. How did that work? We miss something?

33 posted on 08/30/2018 11:18:34 AM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Seriously, that thing is smaller than a Quonset hut.


34 posted on 08/30/2018 11:25:50 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Everything you said here 2x.

The tech has amazing potential. The ‘barracks’ is a joke.


35 posted on 08/30/2018 11:26:44 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
Odd, none of the photos in post 13 show any lathe much less rebar being placed or even anywhere in the tent enclosure. How did that work? We miss something?

You didn't miss a thing.

Those photos/gifs are not the same project!

36 posted on 08/30/2018 12:16:05 PM PDT by mcmuffin (Jan. 20, 2017, Thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Are they gonna hump that printer to the forward bases?


37 posted on 08/30/2018 12:43:32 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcmuffin

Ahh, well....that explains it .


38 posted on 08/30/2018 12:51:37 PM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

” When the military is using the technology to make a demonstration ‘barracks,’ it is gee whiz for gee whiz’s sake.

When university or private research institutions, or small start-up companies are demonstrating this technology, that is your horseless carriage with a small IC engine. That sort of research is essential to develop the technology to a practical level for widespread use.”

so, in other words, the military is neither allowed to test emerging technology nor to research improvements to it because that’s just “gee whiz’s sake” ...


39 posted on 08/30/2018 2:32:26 PM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1

be nice if it could print some rebar at the same time


40 posted on 08/30/2018 2:58:23 PM PDT by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson