Posted on 11/06/2020 5:07:10 PM PST by OKSooner
It doesn’t matter whether you believe her. Your opinion is not relevant.
She has to be able to prove it.
Pelosi owns 50% of Scorecard. It is also used in 27 other states
Thanks.
I’m thinking something simple, like say someone told him.
I trust her but there has to be actual proof that this occurred.
Do you have a link?
Is Voting Station a precienct ballot tabulation machine?
If so, is this easily resolved by retaking the data of that machine?
So basically this is supposition on her part and she has no proof.
Back to where we started.
Someone needs to find out.
Are they all changed from Trump to Biden?
A 3% change? That's a 6 point swing?
Of course it’s supposition at this point.
But she’s got probable cause to suspect it occurred and wants an investigation.
Works for me.
I don’t think it’s in Sidney Powell’s blood to pronounce something that she can’t prove.
1) go back and hand recount
2) separate out all the ballots that only vote for POTUS and no other office or measure.
1) is easy and if the count is way off then bulldoze those machines
2) is not so easy, some people may vote for only POTUS and no local or statewide offices but if this is way outside the historic medians or national medians they must be audited and adjudicated. Where did they come from, when did they arrive etc.
This is probably a good reason to privatize the vote process and the reason why we have laws for observers but the entire process is FUBAR. Put professionals with real auditing, accounting and hard and observable rules in place for the receipt, storage, sorting, handling, counting and filing of ballots. Hard to believe that this cannot be highly automated. We can put a spacecraft on Mars but can’t count ballots. We have machines that can collate xerox papers but no machines that can sort ballots by time, region etc?
Shameful.
But I'm really not the best person to ask.
I got a C in statistics in college. 😳
Thank you, well said.
No comment.
tty. gen. material
I went back and looked at what she said.
She didnt say she has proof. She said someone needs to investigate.
Perhaps someone whispered in her ear that it happened.
That’s not enough right now.
You have to PROVE IT.
And if you don’t know, the originator said it was undetectable.
I agree!
bttt
Nothing is ‘undetectable’ with the right brains on it.
I think it is going to take a whistleblower. Without a whistleblower this is going to be hard to get going - since we know it was designed to be undetectable
The best perhaps they can do is an audit of all counties that used the program.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.