Posted on 09/01/2022 3:58:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Ummm, maybe your trolling little face forgot, but the jabs weren’t announced till after the election, lest news of it get him elected.”
Even if true it still doesn’t change the validy of my post.
OTOH, Operation Warpspeed was announced in April 2020 amid nationwide coverage.
Oh my. She had to call in reinforcements. Here it comes. Troll. $hot $hill and all the same Pavlovian insults
You might actually scare her into posting another Q thread so she can get some loving tonight. The world is a cold cruel place when all you have is Kirrsch, Malone and McCollough.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Here's how the vaccine is causing those weird "blood clots", TexasGator wrote: |
“Here’s Mediabiasfactcheck:” ROTFLMAO! Your here is a mega-Obama supporter and your fact checknadmits their left leanings. Notice that they use Politifact. Their review of Politifact is “Overall, we rate Politifact Left-Center Biased based on fact checks that tend to be more favorable for the left.” ——————A big red FAlSE———— Claim by Mike Lindell: “15,000 people in Antrim County, Mich., voted, and 7,000 votes flipped.” PolitiFact rating: False |
I just told you the source you cite as superior, Science X, uses leftist talking point - World Health Organization fact check 'partners' and you, having nothing to say to this exposure, claim I am the one citing your sources? Mediabiasfactcheck is used by your 'so-called' reliable source, Sicence X.
R U OKAY? O is this just how you roll? You are projecting your mistakes onto me-where have I seen that before?
You sure know how to say a whole lot of nothing.
Your fact checking source:
Poynter Medal
Since 2015, the Poynter Medal for Lifetime Achievement in Journalism has been awarded by the Poynter Institute. Winners include:
2015: Bob Schieffer, former CBS News anchor and host of Face the Nation
2016: Tom Brokaw, former anchor of NBC Nightly News
2017: Judy Woodruff, anchor and managing editor of PBS NewsHour
2018: Lester Holt, anchor of NBC Nightly News and Dateline NBC
2019: Katie Couric, broadcast journalist, author and media entrepreneur
2020: Chris Wallace, anchor of Fox News Sunday
2021: Lesley Stahl, correspondent for CBS News’ 60 Minutes
So what?
President Trump wasn’t the one who invented and used a dangerous untested technology.
And President Trump was ridiculed to hell by the LugenPress, and Pfauci and others, “drink bleach” when he suggested alternative treatments.
And it was Josef Stolen, after the stolen election, who tried to enfore mandates for the clot shots.
Your trolling won’t work here, we know better.
“Mediabiasfactcheck is used by ...”
YOU!
YOU quoted Science X as authoritative, even though they rely upon biased sources, and you’re pretending I DID? Is that all you have - flat out lying?
Here’s Science X’s statement, in my post, along with their disreputable sources, included MediaBiasFactCheck - an obvious leftist propaganda outlet.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4090157/posts?page=31#31
You are pushing censorship via corrupt sites and claiming they are my sources. A new low, even for you, TexasGator.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Here's how the vaccine is causing those weird "blood clots", TexasGator wrote: |
“Mediabiasfactcheck is used by ...” YOU! |
False. You're lying. You promote Science X and it's content as more reliable than my sources. Here's Science X's statement from their about page.
https://sciencex.com/help/about-us/
"Science X credibility and transparency is independently confirmed and highly ranked by various journalistic organizations such as NewsGuard, Media Bias/Fact Check, etc. "
That's your source, but you're just going to keep lying and say it's mine. Well I hope this gets you a promotion because all it does here is earn my disgust.
“False. You’re lying.”
Rotflmao! Your post #31 posted to me! “Here’s mediabiasfactcheck” followed by a link to their site:
——FYI your site review of FREEREPUBLIC-—————
Overall, we rate Free Republic Right Biased based on open endorsement of conservatism and the topics of story selection. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to users occasionally publishing information from questionable sources
“That’s your source, but you’re just going to keep lying and say it’s mine. “
You are losing it. See a doctor.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Here's how the vaccine is causing those weird "blood clots", TexasGator wrote: “Hey, that website your claiming is ‘reliable’ says it relies on ‘fact checkers’ and with a quick look at those it lists, they are obviously engaging in censorship. Did you know?”
I made no claim. Don’t lie. I excerpted some quotes in an article.
Accept the quotes or prove them false.
