Posted on 09/24/2021 4:22:22 AM PDT by MtnClimber
You raise good points.
A lot of things have been said. AZ has been working on this audit for a long time, and I don’t expect to a any better or more thorough audit any time soon. This seems like the Big One. If the final report doesn’t mention watermarks, printer IDs, lack of folds, inconsistent paper, or any of these other concerns, then I would conclude that those things never existed.
If the AZ audit fails to seal the deal and is eventually shrugged off as “I guess it was all fine” then I see no possibility that future elections will matter in the slightest. Proof of Concept has been attained: you can steal elections without fear of consequences.
First I’ve seen and it IS so obvious
I don’t think this is the total audit details. Just a little sneak peak. I see the cnn and such already saying it all matched up. So I am guessing the real proof will come out today. The guy on bannon seemed to say it was gonna be earth shattering. Let’s hope so.
It may be a democRAT leak to spin the story and add confusion.
By that measure this entire thread is a major distraction because there’s no context whatsoever. You’re looking at Table 6.2. Where is the rest of the report and all the other tables and figures?
Th UK Daily Mail is reporting that Biden actually picked up 360 votes and won the state...
Large numbers of problematic ballots are more severe than smaller discrepancies. Individual issues which are at or more than the margin of vote are critical problems.
I read a portion. I am now waiting to get the full report so I can excerpt portions and make relevant comments.
One thing caught me eye. The Audit Team used the latest People Finder software and the Social Security databases to verify voters.
So my question is:
Why aren’t the Election Supervisors in all 3,000 counties in the USA doing the same to validate their Voter Registration Rolls and Election Rolls?????
After all, elections are only held every two years and there is more than enough downtime between elections to keep voter registration records up to date!!!!!!
I don’t like the use of the word “potential” either. Doesn’t a forensic audit remove potential issues and confirm illegal issues?
I see the media is already running with “the audit proves Joe Biden won Arizona” lololol. Spin baby spin
How do you figure he lost?
This excerpt from the AZ audit says:
The hand recount for Biden says he gained 99 votes, while Trump lost 261 votes.
So what makes you think Trump won?
That's absolutely NOT what the report says.
An audit-level recount of the actual ballots resulted in Biden winning by several hundred more votes than previously counted, but look at Table 6.2 at the top of the thread. There were tens of thousands of ballots that were cast illegally, or in such a way that the legitimacy of the ballot could not be verified.
Signatures. But given that, potential isn’t proof. And to overturn, proof is needed. I think we knew x ballots fell under potential. That’s a lot of money and angst wasted. Unless the goal was to get back door access for future elections.
From page 1 of the executive summary:
“Had Maricopa County chosen to cooperate with the audit, the majority of these obstacles would have easily been overcome. By the County withholding subpoena items, their unwillingness to answer questions as is normal between auditor and auditee, and in some cases actively interfering with audit research, the County prevented a complete audit.”
I don’t mean to keep posting pessimistic comments to this thread, but I am very curious about table 6.2.
As far as I can see, Table 6.2 basically says “stuff happened”.
I saw Trump’s huge rallies. I saw Biden’s anemic campaign. I cannot believe that Biden got 81 million votes. It seems very clear to me that Biden cheated and did not really win.
But, again, as far as I can see, Table 6.2 basically says “stuff happened”.
I’m missing the rock solid proof that 55,000 votes were manufactured for Biden. All I see is that 55,000 votes were possibly manufactured. That is insufficient. It changes nothing.
What am I missing?
There's no such thing as "rock solid proof" in an audit of mail-in ballots like this. As I said earlier on this thread, there's no way in hell to prove voter fraud unless someone comes out and admits that they voted fraudulently or altered a ballot after it was cast.
Anyone who was expecting "rock solid proof" was obviously paying too much attention to dopes like Lin Wood and Sidney Powell. There was never going to be a "Kraken," folks.
Auditing mail-in ballots is like auditing a cash business. Unless the auditor is standing in the business establishment and watching every cash transaction, there's no way to "prove" anything except what shows up in the bank transactions. "ABC Restaurant did $20,000 of business through credit card transactions this month and deposited $5,000 cash in the bank. That's $25,000 of gross revenue for the business. They reported $20,000 of expenses for the month, all of which was paid through their own credit card accounts or by company check. So their profit for the month was $5,000.00 as reported. We cannot verify, however, that the $5,000 of cash deposits in the company's bank account represents all of the cash transactions for the business."
The auditor can then note that the owner of the establishment owns a Ferrari, a Lamborghini and a Porsche ... and lives in a $2 million home ... and has no other reported sources of income. So there's obviously a disconnect between what he's reporting for the business and what he's actually collecting in cash transactions. Nothing is "proven," but the facts themselves are all the evidence you need to know this.
Keep in mind that the information presented in Table 6.2 is all anyone needs to reaffirm any doubts about the legitimacy of the 2020 election.
There was never going to be an "overturn" here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.