Watching this from the Kavanaugh hearing.
I believe that Graham is asking this question because The Clinton’s among others, are going to be proven to have been involved in crimes in accordance with the manor described.
I agree that many of the crimes would still have to be tried by the normal criminal process. But I believe that some will fit the manor described by Graham. What I am not sure of is if espionage with the purpose of compromising the security of the united states would fit the profile of being a terrorist activity.
Graham is completely correct. As I stated previously, an unlawful enemy combatant (of which there is a specific legal description in the law and the US Supreme Court cases) can be tried by tribunal.
Political criminals like Hillary, podesta, Comey, clapper and all the rest of the deep state dirtbags are not enemy combatants, as much as some folks would like to think they are. They do not meet the legal definition that the courts have set down. So, they will never be deprived of their rights under the Constitution to be tried in the federal courts by a jury of their peers.
This is not just my legal opinion, it is the opinion of almost all lawyers and judges, including Sen Graham who spent 30 years as a military lawyer. The only people who think the law is different are the anonymous boys down at the manure plant who invented the q phenomenon to have a little fun and make a little money at the same time sucking in well meaning gullible people grasping for some sense of justice.