Posted on 10/13/2022 6:25:25 AM PDT by george76
And so then the definition 3 does not exist? It is not there because you don’t like it? I have no clue why folks think they can cherry pick or redefine. It is a real problem and what the left does all the time.
Depending on application ALL the definitions of a vocabulary word are acceptable options. Not just one or two in the list. Or self invented definitions that are not even there.
As used in this OP definitions 3-a and 3-b absolutely do apply as it was used. It is a pet peeve that so many do this, especially the left with deceptive redefinition for propaganda purposes.
“My guess is the next little ice age cycle or two or three will develop into the big one.”
I think so too... It is already late and overdue.
Yes, to some extent. However, all you are doing by putting the blame on Soros\WEF is deflecting the blame from the voter. Soros\WEF are NOT in the voting booth with the voter. They make the decision to be stupid, vote for fanciful things!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropic_of_Cancer
The Tropic of Cancer's position is not fixed, but constantly changes because of a slight wobble in the Earth's longitudinal alignment relative to the ecliptic, the plane in which the Earth orbits around the Sun. Earth's axial tilt varies over a 41,000-year period from 22.1 to 24.5 degrees, and as of 2000 is about 23.4 degrees, which will continue to remain valid for about a millennium. This wobble means that the Tropic of Cancer is currently drifting southward at a rate of almost half an arcsecond (0.468″) of latitude, or 15 m (49 ft), per year. The circle's position was at exactly 23° 27′N in 1917 and will be at 23° 26'N in 2045.[2] The distance between the Antarctic Circle and the Tropic of Cancer is essentially constant as they move in tandem. This is based on an assumption of a constant equator, but the precise location of the equator is not truly fixed. See: equator, axial tilt and circles of latitude for additional details.
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/11913/does-the-elliptical-orbit-of-the-earth-have-effect-on-earths-climate
Questions
Does the elliptical orbit of the Earth have effect on Earth's climate?
Short answer. When the Earth is closest to the sun in January that softens the seasonal variation in the Northern Hemisphere and it increases the seasonal variation in the Southern Hemisphere, so for now, in the Northern Hemisphere, the Summers are colder than they would be with a circular orbit and the winters are hotter. The opposite is true in the Southern Hemisphere.
Overall the eccentricity variation doesn't change how much solar energy hits the Earth by much, so it's not the total solar energy. It's when combined with precession, and the effect on the seasons, that the global effect can be significant.
If we had a perfectly circular obit then the only Milankovich cycle that would matter would be axial tilt. Ice ages would either be on a 41,000 year cycle - very neat and tidy, or they wouldn't happen at all cause the orbital variation wouldn't be enough to get ice ages started. Other factors, like solar minimums could play a role and over longer periods of time, continental drift and variations in plant life, so, maybe not that exactly that, but I think it's likely.
The election fraud, as far as I see it, is what pushes the elections over the edge.
There will always be some aged out hippies or idealistic brainwashed young people, who vote liberal but if there were honest elections, I doubt the number of democrats in office would be as high as it is today.
It was pouring here at 2 pm... Must been global warming...
It’s a reverse decimation
Even without the fraud 40% to almost 50%*of the electorate will vote for fantasy!
Sadly, that is true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.