Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One FAKE PCR ‘Test’ to rule us all. How the CDC/FDA/NIH and World Health Organization made themselves gods.
8/25/2021 | vanity

Posted on 08/25/2021 5:07:47 AM PDT by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: blueplum

Thanks. The Covid doesn’t exist conspiracy theory is one of the strangest, and I don’t understand how anyone could fall for.

It’s like 9/11 truthers were arguing the attacks never happened and anyone who visits New York will still see the towers.


21 posted on 08/25/2021 9:37:27 AM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Please read the first page of this: https://fossaorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/media.pdf for the PCR test. It says on the first page in red bold faced letters:

"For Emergency Use Only".

This was one of the early PCR testing protocols, not all PCR testing, back when there was no good testing. That has changed. Now there are 280 approved PRC tests.

Again, the withdrawal of one EUA for one PCR test does not affect all other PCR tests.

22 posted on 08/25/2021 10:47:20 AM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

You got “ 22261 taacatcact aggtttcaaa ctttacttgc tttacataga agttatttga ctcctggtga” wrong.

Should be: 22261 taacatcaca aggtttcaaa ctttacttgc tttacataga agttatttga ctcctggtga


23 posted on 08/25/2021 11:08:55 AM PDT by Jayster (Legalize Marijuana )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
delusional poppycock that lowers the overall IQ level of Free Republic by 30 points.

You got some balls on you, old woman, considering that everything you write comes out of the mouth of Fauci.

Its people like you that are giving America to China. And you do it so happily.


24 posted on 08/25/2021 11:15:57 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew
Thanks. The Covid doesn’t exist conspiracy theory is one of the strangest, and I don’t understand how anyone could fall for.

Did you even read the article, Fauci-bot? Words mean things, and each and every word written means something.


25 posted on 08/25/2021 11:17:22 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

