[DUMBGRUNT]

But the global warming group would never ever 'adjust' data?

[Da Coyote]

He should be a climate researcher. They love altered data, laughable math, ridiculous computer models, all capped by the complete inability to predict anything.

And actors, politicians, and others to whom STEM curricula was anathema will love them.

[Fungi]

How about retracting this? .

[KarlInOhio]

A cadre of skeptical researchers and journalists, including BuzzFeed’s Stephanie Lee, have taken a close look at Wansink’s food psychology research unit, the Food and Brand Lab at Cornell University, and have shown that unsavory data manipulation ran rampant there.

Diet Deniers!!!! Stone them!

According to the Cornell provost, Wansink’s academic misconduct included “the misreporting of research data, problematic statistical techniques, failure to properly document and preserve research results, and inappropriate authorship.”

Michael "Hockey Stick" Mann, someone has stolen your research methods.

[Secret Agent Man]

Easy.

The university and he wanted government grants.

Government wanted his research to confirm or reject whatever things they wanted it to say.

He conducted his studies to give the government the results their grants paid for.

[Lurkinanloomin]

” Science “

[ConservativeMind]

I don’t want to say how, but I know Dr. Wansink and I can say everyone here would find him a charming and sincere man. He is the sort of person who will be totally honest with you when you ask a question and you can see how he lights up from just having the opportunity to be with you.

However, I can see how he could choose to ignore data that might not seem supportive or relevant, but then, I can see how this would be an easy choice for so many researchers. Unfortunately, marketing personalities are not often rigorous personalities. “Rigor” talent goes to computer science, statistics, finance, accounting, medical, and engineering disciplines.

[Reverend Wright]

“JAMA said Cornell couldn’t “provide assurances regarding the scientific validity of the 6 studies” because they didn’t have access to Wansink’s original data.”

“Professor” Michael Mann has put the same sort of restrictions on access to his original data.

[metesky]

Food, climate, second hand smoke, all the same bs results from the same bs methods.

Our lives have are being run by fraudsters in and out of government.

Is everything false?

[Grimmy]

Huh.

I read the article and came away with the feelz that it’s more of an attack by the usual SJWs (buzzfeed, etc) and that the studies under attack are rather common sense supported.

Now I’m wondering what it was he said that offended a blue-haired ring-nose and started the attack.