Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia's 'Chernobyl on ice' floating nuclear reactor begins its 3,000-mile voyage [tr]
UK Daily Mail ^ | August 23, 2019 | Chris Dyer

Posted on 08/23/2019 9:42:55 AM PDT by C19fan

Russia launched the world's first floating nuclear reactor today, sending it on an epic journey across the Arctic, despite environmentalists warning it could become a 'Chernobyl on ice'.

Loaded with nuclear fuel, the Akademik Lomonosov left the Arctic port of Murmansk to begin its 3,000-mile (5,000 kilometre) voyage to Pevek in northeastern Siberia.

Nuclear agency Rosatom says the reactor is a simpler alternative to building a conventional plant on ground that is frozen all year round, and it intends to sell such reactors abroad.

But environmental groups have long warned of the dangers of the project, dubbing it a potential 'Chernobyl on ice' and a 'nuclear Titanic'.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: arctic; chernobyl; floatingreactor; nuclear; nuclearreactor; putinsbuttboys; russia
If it makes one feel better the reactors are pressurized water reactors based on existing designs used in ice breakers.
1 posted on 08/23/2019 9:42:55 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Why isn’t a nuclear sub considered a floating reactor?


2 posted on 08/23/2019 9:44:26 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Uh, what ice? Asked the swimming polar bear. 🐻
3 posted on 08/23/2019 9:46:12 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Obviously Russia is real concerned about the feelings of “environmentalists.”


4 posted on 08/23/2019 9:54:53 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

“Why isn’t a nuclear sub considered a floating reactor?”

It is a ship (boat) powered by a tractor.


5 posted on 08/23/2019 9:58:32 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

reactor


6 posted on 08/23/2019 9:58:46 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Because it’s underwater, of course.

So, a Mobile Chernobyl, if you will.


7 posted on 08/23/2019 9:59:02 AM PDT by ferret_airlift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ferret_airlift

It’s a great idea to bring power to far away Arctic islands...until it sinks! LOL!


8 posted on 08/23/2019 10:11:24 AM PDT by gr8eman (Only the mediocre are always at their best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Isn’t this the same type of power plant that drives/powers America’s nuclear naval vessels?


9 posted on 08/23/2019 10:21:36 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

BBC showed some video of the inside and it looks Rusty already


10 posted on 08/23/2019 10:22:52 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Yes. Are expecting more of journalists?


11 posted on 08/23/2019 10:25:21 AM PDT by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
If it makes one feel better the reactors are pressurized water reactors based on existing designs used in ice breakers.

No different than a nuke reactor on Guam, it can't sink, BUT, it might "tip over and capsize"


12 posted on 08/23/2019 10:48:57 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist mooselimb savages, today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
...environmental groups have long warned of the dangers of the project, dubbing it a potential 'Chernobyl on ice' and a 'nuclear Titanic'.

That's one thing that's always true about environmentalists: they stick to the hard science, 100% of the time, and never, ever resort to crazy-@ss hyper-emotionalism! /sarc

13 posted on 08/23/2019 11:38:53 AM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("He therefore who may resist, must be allowed to strike.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ferret_airlift

It can float on top of the water.


14 posted on 08/23/2019 11:53:39 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

So it uses a RBMK 1000 Reactor?

If not, its not Chernobyl

But of course, don’t let facts get in the way of scare tactic “journalism”


15 posted on 08/23/2019 12:09:14 PM PDT by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I don’t get it. To work as a power plant it still has to heat water and turn generator turbines. From there, electricity goes out through the distribution system. A floating reactor does nothing for you.


16 posted on 08/23/2019 12:12:45 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

We built one for a Greenland DEW station I believe.
It may still be there.


17 posted on 08/23/2019 12:48:21 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The title “Chernobyl On Ice” sounds like it should be an Ice Capades show. ;)


18 posted on 08/23/2019 9:04:21 PM PDT by Perhaps Today
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson