Posted to the ATF

Source? ME | 8/18/2021 | By Laz A. Mataz

[ctdonath2]

https://www.house.gov

[sauropod]

Thx!

I will submit my own.

‘Pod.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

Irenic : "I guess they figure if the CDC can make law then they may as well give it a whirl. :) "

I agree completely !
Government agencies are creating "Newspeak" by virtue of administrative fiat, and thus bypassing any legislation oversight.
ATF redefining what is a "receiver" is just another example of Federal administrative "over-reach".

[Lazamataz]

ATF redefining what is a "receiver" is just another example of Federal administrative "over-reach".

AND, they want to define any part that is visible to the exterior of the weapon, and encloses any one part of the firing mechanism, as a 'receiver'.

That would make a trigger lock into a 'receiver'. It is exterior-visible, and encloses the trigger. Example:

NUCKING FUTS.

[M Kehoe]

Hi.

Imho, the Entire U.S. government is OOC, out of control.

5.56mm

[Moltke]

Very apropos - I am just re-reading John Ross’s Unintended Consequences.

Wonder when someone out there will go full-on Henry Bowman...

[equaviator]

That for the most part, patriots haven’t had to resort to making their own guns due to the unavailability of the popular name brands.

[BlackAdderess]

Thanks