Again, the withdrawal of one EUA for one PCR test does not affect all other PCR tests.
~~~~~
I don’t need to read it. There is no isolated reference sample. that is all.


26 posted on 08/25/2021 11:27:30 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew; blueplum; ransomnote; grey_whiskers; Jane Long
This link was included in the article (which you didn't read). It goes to an interview (with transcription) explaining why there is no "isolated, certified reference material for the Covid-19 virus".

isolated, certified reference material for the Covid-19 virus

Interviewer (paraphrase): I cannot find any isolated, certified reference material for the Covid-19 virus. Apparently, it does not exist. Why would that be?

Dr. Judy Mikovits: Correct because SARS Cov2 was never a human virus isolated from human cells and shown to be infectious and transmittable to human cells.

What was done is, the SARS Cov2 virus was manufactured in the viro monkey kidney cell line, is the manufacturing plant, and so every picture you get of SARS Cov2 or SARS or MERS is a, literally, a manufactured particle that is a monkey virus.

SO it’s a monkey virus, but that monkey virus, its DNA, it sequences, were injected in polio vaccines, in MMR vaccines, in FLU vaccines, and they ‘ve been in that cell line since the mid 90’s.

So just like Dr. David Martin was saying, it’s only just a bunch of sequences, and this is what PCR detects is sequences of virus particle buds, it buds literally out of the cell of the host.

Read that again, Fauci. "Just a bunch of sequences...". Sorta like the troll post you put up, without knowing a damn thing about anything.

Isn't it time you vaxtards started listening to actual experts?


27 posted on 08/25/2021 11:36:04 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
I don’t think he was trolling at all.

Well you wouldn't, would you. #TeamFauci presents a united front. Its the way of the derp.

After telling the OP 5000 times since the stupid FluBro thread days...

And you Covid/Vax-Bots have been wrong 5001 times, ever since this covid psyop was rolled out by the Derp/China coalition.

You are the most gullible and easily controlled population in America, and proudly so. You are ridiculous sheep-people.

the virus was obtained from the first evacuation flights by our very own military biolab, and that the original and the thousand variants since have been sequenced by multiple labs in multiple countries, maybe 1000 lines of code will finally make an impression.

Ahhh, but what were they sequencing, Mrs. Fauci? Read my previous post to learn more.


28 posted on 08/25/2021 11:44:35 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Do you happen to know what a virus is?

All viruses are bundle of DNA/RNA wrapped in a layer of grease.

What do you expect a virus to be other than “a bunch of sequences?”


29 posted on 08/25/2021 11:44:40 AM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew
It’s like 9/11 truthers were arguing the attacks never happened and anyone who visits New York will still see the towers.


30 posted on 08/25/2021 11:48:27 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blueplum; bagster

delusional poppycock that lowers the overall IQ level of Free Republic by 30 points.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You continue to post your ‘delusional poppycock*’ that lowers the overall IQ level of the Internet by 30 points. You know your commentary is toxic to humanity and STILL you proudly post it.

*(who says that any more?)


31 posted on 08/25/2021 11:48:46 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Amen.

BTTT.

(Stay far away from the swabs.)


32 posted on 08/25/2021 11:50:21 AM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew
Do you happen to know what a virus is? All viruses are bundle of DNA/RNA wrapped in a layer of grease. What do you expect a virus to be other than “a bunch of sequences?” I don't have to know what a virus is, Jonas Salk. That doctor interviewed knows.

I urge you to read (and watch) her interview, and this time, take off your Fauci knee-pads.

#TheTruthIsOutThere

#AndItAintAtFaucisNIH


33 posted on 08/25/2021 11:54:17 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
"I don't need to read it. There is no isolated reference sample. that is all."

and

"No purified samples of the Covid-19 virus exist."

-----------------

These claims are half right. There was no sample available for that one test at that time. The virus had already been found and isolated in a lab. It simply took time to get samples to other labs and for other labs to isolated it.

This is using one source of information selectively while ignoring others.

The document "CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel" was first published on Feb 4, 2020.

From the National Center for Biotechnology Information, one of the early studies to isolate Covid: Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19, Feb 11, 2020.

It took time to isolate and distribute the virus, and emergency procedures are emergency procedures, last resort, not the preferred method. Again, this was a early emergency procedurea and the CDC admitted all the problems this one procedure had up front. It did not mean that doctors were required to use ONLY this one test either.

So did that document, when there was not much to go on, prevent anyone from later on isolating the virus afterwards?

There are 280 PCR tests. Are you claiming that problems with one are binding on all others that came afterwards?

What is your basis to say that a lack of a reference sample makes the test entirely useless, as well as all other tests that came later?

34 posted on 08/25/2021 11:57:28 AM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
'Poppycock'

*(who says that any more?)

This troll is the materfamilias of the troll family. She's like 100 or something.

They talk funny.


35 posted on 08/25/2021 12:00:56 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr
Does the following mean nothing to you, Midget?

So it’s a monkey virus, but that monkey virus, its DNA, it sequences, were injected in polio vaccines, in MMR vaccines, in FLU vaccines, and they ‘ve been in that cell line since the mid 90’s.

So just like Dr. David Martin was saying, it’s only just a bunch of sequences, and this is what PCR detects is sequences of virus particle buds, it buds literally out of the cell of the host.


36 posted on 08/25/2021 12:08:01 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr
There is no isolated sample of the Covid virus. You are unwilling to read the article that explains why there will NEVER BE an isolated sample of the COvid virus in human cell lines.

Next, the PCR has been demonstrated to test fruit, Coca Cola and Spanish water 'positive' for Covid. Recently, some school children tested ORANGE JUICE and found it had Covid too. The President of Tanzania had motor oil tested, but motor oil's PCR was inconclusive.

The WHO got creative and listed a portion of the human genome as reference sequence. That way every human being can potentially test positive for Covid if the swab picks up their genetic material. Good thinking, eh?

IT.IS.FAKE. The claims there are no isolated samples STILL are 100% correct. Pushing "we fixed it" doesn't make it so.

Had there BEEN isolated samples, the PCR is still not the correct test. Even Faucie admitted the tests are run at such high cycle rates, the results are meaningless with the presence of tiny fragments of what was once unrelated viral and cellular components, incapable of causing disease but part of natural immune function. FAUCI admitted it. Why is it possible for you people to admit the tests are worthless but a few days later declare it never happened?

Don't you wonder why the CDC has rule that PCR tests for vaccinated people will be run at lower cycle rates than PCR tests for unvaccinated people? It lowers the false positive rate and falsifies 'vaccine' efficacy.

The PCR is an ASSAY and the inventor correctly noted that by design it is unsuited to diagnose ANY DISEASE. It detects materials present in quantities too small to impact human health and it 'amplifies it' so it can be studied. 

Pfizer excluded thousands of sick people from its 'efficicacy calculations' using fake PCR tests. That is, you can see the people ARE SICK but then you 'get' to ignore the failure of the vaccine by claiming test results from a test that doesn't measure anything, and is meaningless, somehow came out 95% in favor of your billion dollar product.

37 posted on 08/25/2021 12:08:46 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr
There are 280 PCR tests. Are you claiming that problems with one are binding on all others that came afterwards?

What is your basis to say that a lack of a reference sample makes the test entirely useless, as well as all other tests that came later?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The PCR 'assay' is looking for a match between its reference sample and something in a swab sample. Since it does not have a reference sample of the PCR, it cannot find a unique match but instead finds sequences of material in many, many products, including other coronaviruses, goats, kiwi, papppaya and Coca Cola. ALL 280 tests lack the capacity to identify COVID>

38 posted on 08/25/2021 12:10:59 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

The PCR test is not valid, but it gives the powers that be the ability to say the words “case” and “infected” when there is no one sick from any disease.

The daily numbers that came out were based on the fake PCR test. Policy was based on those numbers.

We were frightened based on those numbers. Remember the ominous sound of “he tested positive.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ah yes. The invention of the ‘asymptomatic case’ which was previously known as ‘healthy’.

More cases of perfectly healthy people were deemed asymptomatic! OH NOES! HEALTHY PEOPLE ARE RAGING OUT OF CONTROL!!!

A test became a case. No more waiting around for people to become ill. Oh sure, it’s awkward when one individual has 3 tests in one day and the results don’t agree. Even more embarrassing when people test positive on Monday, negative on Tuesday and Positive on Wednesday. The test that keeps on giving.


39 posted on 08/25/2021 12:26:54 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
I want to avoid us having two different conversations over each other. My concern is, that you are running several related yet separate events and issues together. That makes having a clear discussion on any single issue nearly impossible. So please clarify:

Are you saying there are no Covid reference samples at all?

Do you believe that Covid has never been isolated?

Are you aware that the PRC tests that found Covid in Kiwi were bad Chinese tests in Tanzania, and were not U.S. tests?
Also, good for the Tanzanian health agencies for checking their testing equipment and their President for publicly calling it out.

40 posted on 08/25/2021 12:29:57 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson