Just out of curiosity, how many of the 330 million Americans ever watched this program?
“Here are the first photos from Karahantepe.
As Arkeolojihaber team, we participated in the promotion program organized by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism for #Karahantepe . A mindset has been broken. We need to reexamine everything we know. #Göbeklitepe is not alone.”
https://twitter.com/arkeolojihaber/status/1441426286614822914?s=20&t=Bh7XIHeI08luvkX9V4elAQ
“Believing that election fraud is real?”
This statement, as far as I’m concerned, flushed the author’s credibility right down the toilet.
I was in the School of Social Sciences back in the 1980’s and the anthropology students were whispering about stuff like this back then.
The time lines don’t add up. Artifacts are routinely found in periods that cannot be explained by accepted theory. My favorite was how they kept finding evidence that geological formations that were supposedly millions of years old showed signs of being only 10s of thousands years old. If they pointed these discoveries out to their professors, they were initially just chastised and shown how - according to so and so - this area was formed millions of years ago. If they persisted, they were sent home. The others quickly learned to not question the orthodoxy.
It is similar as in the time of Galileo. You cannot question the established narrative or you a kook and kooks don’t get published or tenure. At least they don’t burn them at the stake...yet...
Something happened at the end of the Younger Dryas. The earth was in an ice age, so it was only really habitable near the equator. Hancock’s theory that we went through the tail of a comet and got hit by a lot of smaller strikes world wide makes a lot sense. It melted a lot of the ice quickly, causing global flooding leading to the flood myths in many cultures. It explains the rapid extinction of mastodons, mammoths, saber-toothed tigers, etc., that happened at the time. It also explains why some ancient monuments seem to date back further than they should.
If you look at the conventional timeline, we have only had some sort of civilization for maybe 5000 years if you are generous. It appears, from the fossil record, that humanoids of one kind or another, have been around for at least 100,000 years. That is enough time for 20 of our civilizations to rise. Is it so hard to believe that there could have been one advanced civilization of humans before ours?
While I'm surprised that archeological institutions refuse to admit that something is the reason for the existence of these artifacts we see around the globe. On the other hand it doesn't surprise me one bit that a journalist needs to blame this on those who believe in conspiracies, because they are not among the brightest beingings on this blue ball.
If this is just a conspiracy theory, then why do so many ancient civilizations tell of a destructive flood in the distant past?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_flood_myths