You did your tiny little best to make it seem like my source was inferior to yours, and to do so, you took quotes frmo an article from a leftist 'narrative' site to prove it. Your narrative site uses fake FACT CHECKERS like MediaBias, which you inadvertently pointed out is a hard lefty trash site.
You want to heap garbage 'narrative' content by the ton in front of me and then give me a homework assignement to go prove it wrong? What if I don't like it when you waste my time? Especially since you spent about 10 seconds forumlating your posts, and then send me off to research your propaganda.
You are trolling, pretending I cited MediaBias when your so-called source for quotes is Science X, which claims on its ABOUT page it uses fake fact checkers, including MediaBias. Have a spine and admit you are the one who cited content vetted by MediaBias. I don’t think you will.
“You are trolling, pretending I cited MediaBias “
LOL! I cited the post number. You are really losing it!
Here is the full post:
To: TexasGator; grey_whiskers; bagster; Jane Long; metmom
Hey, that website your claiming is ‘reliable’ says it relies on ‘fact checkers’ and with a quick look at those it lists, they are obviously engaging in censorship. Did you know?
“Science X credibility and transparency is independently confirmed and highly ranked by various journalistic organizations such as NewsGuard, Media Bias/Fact Check, etc. “
Here’s Mediabiasfactcheck:
If you read content at the link, their bias is obvious and they in turn rely on Factcheck.org and politifact - two troll favorites!
Newsguard, the other factchecker named by Science X includes the names of its partners like the World Health Organization, US Dept of Defense and the US Dept of State, and if you read the content there, Newsguard is anti-Trump.
https://www.newsguardtech.com/
I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that you relentlessly push ‘the narrative’ with which that the Biden Administration is paying big bucks to blanket communications channels.
31 posted on 9/1/2022, 9:22:50 PM by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
You really are just here to soak up as much of my time as possible. I was right when I said I didn’t think you’d admit to your posted content.
“You really are just here to soak up as much of my time as possible. I was right when I said I didn’t think you’d admit to your posted content.”
You made a post using meadiabiascheck and you said you didn’t.
I gave the post # and again you called me a liar. I posted your full post. I proved your lie and that is your response!
“You really are just here to soak up as much of my time as possible.”
Nope. I just don’t agree with your liberal sources. I don’t understand your love-fest for a mega-donor, Gore/Obama/Supporter.
I laugh at a mortician that gets a body, Opens the cavity pulling out a bag of organs and claims he has found the strange clots, which he explains have changed in appearance due to being soaked in formaldehyde.
Creepy the way you keep at the indoctrination effort, and after you’ve lied over and over you will finally come to believe those were my sources after all, and you’ll act indignant if anyone points out they were your sources from the start. You’re going with sheer repetition - that’s just part of why you’re boring.
“Creepy the way you keep at the indoctrination effort, and after you’ve lied over and over “
You haver never cited where I lied. OTOH, I posted proof-posited where you lied.
“Creepy ...”
Yes. About your source:
-———————Infiltrated by SPLC———————
Poynter published a list of over 515 news websites that it labeled “unreliable” in 2019. The author of the piece used various fake news databases (including those curated by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, Merrimack College, PolitiFact, and Snopes) to compile the list and called on advertisers to “blacklist” the included sites. The list included conservative news websites such as the Washington Examiner, The Washington Free Beacon, and The Daily Signal as well as conspiracy outfits including InfoWars.[18] After backlash from both readers of and contributors to some of the included publications, Poynter retracted the list, citing “weaknesses in the methodology”.[19] Poynter issued a statement, saying: “[w]e regret that we failed to ensure that the data was rigorous before publication, and apologize for the confusion and agitation caused by its publication.”[20] Reason pointed out that the author was a freelancer hired by the Institute who typically works for the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Reason drew parallels between the accuracy of the list with SPLC’s own work on hate groups.[18]
-————Funding from Zuckerberg-————
In January 2020, having received funding from Facebook, the Poynter Institute was able to expand the MediaWise Programme with a national media literacy program called MediaWise Voter project (#MVP) to reach 2 million American first-time voter college students, helping them to be better prepared and informed for the 2020 elections.[21]
———Why?-—————
The Poynter Institute received $737,400 in federal loans from the Paycheck Protection Program during the COVID-19 pandemic. President Neil Brown noted that this was not the first time the institute received government funding, noting past training contracts with Voice of America.[22]
*sigh*
More repetition of your false assertions. Do you have lie a certain number of times before it begins to ‘take’ among the indoctrinated? What’s the number? Are you going for 20 repetitions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.